Are there any philosophers who you believe offer no value whatsoever?

are there any philosophers who you believe offer no value whatsoever?

Attached: download.jpg (198x255, 7K)

all of them

Attached: 5hqofp7e9ac01.png (1080x1129, 1.17M)

This.

no

Every continental """philosopher"""

this

Attached: 1520398385172.png (500x478, 114K)

...

It’s pretty astonishing that on Veeky Forums of all places that Derrida is the number one whipping boy. He’s the the most lit mfer in philosophy.

Butthurt Anglos are popping out of the woodworks
Ignore them, their whole movement is based on a severe inferiority complex after being confronted with the individual genius of Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger

Attached: hegel.jpg (276x361, 32K)

Attached: ecwZW77.jpg (620x637, 67K)

Attached: jpeeee.jpg (233x216, 8K)

Wittgenstein
Heidegger
Sartre
Derrida

Though I wouldn't say they offer NO value, just very little, and most of it is value in the sense of how not to approach philosophy.

Attached: ourguy.jpg (283x178, 7K)

Attached: 0oas9.jpg (300x168, 9K)

Kristeva
Russell
Kripke
Chalmers
Dennett
Althusser

Should this wonky figure even be called a philosopher?

Attached: ab1111.jpg (286x176, 6K)

>Peterson
Not a philosopher.

Attached: 2q=.jpg (275x183, 5K)

Attached: mahman.jpg (274x184, 8K)

Attached: poooe.jpg (272x185, 7K)

We're talking about philosophers you fucking retard.

Attached: zzzz.jpg (275x183, 5K)

Epicurus

Attached: 220px-Peterson_Lecture_(33522701146).png (220x262, 60K)

Attached: 1222222222222222222.jpg (318x159, 4K)

The eterson spam is real

Attached: images (1).jpg (275x183, 6K)

how should you not? CARE to give any insight?

Attached: messiah.jpg (295x171, 7K)

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 67K)

Attached: jpvortex.jpg (300x168, 5K)

He's the new Nietzsche!

how many centuries have you contentials spent trying to justify your backwardness?

Attached: retard light.png (1200x900, 159K)

First post? BEST post.

Attached: the_water_boy.png (343x315, 160K)

Peterson obv

ye he good

The second coming of Nietzsche

Yeah, all the ones who deny the existence of God.

Rand. Without a doubt.
>philosopher

for you most, because reading them would allow you, maybe, to see that your question has absolutly no value in relation to philosophy because you fail to define the meaning of value. but try again, what do you mean by value?

Murdered OP with philosophy. It has value to the individual. The more well calculated and reasoned philosophical ideas there are, the closer we get to understanding the workings of the universe.

Attached: 1519391621655.png (550x543, 50K)

Kierkegaard
de Saussure if he counts.
Rawls
Every major figures in the continental tradition except Husserl, Heidegger, and Foucault.

Which continental philosophers have you read?

This.

>de Saussure if he counts
I wouldn't say he counts but how has he offered nothing of value? He is an extremely influential linguist and in fact a major influence on Foucault, who you exempt.

Honestly so sick of hearing about this charlatan.