Believes in metaphysics

>believes in metaphysics
>cant provide evidence of their existence

>asks for physical evidence of a metaphysical claim

yeah that's way more retarded

>thinks metaphysics arent just abstractions one tries to find in the physics to explain phenomenon, therefor non existent

>posts nu-wojak
>browses reddit

does a lawnmower mow lawns?

>implies reddit is inferior and not just a vastly different civilization

>implying mowing is a natural occuring phenomenon

>>thinks metaphysics arent just abstractions one tries to find in the physics to explain phenomenon

These are called "laws," or "principles." See how far you get without them.

>Believes that the non observable abstractions that dictate naturally occurring phenomenon are a farce

This but unironically. I actually like metaphysics and religious studies, it's very interesting if you're not a brianlet, but unfortunately most people are and this stuff is just harmful to them. Look at the altright tryhards with their deus vult shit.

>implying laws are natural and not man made
>implying absolutes exist past the physicality

>abstractions that dictate

>implying the occurrences are adequately thought out, and have reached totality

>Thinks the intellectual character of natural laws renders them inapplicable

>unironically thinks man is outside law and is able to grasp the idea of laws, and self in terms of proper order, rank of theological understanding

scientism thot begone

OP here. The point of this thread was to bait someone into explaining how metaphysics is credible. Instead I got memes. THANKS

bullshit;
show us the youuuuuussssss then "OP"

not our fault you can understand green text discussion

>Believes with absolute sincerity that man cannot understand a natural law

>claims to have truths about the reality that defines our being, implies that they are more than speculative thought, or spectrums of systematic thinking.