What's this Kunt's problem? Why can't he write like a fucking normal human being?
What's this Kunt's problem? Why can't he write like a fucking normal human being?
because he's writing philosophy
read his essays that are intended for public consumption, dickhead
So if I spout a bunch of nonsensical fluff I too can be a philosopher?
By that definition, it looks like you already are one.
fucking roasted mate damn there's a philosophy lesson for ya
>Why can't he write like a fucking normal human being?
too bigbrained
tfw bigbrained
Parlour trick. If it's obtuse and difficult it must be profound.
Kant is patient zero for the autism virus. He was picking up on tachyon interference, a kind of retrocausal Van Eck phreaking of the communications between nanites that form the postsngular noosphre of 2087.
It caused him to write like a robot.
he was a god
but
op is a loser
Have you read any of his lectures?
shut up nick
This nibba writing on the noumenal level. Plebelets only on the phenomenal baka
Because he's not a human being.
I was just complaining about this exact same thing. I thought I was going to get some extracurricular reading done this spring vacation, but I spent literally two days trying to read the "the transcendental doctrine of space" so I could get the annotations right, and I still don't understand what the fuck he's saying.
t. brainlet
The transcendental aesthetic is pretty straightforward. Just read Parsons analysis if you're not getting it (but skip the math parts)
I have literally no idea what you people are talking about. Everyone's always going on and on about how fucking difficult Kant is.
Look, I understand that Hegel is difficult. That's obvious to me. And I'll admit, Kant isn't as easy to read as, say, Hobbes. But I thought that's because he's talking about more complicated things.
What is it about him that's hard? I just don't understand. I read Critique of Pure Reason in like a week cause it was interesting.
You're right on all accounts. But I remember how I struggled reading it in school, I think I was 16. Now I'm 24 and it fucking flows like butter (once I let go of my junk and am in "productive mood"). I think the final maturation of your brain to adulthood helps you get this stuff.
Prussian censorship
Kant is nearly mathematical on his approach. I can't see how people struggle so hard. Maybe don't start with the Critique?
Also, having previously read easier topics like political phil would probably help, because I don't think most people find his way of writing hard, it's actually a pretty hard subject in itself he is dealing with. Actually, when you start to "get" it you will realize how good of a job Kant has made in clarifying what would be otherwise unapproachable topics of discussion.