Is 80s Axl Veeky Forums? What happened to this aesthetic?

Is 80s Axl Veeky Forums? What happened to this aesthetic?

rise of jeans so fucken low, look like girl jeans

Nah that look is so derivative

Shit band with an asshole lead singer

This aesthetic evolved to something more meaningful - into Saint Laurent Paris.

Haha. Makes it look like he doesn't have a dick

Izzy dressed the best out of all of em, but he was basically just a Keith Richards clone.

Wrong decade, son.

where are his testicles

>implying glamshits have testicles

die

Too bad he has (had) a better vocal range than 99% of mainstream singers

>Too bad he has (had) a better vocal range than 99% of mainstream singers

Why is that bad? Isn't than generally considered a good thing?

I like his singing. Appetite for destruction is one of the best rock albums of all time. Saying otherwise is just being contrarian

Is it time for men's crop tops to be brought back?

in general hes been considered a huge cunt and has been coasting on his previous success.

He has also completely wrecked his voice

it died thankfully

Not really, Guns 'n roses has always been complete horseshit, cheap pop-rock

yes

t. contrarian

is this casablancas on heroin

>implying axl didn't fuck more bitches than ever male in your family combined.

You don't know shit and should keep your mouth shut. AoD is easily one of the top 10 rock albums of all time. Rose had a better vocal range than 99% of other rockers out there.

>look at me i say something is shit just because its super popular and general consensus says it was good.

Kys you hipster fuck

Not him but I find Axl Rose's voice incredibly irritating and his lyrics are fucking banal rock and roll tropes. Anyways, having an impressive vocal range does not make someone's music good or even listenable.

He looks like a faggot.

>What happened to this aesthetic?
number nine literally had a fucking show based solely on axl rose