Is there an updated version of this with more philosophers in it alongside new ones (Baudrillard, Zizek, Land etc) ???

Is there an updated version of this with more philosophers in it alongside new ones (Baudrillard, Zizek, Land etc) ???

Also history of philosophy thread... Does anyone actually care about reading the canon ?

For me interesting philosophy goes like this:
>presocratics (Diogenes the masturbator...)
>buncha shit
>stirner
>nietzsche
>bataille
>land

Attached: histroy of philosophy.png (2800x2100, 541K)

>For me interesting philosophy goes like this:
>>presocratics (Diogenes the masturbator...)
>>buncha shit
>>stirner
>>nietzsche
>>bataille
>>land

Attached: 1478949435204.jpg (544x496, 23K)

We're working on new templates now

Attached: 44312343143.png (4959x2841, 2.7M)

zizeks needs to be updated

Why?

His face has fallen off

Stroke

Add icycalm
Cue ball or baseball cap not sure which would be funnier

Forgot Jordan Peterson

who has the version with Sam Harris? I pissed myself laughing first time I saw it

It's Bell's Palsy.

This one has a Zizek.

Attached: 1480629005549.jpg (2828x2116, 1.8M)

Holyshit, just when it seemed he couldn't be a worse speaker
God that is sad

He actually speaks better in my opinion. He doesn't sniff constantly now and all his weird facial touching and tics have basically gone.

Fixed it.

Attached: 1520797591416.jpg (2828x2116, 3.13M)

>Darwin, Newton
>no Marcus Aurelius or Hegel

what fresh hell ?

Is there a Wittgenstein Grug?

In the more complete version

Attached: 1518141309928.png (3472x3262, 3.44M)

Has this been confirmed or is it speculation?

Darwin is more relevant to contemporary discourse than Hegel.

Marcus Aurelius is for Reddit pseuds.

Why is the unabomer on there?

Because he is a very famous author with influencial work
What are you a square?

I think the Unabomber and Varg Vikernes are supposed to be /pol/ memes.

Unabomber isn't really /pol/

>presocratics
>Diogenes
FUCK OFF

John Locke and Stuart Mill should be done in the same style as Russell.

this is sort of reddit but diogenes, nietzsche and Heidegger made me laugh

This is true

Doing my disseration on Heraclitus boys.

Fucking brilliant studying a philosopher which academia can't decide what's right and what's wrong about him. I can say pretty much whatever and my supervisor goes "Yeah that seems to make sense."

Why is Freud included here but not Jung?

Because the image in the OP was made before Memerson got famous for arguing with trannies and Jung was still a historical curiosity to everyone here

I read Jung before I read anything by Freud but clearly that's just me. Who the fuck is Memerson?

Even then, what's a psychologist doing on a picture concerning Philosophers?

He's more /pol/ than Veeky Forums.

Can we get one with eastern philosophers?

Besides Confucius, Sun Tzu and Nichiren who is there?

>Even then, what's a psychologist doing on a picture concerning Philosophers?
Not sure if you're talking about Jung or Peterson, but I suppose he's there for the same reason that Physicists, Economists, and Biologists are there.
A philosophy can be derived from his findings and observations.

>Hegel isn't relevant to contemporary discourse
>Whig History isn't relevant to contemporary discourse
>Contemporary ideas of the dialectic aren't relevant to contemporary discourse
Holy fuck you are a dumb stupid man

bc he's a fuckin champ you thot