Where do I start with Deleuze? I want to get into a thousand plateaus

Where do I start with Deleuze? I want to get into a thousand plateaus.

I heard Spinoza is important but any others that are seminal? And is there a recommended order for reading Deleuze's works?

Attached: image.jpg (336x500, 51K)

Dunno dun care. Just skip Anti Oedipus. It's complete shit.

Empiricism & Subjectivity -> Kant's Critical Philosophy -> Nietzsche and Philosophy -> Difference and Repetition -> Logic of Sense -> What is Philosophy? -> Capitalism & Schizophrenia

Attached: 720B386C-62E9-444F-9C6A-79F09B1E7855.png (1125x1677, 3.75M)

Nietzsche and Philosophy first! Absolutely!

Everything is there, his whole treatment and approach.

>deconstruct your mind with LSD
Powerful

Why would you want to get into Deleuze in the first place?

But I'm halfway through
Really?

Fucksake guys you better be wrong

Attached: 1511980956115.jpg (180x191, 6K)

Deleuze was an anti-Christ and you should avoid him

u are complete shit

antioedipus is a military textbook

quads of mastery

keep reading it until u get bored, finish it if willfuly
keep reading deleuze and authors who deleuze has read, and the ones he influenced
then come back to antioedipus and realize it makes total fucking sense

antioedipus was an event, badiou should understand

>muh exogen chemicals

if you are open to read about homosexuality you could check The homosexual desire by guy hocquenghem to check an application of the dispositiff deployed by antioedipus

limitless applications

cmon fight me get on my level

not even op answering
u dont read books u dont know a shit about french poststructuralism

Just dive right the fuck into it and look up the meanings of words you don't mean until you understand it.

Is this a good reading order? Or is right?

Waste of time. Read someone who can think and write clearly.

he can do both, you just can't be an analytics fag or you won't get anything being shown to you. Its literally esotericism explained as clearly as possible. He was a mystic materialist and his work was his rite

Like Jordan B Peterson or Donald Trump

Okay, please explain to me one clear and interesting thought he put forward. Would be great if there was also some reason given for believing it, but I realize that might be a bit too much to ask.

Try starting where he ended.

if you think there is anything worth reading behind all that retarded french exclusivist prose, you are sorely mistaken