Who was the most Veeky Forums philosopher?

No one wants to say it, but the correct answer is Peterson.

No.

Michel Motherfucking Foucault

>Peterson
You mean that aging, shrill-voiced joke of an "academic" who built his career of a minor kerfuffle with SJWs?

No thanks, let's post some actual philosophers.
I bet you don't even fucking know who this is.

soren kierkegaard
first existentialist
social critic, especially of the civil religion plus handsome

>”no” to Peterson
>posts a nonwhite “philosopher”

The only reason anyone would reject Peterson is if they feel Peterson isn’t anti-jew enough.

kanye

this

>still being a racist soyboy
lol, neck yourself
tell me who this is
don't google it
here's a hint: he got more pussy than you ever will

Deleuze is my primary inspo for when I turn 40.

>not taking the Agamben pill

Solid fit but why's everything a size too big?
C'mon Georgie y'ain't that fat

...

definitely not this

this

comfy af. jacket sleeves too long tho

...

>no photos, just a shitty doodle Engels did
What is this, Veeky Forums circa 2016? Btw, Stirner is a shit philosopher who got fucking bodied by Marx

Handsome for sure but he's basically the Nintendo Wii of philosophers.

yeah, he's really remembered as an anecdote to marx. only weird edgy libertarians and teens take der einzige und sein eigtum seriously.

First of all, he's not a philosopher. Second of all, he has no statue whatsoever within psychology beyond being a professor. His papers haven't been cited by anyone and there is no interest in his ideas among serious academics

>i'm smart because i know about some obscure nigger "philosopher"

It's true. If Marx hadn't dedicated so many pages to owning him in the German Ideology, Stirner would be a footnote.

*Stature

...

when you hear someone say “human nature” in public

Lmao he was trash

...

ugh obviously not any critical theory postmodernist bullshitters, cos making up verbose bollocks is not fashionable. the most Veeky Forums philosopher is probably kierkegaard or like, nozick or something.

Biofirepower

Cioran, obviously.

no Derrida, that guy is full of shit

He died quite young, he didn't get the time to write a lot of stuff philosophy-wise. Also, that kind of rhetoric is Sartre's, who didn't like him for the sole reason that Camus was anti communist-expansion. So it's a bit overblown.

Good answer.

Second only to Lynch in the poofy hair game.

S A D B O I

Depends on what you're going for.
In general the most Veeky Forums is definitely Camus. If you're looking for a more a sadboi look I'd say Cioran. If you're looking for an in the closet look it's Foucault. Derrida and Kierkegaard are also pretty Veeky Forums.

I got a list here that I'm gonna come up with on the spot
1) Camus
2) Derrida
3) Cioran
4) Heidegger (if you're looking to go Nat Soc)
5) Kierkegaard

I also want to shout out my boys Hunter S. Thompson and Jack Kerouac for not being philosophers but still being pretty Veeky Forums authors.

Based Schoppy

>schopenhauer
heuh
(thats the sound I make when I throw up)

Literally only one correct answer here.

*blocks your path*

When you hear someone play semantic word games for an hour

That's OJ Simpson my dude

...

>mde in a philosophy thread
Your argument is void

he really say this shit?

*schniff*

Yeah it was him. He was a primitivist, you should look it up. He was emotionally driven but his conclusion was correct even if the methodology he took was unscientific and irrational.

but user....he's a psychologist, not a philosopher.

While indeed bringing him back into the public spotlight, it's widely agreed that Marx did a poor job both of portraying and "bodying" Stirner.

I'm also willing to bet a fortune neither of you has read either of the books.

Yes

...

My man ludwig effay

Hit kids isn'f effay, fampai.

>it's widely agreed
[by whom?][citation needed]

Feel free to quiz me on The German Ideology btw

youtu.be/wLHCuzW3-uA

you brainlet soyboys get so hard at the slightest chance to parade what few heroes you have

so whats this got to do with shooting up a buncha babies

>anarcho primitivist
>literally had brain damage due to anorexia
Sounds about right lmao

>no interest in his ideas among serious academics

Implying any important person has any interest in the ideas of "serious academics" in the humanities.

like 80% of "seriously academic" papers are never cited by "serious academics", let alone read by actual people who do something other than read papers.

Peterson's ideas are not very original or "formal" but they are broadly applicable and accretive to the practices of clinical psychology, evolutionary biology, and self-improvement. Insofar as that remains the case, it is unimportant that "SeRiOuS aCaDeMiCs" in meme studies departments respect his work.

>career academic that has never produced research with applied or heuristic value
>acktually that isn't important because maps of meaning has good reviews on Amazon, also the behavioral sciences aren't real sciences anyway

I agree that Marx fumbled the ball on trying to "body" Stirner. Stirner made Marx look like an ass and pointed out the flaws in his plan and Marx's response was pretty much "no u loser"

oh

possibly the least effay man alive, he fucked stunk

Current.

entirely wrong

I hate to break the news like this but Bertrand Russell is no longer with us

Ernst Cassirer. Pretty sure David Lynch is copying his style.

wtf is that vest??

R E I

correct

so-so

no

He free'd them from slavery. Primitivists reject society on the basis it's slavery
Can you cite your claim about that? None of my research indicates that anorexia caused him brain damage
12160.info/m/discussion?id=2649739:Topic:1072085
dailydot.com/crime/sandy-hook-adam-lanza-kaynbred/

the power duo

...

While mentioning him on here is stupid, calling him "aging" as an insult is pretty weak if most other people posted in this thread are dead.

>got more pussy than you ever will
First of all, I doubt that, second, If he actually was a bigger fuccboi than me, his opinions probably have no worth

There is only one god.

Y'all plebs

>not a literal god
You filthy bean eaters

Aren't all philosophers really just homosexual losers?

No.

Yes they are

No they are not.

>He still hasn't realised that homoeroticism is the path to engligntement.

>enlightenment
>philosophy
I don't see how these go together, except if you are a buddhist, or something

Yes they are you fagoot loving fuck

No.

Holy shit isn't it past your bedtime, kiddo

thanks for massquoting you fucking redditor

No, mom.

Please don't participate in philosophical discourse when you know nothing about it, mere Veeky Forumsg.

/thread

yes it is
clearly you weren't struck enough as a lad
hence why you're such a fag