What's the most potent redpills in bookform known to man? Something that'll blow my head wide open

What's the most potent redpills in bookform known to man? Something that'll blow my head wide open.

Attached: etsubatsu.jpg (562x561, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

redpillhandbook.com/
washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

dunno if you're talking existential or what, but I'm halfway through this, and it's literally (yes literally) flipped my entire perception of human history around.

Attached: br.jpg (1600x1341, 282K)

Your least favorite religious text

ideological text*

My diary desu

The Communist Manifesto desu

Prepare ur jimmies for maximum rustling

Attached: 5BEE9B10-FDB3-40A7-8DFF-892BA8D2CE83.jpg (319x499, 32K)

You already know the answer.

Attached: 20160831_110254_macdonald.jpg (508x350, 29K)

the sad answer is that to be red pilled you need to have read the entire western literary and philosophical canon and a lot of history so you can detail a world image for yourself. Otherwise you'll be an ideologue with unchecked belief

>What's the most potent redpills in bookform known to man? Something that'll blow my head wide open.

Avoid modern fiction with hardcovers, large titles, and munted pages. They are almost universally not worth your time, especially if they're a NYtimes bestseller.

Oh shit, I thought you were asking for redpills ON bookform. Carry on.

Is this a reliable source on what was really going on before Columbus?

Attached: book Illuminatus1sted.jpg (259x384, 27K)

read Stirner and you won't ever be the same

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.u2.jpg (800x522, 31K)

Ted's manifesto

Mainlander's The Philosophy of Redemption.

Read Euclid and find out all the cool math stuff that the jewish agenda is trying to hide from you through New Math.

Your opinion of science will never be the same.

my favourite book is lord of the rings

Dont go too quickly

Attached: Therealofficalreadinglistofhis.png (996x1190, 1.7M)

The fuck is a redpill?

I've heard people use the word, but all it seems to mean is "blame the blacks/jews for everything"

...

>science is hiding special math in books that everyone can and has read who attened private academies

The childish notion that you can find a single idea that alters your view on the entire world. Or, more commonly, something vaguely smart sounding that "proves" your already held opinions.

the book of mormon

building 7 fell from the bottom and the fire was on the opposite side from where the debris hit, only one support column failed but the whole structure fell at terminal veocity, every single office involved with the initial impact of the north tower on the floor of impact was run by either Kissinger and Associates or businesses owned by Maurice Greenberg, Jules Kroll, David Rockefeller or David Cohen

1984 and animal farm are some good starts (assuming you havent read them already)

>not this and 1421

Attached: 512XyM-57WL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (333x499, 58K)

Take the blackpill

Attached: 61gafoq4XBL (1).jpg (907x1360, 82K)

more like the gaypill lmao

thus spoke zarathustra
depth charge to your soul

Attached: nietzsche wagner.jpg (1000x691, 147K)

>liberal unknowingly validating Spengler
I love it

This. Coming from years of reading philosophy and academics, ted broke my mind with such a clear and honest manifesto. I had lost myself in the vapid ramblings of weak, deceitful philosophers and ISaiF set me straight again in one hour. I doubt there is a book out there that will blow your head like that because ISaiF is both right and brutal. It's usually either/or.

It sounds like an even more edgy In the Dust of this Planet.

redpillhandbook.com/

wagner :'(

The term came from a movie directed by two trannies about a black man who gives enlightenment to a computer hacking white guy in the form of a red pill. He then wakes up and finds himself in the "desert of the real" and realizes everything he knew was wrong. The whole thing is a work of the closet and can be viewed as a metaphor for gender transition. The antagonist even continues to call the protagonist Mr. Anderson despite his adoption of a truer name: Neo.

Ironically, taking the red pill is the conservative/traditionalist equivalent of the progressive's "being woke."

post more of your body

Attached: conceptofthepolitical.jpg (1280x720, 88K)

Lmao

Basically normies and midwits have the most banal weltanschauung so whenever they learn something that is even slightly unusual they feel like their entire world had been shattered and that they have discovered god knows what unspeakable truth so they coined the term "redpill" to describe this process

Attached: Becker.jpg (175x278, 8K)

lite but good

Attached: diet pol.jpg (333x499, 60K)

Industrial society and its future by Kaczynski.

I just looked up a PDF and read the first couple pages. Damn...

THE UNABOMBER'S MANIFESTO

you will not regret it, and it's a quick read

Attached: DVcGXnBW4AAwTpW.jpg (462x462, 48K)

TECHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY+PROPAGANDA+DECLINE OF THE WEST+INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE+SIMULACRA AND SIMULATION+UNDERSTANDING MEDIA+SPEED AND POLITICS+VISION MACHINE+THE QUESTION CONCERNING TECHNOLOGY+KAPITAL

that’ll do you in for good

My gf watched that unabomber show and loved it and I mentioned she should read this without having read it myself. Should I be worried?

You don't need a redpill for that, nor any other pill either. Just a good tab of LSD. That will allow you to see through all the bullshit spewed forth by all the pill slingers, red and blue.

Lmao I read all of these in the past 6months, except for spengler, and it certainly did me good. I highly recommend

Thanks for the suggestions

>reading everything but spengler
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

Wrong a red pill is just something that alters your perspective showing you the truth, there isn't one red pill to take.

if you read the others you’ll realize he was an autist and didn’t understand techne fully, that said one should read Man and Technics just because its interesting to see how autistic psychopaths view the history of techne. Technological Society+Simulacra and Simulation will disabuse someone of any vain attachments to Faustian civilization

stripping off the veneer of society to discover the truth of reality

washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

enjoy op

Easily Gore Vidal.

and after that, all you are is just a man.

Attached: 1520901627804.gif (500x500, 971K)

Good advice regardless

>something vaguely smart sounding that "proves" your already held opinions.
Imagine misrepresenting a view this strongly on a Nepalese cornucopia-making anonymous image board.
The purpose of it is that it challenges the views you had, not affirms your previously held position.
Confirmed for never having watching the matrix.

low IQ confirmed

and i still have a bigger dick than you

>book about America
>flipped your 'entire perception of human history'.

I hate Americans.

you have to go back

14 yr old from affluent "america light" country, get laid and realize no one cares what you like, even less about your precious hate.

post your dick, lardass

Holy shit this has some pretty great quotes. I'm particularly fond of "Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men."

Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis

Attached: never.jpg (1920x1080, 75K)

This, and The Trial (Kafka), Brave Nev World (Huxley) and
Fahrenheit 451 (?).

>not realizing that Spengler was wrong about his metaphysics but right about viewing civilizations as organisms with determinate lifespans, and with "souls" aka characteristic belief sets
>not realizing that technology may progress but it doesn't really change how human beings interact with each other, just the mediums they do it through
>not realizing that simulacra and simulation validates Spengler's claims by positing that our current culture is an empty expression of an idea that died a long time ago, aka not a reflection of reality
>not realizing that Technological Society is right that our culture is dominated by technique, or efficiency, but that the Unabomber is wrong about technique killing culture (technique is caused by a dying culture)
>not realizing that Spengler predicted the rise of the age of efficiency as a sign of a dying Culture

Also you're more attached to Faustian civilization than I am. Spengler views Faustian civilization as a tragic character that's already poisoned, it just needs to finish dying. Personally, I find it harder to commiserate with something that's already dead. Those who view Culture and Technology as one and the same thing see Culture as constantly progressing. This progression, this reaching out to grasp the infinite, is the expression of the Faustian soul in its purest form.

Those are not historically accurate, they're Historical Fiction with bases in reality. Fairly buggered controversy within years of their publishing, though they're well-known to be bollocks.

this.

The Bible

This is a good humble redpill.

More or less the red pill from the Matrix, the one that teaches some wisdom you've been missing, alters your perception of reality, or drastically changes your life.

>The women you catch watching you are clever and calculating, trying to incorporate use of you into their life. The ones who don't aren't as trustworthy (they are more... flakey, unpredictable?), but are more honest/sincere with you.

>Human society is deeply-seated fantasy. There is no basis for anything humanity does beyond animal survival, except what we choose to believe.

>The anthropological claim that the Jews' ancestors started a race war with Caucasians' ancestors ~70 000 years ago after having their settlements nearly destroyed , their women raped, and children killed or eaten. This isn't a "secret Jewspiracy" but shown through evolution and the exchange of symbols and ideas throughout storytelling like mythologies and folklore.

>The tyrant ruler is the one you're not allowed to speak out against.

>Women are born to be fucked. There are ~3.5 Billion women on the planet. If you can't fuck a woman you find attractive, the problem lies with you.

>You are what you eat. This is common knowledge. Ever notice how plants smell different depending on the soil they're planted in? Human bodies are the soil, and what you eat changes how you smell. Eat lots of red meats? You smell like shit, or decomposing cooked meat. You eat fruits and veggies but no grains? You smell like fungus. You eat all carbs, or sugars and chocolates and candies and pop? You smell like fucking garbage. And that first impression thing? That's directly impacted, because humans pick up on scent long before it's noticed consciously. You can shower 10x in a day and it won't change a thing, because the smell's coming from inside you. (Deathbreath fits here, too.)

>How you think about the world, and how you talk to yourself color your perception of the universe around you. If you think miracles and luck are common, they'll become common. What you focus on becomes a larger part of your life.

>Magic is real, it's just nowhere near what it's portrayed to be so the average person is protected. Almost every single human born in a western country knows most of the symbols and words, and types of magic, and how to use it, but they don't know they know. The East is much worse, they know they know, but don't know how to use it. Perhaps I've said overmuch here.

>Animals other than humans, and even plants have thoughts. Animals have emotions, as well as consciousness.

>"God" as the Jews, Christians, and Muslims see it, is the same thing. We've known it, worldwide, for millennia. Every few hundred years it comes to the forefront of humanity in the conscious awareness of the masses, and causes huge turmoil and upheaval.

Attached: cabbalah russian yggdrasil.png (353x613, 315K)

That last one

Attached: xThinkstockPhotos-541588360-1280x427.jpg,qv=1497530198.pagespeed.ic.RstPpzxZIt.jpg (3865x1289, 348K)

>>Think of your cells. Now your organs. Now your body as a living organism, a sentient being made up of various systems. Mobs are said to act on a semi-blind collective consciousness, rather than individual composition. What about local ecology? Ecosystems, biomes? Do they self-regulate? What about bodies of water and weather? Remember the Gaia Hypothesis? If a planet is a living system, what would that consciousness be like? Same as humanity, or beyond what we comprehend?
>To that end, look at the solar system. The galaxy. The universe. If everything in the entire universe was part of a single living system, and it had some kind of balancing awareness of itself, what would that be called? God?
>To go one step further... how do you respond to the needs of your individual cells? Does a person with cancer just tell their cells to stop being cancerous? If you can't drop down that small difference in orders of magnitude, why expect "God" aka the entire universe to dictate or prevent individual cases of what one type of animal perceives to be evil?

>If we think of tech level on a Kardashev-like scale, humanity as a whole reaches an output of something like 16 TeraWatts. We're still stuck in Country mode, albeit they're far more unified now than even a couple hundred years ago.
>The Type 1 Society uses ~10 000TW and essentially has the power of a single planet figured out. Humanity can't even in2 Continental governance yet. We should not be trying interplanetary shit, we should be figuring out how to use what we have already. We haven't even delved the depths of the tectonics, or the oceans, or mapped out 100% of the planet. What reason could there be for such a push to space...?

>If you play the observation game, you're left with who you aren't. Who is reading this? Who is thinking? Who is watching that? Who is reporting, and watching that? Keep going, you'll get there eventually.

>Where did you come from? Why are you here, now? Where are you going? Who are you? Why?

>"God is dead." doesn't mean God keeled over, it means humanity no longer has any reason to stay beholden to beliefs in some mystical other coming to save our mortal asses. It means we have agency, and can be fully accountable for our selves; thoughts, emotions, actions, words, and all the rest.

>You can learn to do anything better than the average person in 20h or less by using the 4 alchemical processes. You can even be a weeb and do the FMA thing, cutting it to 3. Assess what you have, analyze what you need, deconstruct what you have, rearrange what you have to better suit where you're headed, refine by the grind (or by practice, or revision, or whatever).

>Why does anyone listen to a bankrupt accountant, or an economist who isn't rich as fuck? Didn't they spend years learning how money works?

>Trump became prez. Although he got money from daddy, he lost it & got it back. Several times. If he's so incompetent and unintelligent, what are you doing with your life?

Attached: yggdrasil.jpg (357x448, 81K)

>Jews are missing 1/3 of God
>Muslims are missing 2/3
They're closer than most though

Muslim is the way to go, it's the only religion that believes it has been one, single, God all along.

Justify it with Platonism/Aristotleianism and lets get this ball rolling already.

That pic is a bit unnerving.

>the caucasians are good and jews are bad
wow really great redpill

here I have one:
>the Germans are evil and the non-Germans are good
ah good, very wise, nodding sagely
>God is dead." doesn't mean God keeled over, it means humanity no longer has any reason to stay beholden to beliefs in some mystical other coming to save our mortal asses. It means we have agency, and can be fully accountable for our selves; thoughts, emotions, actions, words, and all the rest.
it means idealism died and signs will eat your soul you fucking nigger
>Why does anyone listen to a bankrupt accountant, or an economist who isn't rich as fuck? Didn't they spend years learning how money works?
idk why would they listen to a schizophrenic fed post?
>Trump became prez. Although he got money from daddy, he lost it & got it back. Several times. If he's so incompetent and unintelligent, what are you doing with your life?
As of the mid 2000's Trump's wealth was in doubt and this only went away when Fox and the RNC started to shill for him. His businesses were funded by Real Estate mafia people, casino mafia, elite shadow finance people and defense industry people. his entire career started by buying a CIA asset's casino franchise which as owned by Meyer Lansky, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers

whoever made this is subhuman and needs to have every bone in their feet broken

>it's the only religion that believes it has been one, single, God all along.
Well... no. Original versions of what's now the Qur'an were revised and rewritten by many different authors. A couple pieces of originals have been shown to have different styles and dialects from different periods written over one another on the same page. They had a pantheon, but the older authors were smart about the way they named everything, so it could look like one or many (a "clever" style of writing adopted from various hindu/buddhist scholars).

Wow really great faggotry.

Here, have moar:
>u r niggerjew :)

>whoever made this
A deity, beyond human, without feet.

Attached: 1520307698078.jpg (476x616, 63K)

That's completely false. The original author was God, you absolute degenerate, and the original scribe was Muhammad.

The fact of the matter is that God is one, and believing in any of the two preceding Abrahamic religions is incredibly show-sighted and narrow minded, because those two, even more than Islam, present us with the logical conclusion 'God' in the sense we know it from Nietzsche, does not exist in the future.

FUCKING SAUCE
NO SAUCE NO ARGUMENT

Honestly you all treat Islam like it is all that different from Christianity. If it is - it is only in the Hegilian sense, that it isn't characterized by kindness and niceness by as many people including Bertrand Russell have pointed out was justified by necessity.

I have seen muslims bring up morality into it as if that is what it is really about when in reality everything that happened to Muhammad was, and can be justified by the expression: it is necessary. Why were the jews killed in Yathrib? It was necessary, why was Mecca reconquered? It was necessary. Why was the prophet arab, necessity of course. In that sense it does match up closely with the Nietzschean master morality idea, because all morals are decided not by who gets conquered but who conquered. See Jizya.

>main person of Christianity leads an impeccable life
>critics don't try to say he was a bad person, just try to say he either didn't exist or didn't do X

>main person of Islam fucks a 9-year-old

Yeah dude they're the same

>aren't all that different
>the same

I see you also watch Rick and Morty

for interpersonal relationships and friendships, after I read "the heart is a lonely hunter" (and partially after re-reading the catcher in the rye with an open mind) i just started looking at people differently. im more understanding toward people's flaws and i understand how other people think and react emotionally to things. i also cope a little bit better with being lonely.

sorry. let me try again

>main person of Christianity leads an impeccable life
>critics don't try to say he was a bad person, just try to say he either didn't exists or didn't do X

>main person of Islam fucks a 9-year-old

Yeah dude they aren't all that different

It does.

Every political philosopher has liked the idea of Islam much more because it fuses government with religion. An absolutely impossible idea to overturn.

It also outlaws usury completely, and pigs. Both of which are good for curing corruption in politics, and overpopulation (due to pigs being correlated with extremely late cases of agricultural development).

right, because who could ignore that by the accounts of the bible Mary would be about 13-14 years old. Which also heavily implies the main charter of the bible i.e god commits statutory rape.

Just because you haven't found the critics means you really haven;'t been trying hard enough.

>God has sex
see you have to not take the Bible at its word in order to get that. I can just read the Quran and Muhammad will be very frank and admit he fucked a 9-year-old, because he didn't consider it wrong.

Also I know their are critics of the Bible. But most of them don't criticize what Jesus himself does.

>Muhammad will be very frank and admit he fucked a 9-year-old, because he didn't consider it wrong.

It is not even in the Quran, it comes from accounts from some guy who knew some guy who knew some guy who knew who heard she said and he said.

yeah, but in every Muslim state you will notice this very Marxist theme where the ruling class ends up interpreting the laws and the Quran to suit them. Case in point, the Abbasids, the Ummayuds, the ottomons, even the Iranis and Saudis. The Abbassids even had pet philosophers and neoplatonists to justify their lurid lifestyle. I'm not saying Islam is better or worse, I'm saying it justifies everything the ruling class does and passes it off as morality.

such a waste of an opportunity

The specific age comes from a generally accepted source among Islamic scholars. In the Quran it's clear she's still pretty young.

what Quran are you fucking reading. She isn't even mentioned in there you fucking Pleb.

Not by name no. There are revealed verses.

Screw it, Don Quixote. That wasn't the crux of my argument. When I wrote that I was thinking of Alawis who also believe in a trinity just like Christianity.

My main point is that a religion that follows after Muhammad vs. after Jesus are going to be very different. That being said, I hadn't ever really heard of the Alawis before. They're still very far from Christianity, but the trinity (different trinity than Christianity apparently) and the consecration of wine and bread are familiar.