Le individualist baby boomer that consumes antidepressants on a daily basis

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 55K)

Why is it a problem for him to consume anti depressants?

Why are ad hominem the only things people can criticise I’m with?

>Why is it a problem that a baby boomer who shills radical individualism has been consuming copious amounts of antidepressants for decades

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 29K)

1) he consumes antidepressants probably because he battles autoimmune disease and has watched a daughter grow up with rheumatoid arthritis. Most people don’t suffer that much, but even if they did:
2) he doesn’t “shill” individualism to make people happy, he regularly admits that life is suffering. He tells people that collective victimhood isn’t the answer to suffering, and it only propagates more. You wouldn’t understand that though because you’re too busy wallowing in your own romanticised misery to see it.

Why does it make you angry that people’s lives have improved off the back of his advice?

Explain how your life has improved, redditor.

Well, considering he is selling a program to “cure the chaos” it seems kind of odd that he relies on a medication to cope with life.
>claims you can tell what people really believe based on how they act
>claims to believe his metaphysical notion of truth
>he relies on products from science to live
>he acts as if he believes in the rational materialism conception
>he doesn’t really believe whathe is selling
People can find whatever usefulness they can from him, but it is silly to pretend like he has anything close to a coherent world view.

Get what you can from his lectures and stop idolizing his "work". He's a mental midget that relies on a specific lexicon to convince half-baked societal rejects of their faults and how they can improve their worthless lives.

He appeals to the lowest common denominator, i.e. people who are captivated by the rat race and politics and living in a fantasy world.

>He appeals to the lowest common denominator, i.e. people who are captivated by the rat race and politics and living in a fantasy world.
unfortunately that's the only way to convince normalshits of anything. normies don't give a fuck about real intellectuals, they want something to appeal to their emotions and tell them what to think. I'm sure Peterson could level up his game, but he doesn't want to on purpose, in order to indoctrinate normies into his cult as opposed to other cults. His simplified rhetoric triggers me sometimes but I do think he's the lesser evil compared to neoliberals and pseudo-marxists

Yeah his Maps of meaning is pretty good. His never stuff is basically an appetizer for that.