G-guys? ;-;

they can't

Attached: Stalker.webm (958x720, 2.94M)

Anyone know what Tarkovsky read of philosophy and theology besides Dostoevsky?

Read his diary and his film theory book, it's full of references to stuff he read

This is (deliberately) the most accessible film of Tarkovsky. You are all proudly weaving the pseud flag.

If it's the most accessible it doesn't mean it's not good you filthy plebeian

i am disappoint

Attached: sad kitty in bowl.jpg (768x1024, 137K)

his diary, senpai-a-lam?

bergman > tarkovsky

earnest self-insert > arty-farty rambling

>arty-farty rambling
But i like that aspect of Tarkovsky...

I just watched this film, I love it!

>and Andrei’s wife
One one hand we got this film, on the other we lost Andrei

I love Andrei Rublev and the Mirror, but I love this so much that I am uncertain whether or not it’s greater then Andrei Rublev.

Unrelated but does anyone else hate that faggot Malick? I can't stand his fucking movies.

Nostalghia is better

>he judges art based on how many other people enjoy it
Disgraceful.

It was based on a book called Roadside Picnic

he didn’t say that

He implied it.

I don’t hate him but he infuriates me. He is always shy of having something truly great but never truly makes it.

Thats an uncommon opinion. Why do you prefer Nostalghia?

Because there’s less metaphor, and it’s a more intimate, more personal work that deals with the deeper mysteries and the psychology of its characters instead of big dramatic concepts (like Stalker) . All of this while retaining the sense of scale and ‘universality’.

Malick is hit or miss.

But it's free on youtube?

>liking things based on how "exclusive" they are
The true mark of a pseud

Andrei Rublev would be great if they didn't put gross boobies in it YUCK!

Tarkovsky doesn't have any inaccessible films. He doesn't try to hide any hidden meanings or anything.

Is this thread Veeky Forums related?

Attached: 1508389088649.png (620x640, 278K)

They filmed around an abandoned chemical plant so a lot of it is real

Not every indoor scene

Attached: Jägala_HEP,_Sept_2009.jpg (5271x2200, 2.97M)

Attached: everystockphoto-2953133-o.jpg (975x1388, 86K)

Andrei Rublev was my favorite of his.

Attached: AndreiRublev_USSR_1988.jpg (800x1222, 308K)

I think kino should get a spot here, shit like Bergman, Tarkovsky, Eisenstein, ect; if only because you literally cannot talk art films on /tv/, they make our brainlets look like scholars.

>go to /tv/
>it's a bunch of threads about dumbass kids movies

/film/ is probably never going to happen, so we might as well designate screenplays as "literature" if any good discussion is going to happen

marketa lazarova >>>>> andrei rublev

One more experiment.
Experiments, facts, truth of higher instance.
There is no such thinhs as facts.
Expecially here.
All this is someone's idiotic invention.
Don't you feel it ?
But you, of course, must find out whose invention it is.
and why.
What good can your knowledge do ?
Who is going to get guilty conscience because of it? Me ?
I have got no conscience.
I just got nerves.
Some bastards would criticize me, I get wounded.
Another would laud me, I get wounded again.
I would put my heart and soul in it, the gobble up both my heart and soul.
I wouuld relieve my soul of filth, they gobble it up too.
They are all so literate.
They all got sensory deficiency.
and they are all swarming around, journalists, editors, critics, some endless broads.
and they all demand: more. more !!!
What hell of a writer I am if I hate writing ?
If it is constant torment for me, a painful, shameful occupation, sort of squeezing out a hemorrhiods.
I used to think that someone would get better because of my books.
No, nobody needs me !
In two days after I die they will start gobbling up someone else.
I wanted to change them, but it is they who have changed me.
Making me in their own image.
The future used to be just a continuation of the present, with all the changes looming far behind the horizon.
Now the future and the present are one.
Are they ready for it ?!
They don't want to know anything !
All they know is how to gobble !

Stalker: Gush ! How lucky you are ! My goodness, now .. You are going to live a hundred years !
Writer: Yes. But why not forever ? Like the eternal Jew.

>Is it a good monologue?

It has a literal pleb filter in it you dummie