The pseud is strong in this one

BURN THE BOOKS

He is doing ironically

he looks like an old lady

based kantbot working the peterson worshipping soylets of Veeky Forums

Ha, he looks like my Mom's fat lesbian friend!

Deleuze and co. were mere relayers of CIA LSD Cybernetics, don't be fooled by the tired trappings of old Europe. These ideas owe much more to the times than it is commonly accepted. Gregory Bateson was a huge influence on Deleuze and Guattari and also on Stewart Brand, cyberculture and what later became silicon valley. Despite the countercultural affinities, many of these people, scientists, communalists, acid freak were basically networking with the military industrial complex. Their core ideas originate with cold war think tanks. The whole earth catalog is pretty 'rhizomatic', dontcha think?

monoskop.org/images/0/09/Brand_Stewart_Whole_Earth_Catalog_Fall_1968.pdf

i respect this man as an intellectual more than anyone i've interacted with over the internet in my years

this would be embarrassing for me, but props for speaking his mind in front of all those people. I don't know wtf he was talking about lol.

That's the joke

>all these fucking plebbitors who don't know kantbot2k

Kantbot's pathetic desire to be an e-celeb is pretty Reddit, man

Can you not laugh at a clown?

kantbot is a gem

prussian autocracy isn't significantly more desirable than national socialism

supreme kek

Based desu.

I hate Leibniz

yeah i saw this, pretty cringe. someone circulated the description for his top-tier patreon reward and he used the word "esoteric" twice in it.

he makes funny posts sometimes though and i dont begrudge liking the ones that show up on my tl via retweet.

also this

t. Voltaire

Of course he's a pseud but his tweets are still fucking hilarious.

This is his GOAT take

Why people follow this guy is beyond me. It's clear he doesn't read the books he posts, or reads/knows philosophy. I pressed him on Aristotelian and Humean induction in relation to Kantian metaphysics one time and he blocked me. Fuck that fat fuck.

yeah but to be fair you were probably being an annoying sperg

>I pressed him on Aristotelian and Humean induction in relation to Kantian metaphysics one time and he blocked me

I would've blocked you too.

Classic lit response "No one reads books but me!!"

I LOVE this man

>I pressed him on Aristotelian and Humean induction in relation to Kantian metaphysics one time
You couldn't have said "I'm a pseud" better.

It's funny how all boards seem to be united by >tfw no gf
The anime boards try to replace a gf with a waifu, ponyfags have their tulpas, Veeky Forums tries to lift the feels away but can't, see
Half the threads on /pol/ are about blacks mating with their white women, /v/ has Friday night threads to emphasize the fact that they have no gf's to go out with, etc.

The sad thing is, most of you people are probably cringing at his actual book choices, but I'm cringing a level higher. At the simple fact this cunt is posting an image of the books obscure shit he's reading. It's so transparent.

I hope I'll be able to meet him one day so I can snap his fat neck.

When are we going to have a major Veeky Forums figure that isn't a cringe-y retard?

How good of a friend is she user? ;)

4-D Chess

>how old are you?
>I'm eternal
Every fucking time

/our guy/ spreading the truth to the plebs

Stop samefagging kantbot

I think he's a pseud and a sperg but the video was funny, it would've been cringy without the editing I'm sure

Red-Pill curious Jewess qt wanted that Kantbot dialectic

Nah I seen it the first time, it was always funny
Dorks need to get a sense of humor

He's trolling you fucktard

Wew lad

This level of BASED autism

Just as a rule of thumb, you should be skeptical of anyone who feels compelled to show everyone on the internet that they read. Although I quite like Kantbot so I'll let it slide just this once.

>you should be skeptical of anyone who feels compelled to show everyone on the internet that they read

Why? It's entirely possible one of his followers doesn't know a particular book he's picturing. These are usually just blanket recommendations to people. Things are changing user. People communicate mostly via social media now. If you had a bulletin board that could be seen by 50 people at any given time, why wouldn't you post things you want others to enjoy?

Sounds like you just don't like one particular person who does this. Or you feel you're special for reading, and you belong in a super sekret klub!

You're more autistic than he, to be frank.

>Although I quite like Kantbot
kys

I post books I read in Instagram all the time. I'm also published, and most likely smarter than you.
It attracts the literary cuties who are also into lowkey Baphomet worship, and will let you do extremely nasty butt things with them. You just sound like a bitter fag lmao

Why is he reading English versions?

How can he be this insane yet so compelling at the same time? I know he's spouting nonsense, but fuck it. I'm sold. Donald Trump will complete the system of german idealism!

Fuck all you niggers, do you fags even lift? I've been following kantbot since 2015.

I wonder if legalizing prostitution would have prevented all of this.

thats not something to be proud of

It's his happiness. It looks so sincere and pure that I want to be a part of it.

Has he ever explained what he meant with Trump completing the system of German idealism?

but does he need to?

Leibniz and Descartes were near contemporaries, very interested in the burgeoning natural sciences and the problems it posed, and were mathematical innovators

i mean, really you could just read inherent vice and find pynchon already came to a similar insight.

its a joke...

Only brainlets need an explanation.

You are like on of those guys who keep asking nerdy girls comic book questions so they can prove they are real geeks.

fuck off liberal

She's so cute and looks so mesmerized by Kantbot that I can't help it but feel a bit envious of that fat bastard.

damn this is fucking stupid

Holy shit, the dude is so alpha.
Worst is seeing all the ameritards thinking german idealism is nazism, what brainlets

Advice on Beginning a Serious Study of Literature

Here is a post I wrote a while ago you might find interesting.

First of all, you have to read for yourself and your own interests. The only thing “great books” have in common is that they’re all great, but in terms of the worldviews and ideas they articulate, they’re incredibly diverse, reading according to a list of books other people tell you are good is a bad way to go about it, you need to develop taste and figure out what you believe is good. Taste is more than subjective though, it’s a sense for the beautiful, and you have to actively develop that sense.

No one told me what to read, I didn’t learn about any of this stuff through college or graduate school. The type of literature I talk the most about, the German literature of the 1770s-1810s, isn’t really even really taught at American colleges, it’s very poorly understood in the English speaking world and I’ve had to research it and figure it all out largely for myself.

I read and loved Goethe’s mature novels, the “Wilhelm Meister” novels and “Elective Affinities”, and one day in a used book store I found a copy of “Goethe and the Novel” by Eric Blackall and I read that, and that book extensively reconstructed Goethe’s novel reading habits throughout his life, what works were his favorites, what he had said about different novels etc. And I wanted to understand his books better so I started reading some of the Augustan English novels he seemed to talk about the most, like Goldsmith’s “The Vicar of Wakefield”.

Human knowledge is unbelievably self-reflexive, you have to develop the ability to be critical about your own knowledge if you want to develop it. You have to objectify what you know and turn it into a picture in your imagination, and when you’re able to do that you can judge that picture as if it were a painting you were in the process of creating, and figure out what you need to do still to fill in all the remaining gaps. Then when you’ve figured out that if you want to know more about, say Augustan era British literature, you can develop a reading list for yourself to teach yourself what you think you need to know.

Off the top of your head can you tell me who Horace is for example? What works he wrote and what time period he lived in? I kept seeing his name come up in works like Tom Jones but I didn’t really have much idea who he was. Turns out the “Augustan” era is called the “Augustan” era because of the influence of Golden Age Latin writers from the time of Augustus, Horace, Virgil, Ovid, Livy etc. And so I decided I should familiarize myself with those writers, and then I found out that Dryden had done very influential translations of Virgil and so I read his Aeneid.

autisticmercury.com/2014/05/04/no-25/

autisticmercury.com/2017/02/25/kantbots-critical-forests/

see

You really have to put in a concerted effort over the course of years, and you have to let your own interests develop themselves. It is daunting, and it only becomes more daunting as time goes on. I’ve come to feel stupider and stupider the more I’ve read because I’ve realized just how much I actually don’t know.

Don’t expect instant results, proceed slowly, take it one book at a time. The more you read the more it all begins to fit together in your head. Part of it is just being humble about your own knowledge and your abilities and not trying to run before you can walk. I had initially ignored Kantian philosophy and at first I didn’t really think it was important to understanding Goethe’s literary works, but then I read Boyle’s “Goethe: The Poet and the Age” (Volume two specifically) and realized that I needed to take it more seriously. I was humble about it though, I knew the CPR would be way over my head and that I needed to start smaller and work my way up. So I read some secondary scholarship like Beiser’s “The Fate of Reason”, and Manfred Kuehn’s biography of Kant. From there I sat down with a much more manageable work, “The Prolegomena To Any Future Metaphysics”, and I sat down with a legal pad and I went through section by section writing the argument of each one out on paper in my own words. The key was I was humble, I broke down what I wanted to learn into smaller bites and I followed through with a course of study I created for myself.

For me there was a very noticeable, profound change in my entire way of thinking after about three or so years of reading, I just hit this sort of critical mass of knowledge where I suddenly exploded into intellectual self-awareness in a way that humiliated me, where it just hit me that what had passed for intelligent thought and reading comprehension when I was in college was only a shadow of the real thing.

I can’t really tell you what you should read, it depends. I’d say pace yourself, begin with shorter and simpler works. The Ancient Greek Romances like “Daphnis and Chloe” or the “Aethiopian Romance” are great. I don’t really know specifically what you’re interested in or what you hope to learn about, do you want to study Kantian-era German literature like Goethe and Schiller? Elizabethan poetry like Shakespeare and Ben Jonson? French Neo-Classicism like Racine and Corneille? Renaissance Italian literature like Dante and Petrarch and Boccaccio? Augustan era literature like Pope and Johnson?

I will say you should teach yourself to read another language based on what period and nation you’re most interested in, and that you should read a lot of secondary-scholarship and history and biography. But beyond that, the world is sort of your oyster so to speak.

hi KB how is everything?

>these plumbers at a rally just don’t get it!
To be fair, they’ve already contributed more than you brainlet pseuds ever could

I very often get people in my messages asking me to recommend them books, or suggest reading lists, but I like to think that I’m a thoughtful person, and it can be difficult when you put such constraints on yourself to give everything you try to do the attention it deserves. Reading is personal, and someone’s taste can be hard to judge without knowing them at all. Meanwhile, I’m usually talking about or recommending books on my timeline frequently enough that I sometimes take for granted that everyone is familiar with some of the books I enjoy. For the friends I’ve made here, and known for a long time, my favorite books are familiar staples of my content, and even I get tired of recommending them after a while, however much I really would like it if everyone read them.

Further complicating things is that book recommendations, in my experience, rarely stick, and everyone already has so much they want to read to begin with, they rarely make it past the first few books of Wilhelm Meister before moving on to something else. I certainly don’t fault them, it’s one of the reasons that not just reading, but scholarship, is such an enjoyable past-time, for we are, after all, the beneficiaries of the erudition of millennia and there’s never any shortage of good books to read.

Constructing a good reading list is therefore no mean feat. First of all there is the question of subject matter. What sort of literature do you, the list creator, want to highlight? The more specialized your focus the more efficiently you can exhaust all the possible introductory avenues, but by being too narrow in your selections you run the risk of excluding potential users who simply don’t share your particular hobby horse. Furthermore, how do you structure your list? As a prescribed syllabus, moving from one work to another programmatically in order to outline a specific point? Or do you go the route of providing a menu from which the curious reader is permitted to select? It can be difficult to match all the elements to one another, but at some point choices have to be made if you’re to make any progress at all in this monumental labor you have (happily) burdened yourself with.

This reading list will then serve as a companion to my #NovelMindset article, as, though this topic might not arouse everyone’s interest the way it does mine, the history and theory of the novel remains central to my reading, and, as this is my list, I believe it should be reflective of what motivates me. I encourage everyone to create similar lists for themselves, as creating a reading list is an opportunity to survey the terrain you have conquered in your studies, and to judge the true extent of our own little empire of taste. Not only do you create a list of books, but it becomes a novelistic exercise in self-creation unto itself.

In addition, the books I mean to recommend utilize every manner of style and technique conceivable, and besides simply being entertaining, they offer the aspiring content creator an endless arsenal of conceits from which to draw when building the literature of tomorrow. Suffice it to say there is much to recommend the reading of novels to us, and this list, I hope, will provide some interesting and enjoyable selections for your consideration.

When one is first entering into a domain of knowledge unfamiliar to them, I believe the best approach is to expose oneself to as much material as possible. Rather than recommend long, intimidating, and difficult novels like Tristram Shandy or Gargantua and Pantagruel, what follows is a serving of more manageable reads. Some of the selections I have made can be read in a sitting or two without much difficulty. They represent a wide cross section and will provide a broad basis for the formation of critical judgment later on. This is not to mention what should obviously be the main appeal though, that they are all enjoyable works of literature in their own right, full of humor and humanity enough to sustain us in these dark and difficult times.

1. Jacques the Fatalist and his Master by Denis Diderot

2. The Exemplary Novels by Cervantes

3. Daphnis and Chloe by Longus

4. Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe

5. The Sorrows of Young Werther by Goethe

6. The Vicar of Wakefield by Oliver Goldsmith

7. Heinrich von Ofterdingen by Novalis

This should, I believe, provide you with sufficient diversion for now. As I created the list it a natural order suggested itself to me, but if any of the books I’ve described appeal to you, there are no rules to how or when they should be read. We sometimes hear of the decline of the novel, as if it is a symptom of something else going on with our culture, but I believe the causation may be in fact reversed. As later novels of the 20th century struggle to integrate their subjective-confessional components by means of an overarching architecture of narrative mitigation, they not only degrade the art form but degrade our very ability to form a coherent society. What sort of future the novel has I can’t say I know, but no matter the direction that literature takes in the future, the study of the novel will remain fundamental to understanding the emergence and functioning of our modern social consciousness.

If you would like to extend this list a bit, I would also recommend the following works:

The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia by Samuel Johnson

The Princesse de Cleves by Madame de Lafayette

The Tales of Hoffmann

An Ethiopian Romance by Heliodorus

The Expedition of Humphry Clinker by Tobias Smollett

Hopefully this will satisfy those in search of book recommendations for a while, and if not, there are always more books to be had, so fret not friends.

Renaissance Italian literature like Dante and Petrarch and Boccaccio?

...

Fuck off Kantbot you fat dumb pseud.

What is your question?

Kant's not a pseud, he's an exposer of pseuds. The guy is the genuine intellectual article tbhfam.

You always know people are lying when they say they’ve read Hegel because Hegel was a fictional character from a contemporary novel written by Schelling about a philosopher driven mad by spector of lovecraftian entity called Geist. All Hegel’s philosophy is a meta-textual prank

>Kant's not a pseud
He isn't on his way to gnosis if he's still drinking from the Descartes well. That much is certain. But he isn't nearly as dumb as user are trying to claim. In fact he's far smarter than the average fare on Veeky Forums; he just lacks an understanding of the spirit world.

>Kant's not a pseud, he's an exposer of pseuds. The guy is the genuine intellectual article tbhfam.
Go away KB, you aren't fooling anyone.

Popular Culture is really an elaborate hunting decoy developed by Predator type aliens who employ environmental toxins and soul crushingly designed workplace preserves as their weapon of choice. You life is a virtual hunting simulator and torture chamber. Your spirit is a trophy.

“You’re a pseud, you’re a pseud, you’re a pseud, none of you are free of pseudo intellectualism,” CyberSocrates420 replied to the e-sophists on twitter dot com

KB make some fucking storylines for fuck’s sake man, the TL is desolate the twatter is dying. water your garden

Why are you so butthurt KB?

Charles Manson was the only person mentally strong enough to resist hypnotizing effect of terrible Beatles music, break free, resist, seek to liberate others. He tried freeing Dennis Wilson but failed. Years later Wilson would drown himself after realizing Manson was right.

>this is why aliens want nothing to do with us.

Because the beatles' music is a front for a worldwide psychic sterilization and genocide? Yes, the aliens are well aware our planet has been enslaved. Very possible Manson didnt die but was teleported by them to lead the resistance in the hyper realm against ghost of John Lennon

Reddit

>But he isn't nearly as dumb as user are trying to claim. In fact he's far smarter than the average fare on Veeky Forums
Being the king of pseuds doesn't make you any less of a pseud just like being 5'9" doesn't make you any less of a manlet.

Some of my favourites:

>‘Science’ is a literary hoax. The ‘scientific method’ was invented by Shakespeare and published under the pseudonym ‘Francis Bacon,’ who never actually existed.

>Eurasianist ideologist Aleksandr Dugin is actually an ancient djinn which Putin unlocked from a cursed heliotrope he uncovered during the KGB invasion of Afghanistan

>“Shit Hole” comes from Shetholê, an ancient Latin term used to designate outlying provincial areas, what Trump is REALLY saying is these areas are rightfully ruled by Rome and that he wouldnt dare presume to interfere with the jurisdiction of any possible successor states. Noble

>You: Salient observations, genuine insights, no irony, reference Heidegger or whatever
>3 Retweets 5 Likes
>Me, (good): Kantbot does a storyline where he’s like a beat poet or something
>1,000 Retweets 10,000 Likes
>eh, jealous cucks?

>Buying crypto isnt a way to make money, its a test devised by strong AI from the future who forces the price down in order to see who’s loyal and who’s not. Selling your coins is a sin against the machine god, do so at your own peril

>Smart doorknobs will sample cells when turned and incubate embryonic clones of users within, the development of which may be monitored via an app. Just transfer it the anti-aging serum machine dock when sufficently gestated and pop in a new knob (sold in convenient 5 pack)

Also his review of the new Star Wars movie was great for trolling people on /tv/

worker bees can leave
even drones can fly away
the queen is their slave

I used to feel about pop culture the way I do now about literature, I was always hungry for explanations and analysis about Star Wars etc. I used to feel about pop culture the way I do now about literature, I was always hungry for explanations and analysis about Star Wars etc. I read fan boards and watched Empire of Dreams, looking for the explanation of why these things were so great, but my curiosity remained.

After a while I began to realize that there were only a set number of production anecdotes to repeat again and again. Watch any nerdtube critic delve into Star Wars kino theory, its always the same script, Kurosawa, Flash Gordon, Joseph Cambell, the end. I picked up books about my favorite pop culture bits but always I came away feeling empty, seeing the same anecdotes in every one. Eventually I began to realize: there just wasn't that much to say, these works turned out to be exhaustible.

If you've ever felt that way, just know, there are artworks without a bottom, that have merited the study of millennia. What is the force, what do Jedis believe, what is the morality of Star Wars. Few even bother to seriously discuss these things. Empty.

Its not that artworks are filled up with meaning by their creators, and some put more in than others. Great art generates its own meaning. Its for this reason they can be described as 'inexhaustible,' they teach rules for creating meaning which we apply to connect them to things. Each era comes to a work of art with its own conceptual preoccupations, ones not necessarily shared by the creators of those things. Works of art endure who can teach us rules for thinking about whatever concepts we bring to it through the system of the book. This process becomes a microcosm for the act of rational existence, the book becomes like nature, a simulation of infinite depth. In this way great art not only entertains or moves, it trains our consciousness to organize itself with respect to the world.

The nerd moves from one theatrical release to the next, always searching for his next nostalgia high, studios gladly ramp up production. If he pauses for a moment, to reflect, what the things he thinks he loves even mean, he is confronted only with an ad for another sequel.

Kantbot's advice:

If you want to take up serious reading dont treat your reading list like buffet of literary history to be sampled, pick one topic to master. Time is precious, reading Mishima, then Carlyle, then Art of War, there's no momentum there, choices must build geometrically. A reading list of 10 classics is worse than one of 10 books about same classic. Doing latter will produce lasting gains, former wont. Your reading knowledge and critical capacity must be trained and disciplined in a structured manner to build up that grey matter. Books arent checkboxes to be ticked on your erudition application, they are not so easy to exhaust, require many viewpoints to discern truly. I wouldn't expect to get a good handle on a book until studyin the author, the era, the genre, and the criticism. These perspectives interlock to create understanding, just read 1 thing in passing and it wont grow roots in your mind, you need to compost.

I still think he's a very smart man. In fact I know he is. But he's the sort to regard spiritual matters through a strictly intellectual remove and won't go near the spirit world in any way that'd make these matters too "real", for want of a better phrase. He needs to consider moving toward a more daring praxis as the years go on. Whatever form that may happen to take for him, as long as it isn't intellectual alone. But that is just this user's opinion.

He isn't really gaining any knowledge if it comes only after studying critiques. This is shill advice.