Inflammable and flammable mean the same thing

>inflammable and flammable mean the same thing

Learn Latin pleb

> tfw OP is an inflaming faggot

>10 page essay due
>only have 7 pages done
>find and replace flammable with inflammable

bam 3 extra pages right there

Look at this inflammatory faggot.

Please don't inflame the situation

Any thoughts on the valuable/invaluable pairing? Though they don't mean the same thing, they may as well..

have to write a 3 page paper I hadn’t even started on and this worked perfectly, thank you

Valuable is just something that has value, invaluable sort of denotes something being hard or impossible to live without

one comes from flame and the other from inflame?

This really flames my inflamability

>"like" means both to enjoy something and to be similar to something

Invaluable means it's so special that it can't be given a value e.g. a unique archaeological artefact

>centipedes aren't 10 times faster than millipedes

>famous
>infamous

>millipedes

they're often used with the same connotations (as in "highly valuable")

No they're not. They mean different things and can not be used interchangeably. Is your first language not English because I sometimes see foreigners wonder about differences with words like these.

Invaluable does mean what you would expect. Something invaluable has no value, it can't be priced.

>tfw OP manages to be both a flamer and an inflamer simultaneously

these have defined differences as well, Tom Hanks is not infamous

"fish" can be plural without an "s"

now what the heck is that

>Tom Hanks is not infamous
yet

That's a very fishy rule senpai.
Let me swim thru all the information on the Interweb in order to see more of this.

The way my linguistics professor explained it is that the plural with no s (fish) refers to more than one individual fish. Ex: I have to pet fish. The plural with es (fishes) refers to more than one KIND of fish. Ex: we same many fishes at the aquarium.

*two pet fish

to works too

I appreciate it, user, and am ingratiated by the attempt.

>Invaluable does mean what you would expect.
Wait until user discovers that "volatile" means having a high vapor pressure and not "flammable".

>entire book consists of nothing but the words "that" and "had" and various punctuation

is this a thing

Nonplussed and nonplussed mean opposite things.

That That that had had that that that That had had had had a profound effect on that That that had had that that That had.

it's in from PIE *H1en-, not in from PIE *n̥-. Learn your phonological history you dingus

>Tu me manques means “I miss you.”

>had had

>hadn't hadn't

>gay and faggot mean the same thing
>one is an insult and the other isn't
i
don't
get
it

What's wrong with that you fucking anglo

>though, thought, taught, through
English is dogshit

>"fuck me in the ass, my dude" is an actual expression people use

You left out "drought" and "draught"

Have you had any success with it?

>Jew means instigator and victim

Why is it "quadruped" but "centipede"?

In- can mean un- OR "towards", as in, it's "extra" whatever comes after.

>"literally" means "figuratively"

No. Literally, literally figuratively sometimes mean, figuratively.

I would agree with this, where 'valueless' loses its tail in the mouth of EXTREME value: invaluable..

lmaoing @ ur language anglos

There's also tetrapod

MAKE UP YOUR MIND, BIOLOGISTS

This. It really means in-evaluate-able.

Other languages are bad and only mine is beautiful and meaningful
This is Four Channel kid, step it up

What the fucks quadrucenti supposed to mean?

what's the difference? flammable as in burnable and inflammable as in explosively-burnable to say so?

my balls itch

It's akchually unflamable ye illiteracier.

cool, you must be very handsome