Slavic neonazis

Democracy also killed Russians on a massive scale.

>democracy also killed the Russians

This never happened, redditor.

To be fair if the Slavs weren't considered subhuman they would have made the best fascists

>traditional
>god tier women (need to be preserved)
>willing to go to war
>able to invoke panslavism
>historically strong leaders

its not hard to imagine slavic fascists but Hitler was a tard
pic unrelated

Not one bit

Slavs wouldn't be considered subhuman if they weren't pants on head retarded.

The few slavs that weren't completely retarded (croats, bulgarians, ukrainians) actually collaborated with the nazis in WW2.

>This never happened
yes it did

t. killed by mafia in 1993
youtube.com/watch?v=WtUO5cXZhV4

>bulgarians
>ukrainians

>not completely retarded

You fucking idiot, Putin controls the country with an iron fist. It's not a democracy in the slightest sense.

Stay the fuck away from this board if you want to spread toxic revisionist lies.

u wot?

Yes I'am a Slovak and we had a Catholic Fascist state during that time
However

>these slavs subhuman
>these slavs not subhumans

See where Hitler is a tard?
Nazi racial policy is very inconsistent

If you think Russia is entirely a democracy, you really need a wake up call.

>Putin controls the country with an iron fist
>In 1993

no your an retard

The former USSR wasn't a democracy either, roflmao.

the point was that even under a "democracy" (note scarequotes) russians kept dying-off like it was nothing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Cross

Why did Hitler consider the slavs subhumans but not the Japs?

The Nazis learned really fucking quick that they couldn't maintain their racial policy and still fight the war. They ended up compromising a lot of their ideology after they invaded Russia because they were so short on men. Hell, they had literally tens of thousands of Russians fighting in the Wehrmacht and even SS, and the late-war Heer/SS was a multicultural wonderland.

Okay but to say it was a democracy is like saying a wolf in sheep's clothing is a sheep.

His views of the Japanese were inconsistent and did include regarding them as subhuman.

Ultimately, because they were a bit player in his Weltanschaung.

Because Hitler's ideology wasn't so much blind racism as a brutal, practical approach to making Germany a self-sufficient world power.

In WW1, one of the driving reasons for Germany's defeat was that they couldn't feed themselves once the Royal Navy blockaded them. They tried to fix this by colonizing the Baltic, creating a state called Ober Ost, but that ended up being a drain on resources. Even with the locals forced into labor crews and put on starvation rations, the region was still a net loss to Germany. Occupied Belgium was also a drain, as was Austria Hungary, because the Hungarians refused to feed anyone but themselves and the Russians sacked the breadbasket that was Galicia in 1914.

Hitler's solution to this problem of not being self-sufficient was brutally simple, and not too far removed from the forced deportations that took place in WW1 with respect to potentially subversive minority groups. Seizing upon anti-Slavic and anti-Polish sentiment that was already present in Germany, it became really easy to dehumanize the slavs and set the groundwork for subjugation and eventual extermination to free up resources for the German people. And the terrible thing was that it actually worked, briefly. By drawing in resources from occupied territories (particularly Russia), food shortages in Germany in WW2 never got as bad as they were in WW1 until after the war had ended.

I recon that just like communism evolved to cultural marxism

fascism should lose its racial components and become cultural fascism

The racial policies of Hitler was just dumb on so many levels as previous posts say

Should have continued the post in the manner of Stallman.

I don't trust what you're saying. I don't trust anyone who claims to know about WWII and precisely what happened during it. I have been feed too many lies about it to even begin to trust new information concerning it.

m8

>envious of

Who could that be?

>the year is 1993
>vladimir putin rules the country with an iron fist
>despite not becoming pm until 99

1. National Socialism was extremely anti-communist. Non-Russians with little reason to love the soviet union will like the USSR's mortal enemies more just naturally.

2. They are farther removed from Nazi oppression than they are from communist oppression.

3. They aren't Nazis in a literal way. They take the ultra-nationalism, anti-communism and anti-semitism, along with the symbols and language, but they don't have some sort of developed racial theory. So long as you are happy to throw gypsies, jews, faggots and Russians into an oven, you're golden.

I usually don't post because of the inferior quality of the debate, but now have a very nice documentary on this topic. They kinda explain their motivation and every facet of the phenomenon. youtube.com/watch?v=zbH2omJbuzw

Both of you are retarded and need to install gentoo.

Contrary to their antisemitism, Nazis never really made explicit Anti-Slavic propaganda which makes it possible for some retarded Slavs to identify with them. By the way, the Nazis didn't think Slavs were a race so it's arguable whether the term "Anti-Slavism" applies for Nazis at all. They thought that a certain percentage of the people living in the East was of Nordic or other valuable stock, while the rest were composed of more primitive European sub-races or of Asiatic influences.

>that tried to wipe them out

I don't think there was such an intention.

Pole here.

Our neonazis have urban legends like "Hitler said he would win the war after he saw what we did during Uprising", "Poland would be better off if they'd agree on the demands Hitler gave them"(because it worked so well for Czechoslovakia) and other things like that. So the ideological basics for slavic nazism are Hitler's anecdotes and completely misinterpreted history, like it or not.

Now there is the less retarded part of them that basically applies nazism but with the shift towards Slavs, as in Slavs=a race of supermen(or race to breed supermen from - if we're talking about rare case of literate nazi) instead of Germans and then the same old thing. I don't know how many of them there are.

The third part that's usually lumped in the "neonazi" category are our local fascists but I think I don't have to explain what's the problem with it. They tend to have nasty tendency to glorify nazi collaborators though, so there might be a reason why they're lumped together into the same group.

Now those 3 groups - deluded Hitlerites, Nazi-converters and fascists tend to associate with each other hence the clusterfuck around them.

Then of course you have tons of edgelords and plain old hooligans who like the imagery of power related to nazis or are looking for good excuse to riot. And I wouldn't be surprised if they were the majority here.

One of the things that drive them is, at least I think it is - you have people who have relatively collectivist tendencies but the PC culture of the western left is something completely retarded for them and communism has bad rep in the region(do I even have to explain why?) so the only thing that's left for them is fascism/nazism. So this is more of an unused political capital and I think that the likes of Putin succeeded by learning how to use it.

I assume it's the same in Russia or Ukraine or whatever.