What can be said at all can be said clearly

>what can be said at all can be said clearly

do you agree or is good old ludwig a faggot`?

>If you say things to clearly, it's because you don't have much to say.
Waissman.

that's retarded

Pseuds will get buttblasted but he's 100% right

>if you can't speak of it you gotta shut up

but you're gonna shut up anyway if you can't speak of it in the first place. Philosophy is stupid.

Obviously wrong, many things can be known intellectually but extremely hard to express in writing.

Name one

>"Time to die, Popper"
Do you agree with Wittgenstein?

Wish he stuck the cuck desu

love
pain
loss
music
art

It was said defending Wittgenstein against the claims that the Tractatus was too obscure.

But people write about that shit clearly all the time

Wittgenstein learned his lesson later. Late > Early Wittgenstein

This had potential, but you ruined it.

Dasein

The what?

really? so writing about a piece of music without hearing the song can make you know what the song sounds like?

Thats just proving Wittgenstein's point

the Dao

Da sein

>dude you can always say things in a way that makes them easier to understand!
>the '''''solver''''' of philosophy

>nah, I haven't read any philosophy at all, but why don't we just all philosophical problems are wrong? lol, top kek. Greatest solution.

If it can't be expressed well enough to explain to someone else it isn't truly known only felt.

Yes. If you've heard music before and understand music theory, then you can literally just accurately imagine it based on what is written.

You obviously haven't read Wittgenstein or you'd realize that he's not talking about experiences like those. (1) Our intuitive knowledge or understanding of these phenomenon is largely non-cognitive, and hence not the content of thought as Wittgenstein is considering. (2) What we have to say about these subjects is largely articulated in the form of poetic or literary language.

Wittgenstein is specifically concerned with language as a tool for factual discourse conducted in a scientific manner (broadly speaking, that is: by scientific we mean concerned with empirical phenomenon).

Thus you argument s irrelevant because he wouldn't have claimed that we can't poetically convey feelings and ideas, or that we can't use metaphor and figurative language, or that we can't talk about love or pain or music.