Why cant women into anything but fast fashion, bros?

why cant women into anything but fast fashion, bros?

Other urls found in this thread:

rickowens.eu/en/SE/women/section/all?f[seasons][]=153&view_all=true
rickowens.eu/en/SE/men/section/all?f[seasons][]=153&view_all=true
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because they're not into looking avant garde, they just want to look cute. Fast fashion stores have what they want. why pay any more?

For the same reason why they suck at cooking, building things and making art; they have no vision, ambition and individuality.

Because they lack the level of autism present in men.

If this was really the case why would so many high fashion labels have such a huge female division. Fucking moron

lol if u think this is remotely true. prob because you don't know any girls irl

...

Whoa wearing all the rick and RAF womenswear then?

>autism present in men.

i.e prevalence oh higher IQ's.

androgynous men

Men are the geniuses etc in society, women tend to be average IQ, and are all hormonal and stuff, It is not the purpose of women to do other stuff apart from being beautiful, loving, mother and wife or the neighborhood alley cat if they chose.

noone
willing to bet rick/raf menswear sales are 10x that of their womenswear lines

Because they have too many options that are always changing.

and still they dress better than you cucks who spend $1000 on pants that make you look like you shat your pants

>this is what most of you actually believe

jesus fuck

get a grip

The fact that OPs extreme lack of knowledge about the fashion industry isn't being ridiculed by you guys really says something about the state of the board.

If you can't understand that we would have literally zero haute couture & niche fashion lines for women if OP was right, then there's really not that much we can do to help you.

If you can't understand that these companies have created clothes for women for decades because it makes them money... Then nothing we say can really help with you being this retarded.

Did we just get invaded by /r9k/ or what happened?

so cuck'd

what ur saying is completely right, but when was the last time u saw a girl wearing rick owens or raf simons? they're male dominated brands, thats the point i was making

when was the last time you saw a human wearing rick? i've never once seen anyone irl wearing either of that shit.

man girls must love a nice guy like you

back 2 reddit

you must not live in a big city then

>number of maidens I defended today: all of them
>number of maidens that rewarded me with sex: :(

The best designers are men for a reason.

>The best designers are men

Source for that claim? Especially for something as objective as design?

It's evident, just look at the top dogs of any time.

This is just because men are over-represented in the amount of geniuses in comparison to women though, if you look at any field men are always at the top because there are more genius males than females.

>men
>invest time, effort, and thought into some particular field or hobby
>have at least a relative level of understanding on the subject
>when someone asks what they're passionate about they name off whatever this thing is since they have spent at least a little bit of active effort into learning about it

>women
>only interests are drinking, spending hours being entertained by snapchat filters, and wasting time and money at the mall
>someone asks what they do in their free time and they dont want to say boozing it up or dicking around on their phone so, seeing the large pile of garbage they call clothes on the floor of their messy, smelly apartment, they say 'im really into fashion' in some desperate attempt to seem interesting

and then some thirsty ass fucking loser comes along and entertains the idea by saying things like 'yeah wow! you do have pretty good fashion sense! i've never seen anyone wear that before you definitely dont look like han solo! wow! im afraid if i dont keep complimenting you then you wont sleep with me wow!'

stop being fucking losers guys.

>how Veeky Forums wishes they dressed
>how Veeky Forums dresses
>individual and unique

you can literally only pick one

Why can't /r9k/ into anything but ranting about women bros?

Feminism has made a lot of angry/disillusioned men.

>Feminism has made a lot of angry/disillusioned men.

This, I mean imagine if woman hating MRA'S/MGTOW's were the dominant movement instead of feminism, what result do you think that would have on women?

where the fuck is the guy being a nice guy or defending women? he's literally stating obvious facts.

>>>reddit

8/10 post. I like it.

average women dress much better than average men
women in fashion industry are equals to men in fashion industry

Triggered

>anecdotal evidence
Jesus just stick to wanking to Rick, discussion is futile on this shitty board

>the guy
>not samefagging

Better Google how to use that color matching tool in MS paint

I thank God everyday that I'm white and not a woman.

that's absolutely not true lmao

Why cant teenage boys on Veeky Forums into anything but hypebeast streetwear?

They have tits and vagina. You can wear a $5000 outfit but still can't bang a girl wearing a $22 outfit.

...

Nah, this guy is right, the influx of /r9k/ and /pol/ isnt doing anyone good, especially considering that OP's image has Veeky Forums's 'i just recently got into fashion' starterpack designers.
Back to the women hate threads on /r9k/.

what the fuck is "fast fashion"

fashion hasn't changed since the 1930's nigga

we all been wearing the same shirts and pants since dizzy gillespie blew his bent horn or whatever.

they can but the women who are into actual fashion isnt some high-school bullied 16 year old shut-in who spends his time on an anime imageboard. and rick is still fucking retarded

>being this mad

She is probably on her period, don't be so rude.

because women in general are not passionate about anything, they have hobbies but they don't put effort into those hobbies, that's why arts, sports and science are dominated by men.

also women are a lot more desperate for social acknowledgement so their hobbies tend to be what's trending at the moment and what allows them to show off, so: clothes, being a nerd xD, gym, dancing and so on

holy shit this makes so much sense...

>doing every single thing in favor of sex

you gonna stay virgin for a long time with this attitude kiddo

Are those autism shoes?

im not mad neither women. the are people who actually learn/know about fashion and work in the industry. 99,9% of this board is underage neet using fashion for seeking validation only and because of the echo chamber they actually belive they have anything to do with it.

>what the fuck is "fast fashion"
lurk moar, newfag

>because women in general are not passionate about anything

How can you generalize like that? I seriously hope you are just trolling and really not that out of touch with reality from constant imageboard browsing where people only post cherrypicked negative things about women.

it's true. women passion and men passion are completely different. just watch men with football and tell me women behave like that with anything. i can give you 100 more instances.

i'm not saying it's a bad thing, that women are inferior for it, i'm just speaking out what i see. i'm also not saying it's an inherent trait of women, that they're born that way, it's probably the way they're raised, but it is what it is.

Do you actually have any scientific research to back your statements up or just anecdotal evidence?

i literally said
>i'm just speaking out what i see

how the fuck would a research be conducted on something like that anyway?

Scientific evidence is a misogynistic and racist white male concept you shitlord

you ever see the focus and determination in a koreans eyes when they do manicures and stuff?

>i'm just speaking out what i see

Then you should know that it has 0 value. You might as well have written "hurr durr".

Because fast women like fast cars and fast fashion :^)

opinions are not allowed here anymore?

hmm, i wonder why women's fashion week is bigger than men's. Could it be that high women's fashion is a bigger market than men's?

Only the ones I agree with.

I barely know anyone, male or female, who delves much into fashion in person.

If you're judging by here you're both coming across a selection bias given that Veeky Forums is largely male, and ignoring the countless male threads asking about fast fashion on here.

Nice meme.
I'm still right, though.
Sorry if that makes you feel bad.

rickowens.eu/en/SE/women/section/all?f[seasons][]=153&view_all=true

>375 items

rickowens.eu/en/SE/men/section/all?f[seasons][]=153&view_all=true

>377 items

hmmm, don't know about male-dominated

Rarely see any niche fashion in my town though. Just Geobaskets, and no Raf. Still quite evenly distributed...

>don't know about male-dominated
ricks aesthetic is pretty manly
nobody wants a ninja gf

are you homosexual by any chance?

...

...

...

All those female Rick fits are garbage.

post fit, fuccboi

It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.

This makes them incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything, and the reason for it is, I fancy, as follows. A man strives to get direct mastery over things either by understanding them or by compulsion. But a woman is always and everywhere driven to indirect mastery, namely through a man; all her direct mastery being limited to him alone. Therefore it lies in woman’s nature to look upon everything only as a means for winning man, and her interest in anything else is always a simulated one, a mere roundabout way to gain her ends, consisting of coquetry and pretence.

It is natural for a feeling of mere indifference to exist between men, but between women it is actual enmity. This is due perhaps to the fact that odium figulinum in the case of men, is limited to their everyday affairs, but with women embraces the whole sex; since they have only one kind of business. Even when they meet in the street, they look at each other like Guelphs and Ghibellines. And it is quite evident when two women first make each other’s acquaintance that they exhibit more constraint and dissimulation than two men placed in similar circumstances. This is why an exchange of compliments between two women is much more ridiculous than between two men. Further, while a man will, as a rule, address others, even those inferior to himself, with a certain feeling of consideration and humanity, it is unbearable to see how proudly and disdainfully a lady of rank will, for the most part, behave towards one who is in a lower rank (not employed in her service) when she speaks to her. This may be because differences of rank are much more precarious with women than with us, and consequently more quickly change their line of conduct and elevate them, or because while a hundred things must be weighed in our case, there is only one to be weighed in theirs, namely, with which man they have found favour; and again, because of the one-sided nature of their vocation they stand in closer relationship to each other than men do; and so it is they try to render prominent the differences of rank.

Every one who can see through a sham must have found this to be the case. One need only watch the way they behave at a concert, the opera, or the play; the childish simplicity, for instance, with which they keep on chattering during the finest passages in the greatest masterpieces. If it is true that the Greeks forbade women to go to the play, they acted in a right way; for they would at any rate be able to hear something. In our day it would be more appropriate to substitute taceat mulier in theatro for taceat mulier in ecclesia; and this might perhaps be put up in big letters on the curtain.


Nothing different can be expected of women if it is borne in mind that the most eminent of the whole sex have never accomplished anything in the fine arts that is really great, genuine, and original, or given to the world any kind of work of permanent value. This is most striking in regard to painting, the technique of which is as much within their reach as within ours; this is why they pursue it so industriously. Still, they have not a single great painting to show, for the simple reason that they lack that objectivity of mind which is precisely what is so directly necessary in painting. They always stick to what is subjective. For this reason, ordinary women have no susceptibility for painting at all: for natura non facet saltum. And Huarte, in his book which has been famous for three hundred years, Examen de ingenios para las scienzias, contends that women do not possess the higher capacities. Individual and partial exceptions do not alter the matter; women are and remain, taken altogether, the most thorough and incurable philistines; and because of the extremely absurd arrangement which allows them to share the position and title of their husbands they are a constant stimulus to his ignoble ambitions. And further, it is because they are philistines that modern society, to which they give the tone and where they have sway, has become corrupted.

rick owens is bullshit though.
yohji (or yoji) is so-so.

complete goth slave look. ugly.

Thanks.

For the unnatural position of privilege which the institution of monogamy, and the laws of marriage which accompany it, assign to the woman, whereby she is regarded throughout as a full equivalent of the man, which she is not by any means, cause intelligent and prudent men to reflect a great deal before they make so great a sacrifice and consent to so unfair an arrangement. Therefore, whilst among polygamous nations every woman finds maintenance, where monogamy exists the number of married women is limited, and a countless number of women who are without support remain over; those in the upper classes vegetate as useless old maids, those in the lower are reduced to very hard work of a distasteful nature, or become prostitutes, and lead a life which is as joyless as it is void of honour. But under such circumstances they become a necessity to the masculine sex; so that their position is openly recognised as a special means for protecting from seduction those other women favoured by fate either to have found husbands, or who hope to find them.

they seem male dominated because they're fetishised by internet fashion culture like Veeky Forums, reddit and other fashion forums - which are notoriously very male.
Assuming you're not just generalising and actually believe 100% of women interested in fashion are only into fast fashion, my mother was a rick fan long before i found Veeky Forums. She owns multiple books about his shows and showed me a $150 brace she bought from him roughly 12 years ago when i brought him up.

>I am into le fashion and so unique girls only like h&m
>my fave designers include rick, raf, yohji

Is Comme des Garcons is actually good or it's just a meme?

men lead women follow

women dont pioneer or take risks, buying into the safely trickled down stuff from zara for example

most girls i know think quantity > quality. if they do go for designer it will be a bag or shoes rather than clothing. people will see the brand logo on their bag or the red soles on their louboutins but not the label in the back of their dress and of course many don't care about the value of designer clothing beyond the status symbol

that being said, the average woman wearing h&m and zara still looks better than most men

1.women generally aren't Veeky Forums dressedbytheinternet autists
2.women need a large number and variety of clothes for a variety of reasons

that pretty much covers it

lmao
>Rick is for men >:(

...

Why would women need more clothes than men?

Why does anybody even care about fashion?

traps

3rd guy looks like he doesnt want to spend extra money on bags at the airport so he just put on everything

lol'd

with the 1st one people would bully you to death irl even in a big city. 2nd looks okas but the guy would look even in black h&m and vans. 3rd is okay but bit awkward.

>>le gym is a hobby

I wish this weren't acceptable. It's like saying wiping your ass is your hobby.

jesus fuck how did this board end up so fucking backwards - was it always like this?
I've only just noticed but maybe that's because I've never bothered to click threads like these,
seeing as they're not actually fashion related. Loaded thread - let's discuss my ridiculous
/pol//r9k/ opinions under the guise of fashion.

Do ANY of you have social lives? Honestly you clearly have never interacted with the average human being other than your family,
let alone women. So do you just spend all your savings on designer brands and sit on the computer all day?

Duuude you're gonna get so much pussy once all the girls see how you defended them on Veeky Forums, bro!

If I wanted to hear the opinions of sluts I would have asked them, this is a man only thread, you got that?

>thinking this is whiteknighting
No women browse Veeky Forums. If I wanted to impress a girl, I'd go up and socialise with her because I don't have autism. This is a fashion board, for the discussion of fashion, and cunts like you bring your ridiculous fucking political views in here and shitty fashion tastes with it. If you were interested in fashion in the slightest you'd know that it is a FEMALE dominated industry, including high fashion. I bet you can't name 5 designers without meming.

what is this cancer and why is it being reposted in the thread?

because of sexual dimorphism
women attract partners through their looks while men can also do it with materialism (source of food/safety)
and the wardrobe is part of the look so something in that way
but it is changing rapidly