Is this fa?

Is this fa?

Attached: Untitled.png (766x430, 671K)

Other urls found in this thread:

soundcloud.com/jewishness/santocas-volodia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_tower_shooting
cnn.com/2016/07/25/world/japan-knife-attack-deaths/index.html
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pittsburgh-school-stabbings-20-students-injured-in-knife-attack-spree-at-us-high-school-9248774.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570996/At-27-dead-109-injured-gang-knife-wielding-men-attack-train-station-China.html
rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/attack-09302015174319.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting
youtube.com/watch?v=m5XzQ1BS7gU
apa.org/research/action/speaking-of-psychology/dispelling-myth.aspx
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What do you think?

activism is moderately effay

TIME IS UP WHITE MENNNN

Attached: 1521762226843.jpg (720x968, 72K)

el goblino...

la creatura...

I just don't understand these people. They want to ban guns but they don't want to say it. Is it just that they are too pussy to admit it? On top of that, the US has a culture issue, its not about laws or having weapons.

el ogre de americas...

el arcangel de los mixtos...

Fidelcore

>Is it just that they are too pussy to admit it?
My guess is they don't want to be shot for saying that. They're already getting death threats.

Dykes and Mexicans aren't effay.

Gun control is a losing issue. The far-left antifa types are against the government confiscating guns and most right-wingers are as well. There's only a very narrow band along the neo-liberal->progressive->socialist axis of the political spectrum that is in favor of banning guns.

They want their 5 seconds of fame without saying too much that might turn that fame into mostly infamy and ridicule.

Secondly, most gun-control opponents flat out do not understand guns, have never shot guns, do not live in areas where legal gun ownership is high, and do not understand all the reasons why most Americans are pro-gun. This is how we get stupid made up categorizations like "assault weapons" which boil down to "scary black rifles that can accept magazines" and weird restrictions on rifle capacity, length, etc.

NO PASARAN

soundcloud.com/jewishness/santocas-volodia

>US has a culture issue
well it's a combination of that a large proliferation of guns. Handguns and semi-automatics specifically. If shotguns and bolt actions were the only firearm allowed you straight up could not get a high kill count.

>US
>culture

Attached: 1513344205677.jpg (250x211, 5K)

If shotguns and bolt actions were the only firearm allowed you straight up could not get a high kill count.

This is not true at all: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_tower_shooting

People have gotten high kill counts with knives ffs.

Culture issue? The vast majority of gun deaths are due to suicides and gang shootings.

Banning guns is horrible uneffay. Liberial activism is mfa tier attention whoring.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_tower_shooting
>literally one of the only examples
yet every other mass shooting is done with a handgun or semi-auto dipshit

hmm really gets my noggin joggin

Attached: 8c76v8c7.jpg (1021x775, 251K)

>schools want to implement mandatory IDs and clear, visible backpacks
>students immediately flip-flop and start bitching about how practical solutions infringe on their rights and individuality
>btw give us ur guns XD

Attached: Shrugging-Man.jpg (400x266, 54K)

>mandatory IDs and clear, visible backpacks
>practical
Except its not, it's retarded and won't solve anything.

>Treat every student as a criminal instead of going to the root of the problem
retard

>IDs and clear backpacks are treating students as criminals

Slow down there Boss Hogg

>the root of the problem

gl with changing the worship of mass consumption and the 24/7 news cycle cult.

>no privacy
>armed guards ready to shoot you
>armed teachers ready to shoot you
Yeah, sounds like a perfect learning environment for decent people.
retard

There is a solution, but americans are too concerned with shooting eachother and buying inane bullshit to see it.

Still proves it can happen you flaming faggot

It doesn't make any difference retard. Like I said, nothing is preventing people from getting high kill counts with pump-action shot guns or bold-action rifles.

You can drive a truck down a street and kill dozens of people before you're stopped like in the UK.

How is visible backpacks not a valid solution?

There are a ton of examples like that retard. I just gave you one because that's all I needed to prove you wrong.

>treating every gun owner as a criminal

Why do you think he immediately jumped to armed guards and teachers? There are literally high school kids on this board, don't forget.

La Reina Mejicana...

True but still. There's a problem when the only thing stopping mass shootings from hqppening are laws. Anyway, banning semi auto guns won't stop mass shootings, like you say it would only make the kill count lower. That's fucked up.

Well, there's already a problem with the learning environment if every few weeks there's a school shooting.

Looks okay, but I'm not really digging the guitar head attached to her shoulder.

>Treating someone that owns an object designed to kill multiple people in seconds as a potential criminal is bad, but treating children as criminals isn't
It's a valid solution that robs students of their privacy. Its a shitty solution that fucks students over and fosters no change, just a shitty learning environment.

>There are literally high school kids on this board
Assuming you're from /pol/, which of course you are, boy do I have some bad news.

I'm not , but I do think its funny how you stopped responding after that post. I guess armed guards and teachers are just too difficult for you to shil as a good thing?

And slapping the legal equivalent of a bandaid is not going to help.

No one has brought up armed guards or teachers but you my man

>And slapping the legal equivalent of a bandaid is not going to help.
I don't even know what you are trying to argue but that's EXACTLY what I've been trying to say. Banning guns is a bandaid, not a solution. The problem is that students keep wanting to shoot up their schools. The solution has to revolve around the cause. Guns are not the cause.

Suicides are about 60% of gun deaths but gang crime is only like a twelfth.

A twelfth of the remaining 40%, I should say.

I'm against both, but prefer banning guns over fucking kids over. Both "solutions" are an admission of failure and definitive proof that the american goverment doesn't give a shit about the well being of their citizens. The actual solution would be to magically cure all americans of their inherent insanity and direct more resources and actuall effort towards bettering the amerilards mental health, but that's pretty much impossible in current US.

This is why a feel that keeping guns makes since as liberal. There's only emotional reasons to being pro gun. Muy safety(from groups they hate)

I wanna keep my guns for hunting, you're the one using emotions to argue your point.
Safety has nothing to do with my reasons to enjoy my guns.

No one is trying to take your guns away, they just want to make it harder for you to kill people en masse

There's only emotional reasons to be anti gun. Muh safety (from groups they hate, like law abiding gun owners for instance)
Also
>Muy
guess there's no surprise there...

>the absolute state of fast fashion
just end me, senpai

I want to believe you, I really do. Thing is, I never heard what's the plan to make sure I'm gonna keep my guns, because so far all I've been hearing is
>we wanna take away your guns

US doesnt have a culture most kids are wannabe thugs now that have daddy issues and listen to the shitty rap that is trending at the time

That is culture my man.

>there's only emotional reasons to be anti-gun

Are you retarded? Literally like every statistic available on the subject supports that gun-bans lead to lower gun-violence.

I'm pro-gun because I like the ability to own and carry guns, but you'd have to be literally retarded to think there's no logical benefits to banning them. And yes, the argument can be made that they'd still come in illegally from mexico/south america, but logic dictates that rather than using that as a reason to not ban them, we should have tighter border security, be harsher on illegals, and ALSO ban guns. Stop making pro-gun people and gun owners look like retards please.

they just want to make it harder for you to get them: pass severeral test and all do it periodically so they can check that you are not out of your mind, put an actual safe system on how you keep your guns so other people cant take them background checks.. all that stuff
most countries actually have guns, but they are much more regulated thats all

also kill yourself with your so beloved gun for hunting

Attached: 1498500252384.jpg (158x152, 7K)

kek okay faggot

Yeah, what said. This is why the left treats people who support right leaning views like they're ignorant.

Literally only the most extreme of the U.S's lefties are proposing nation wide gun-bans. They only want guns banned in major cities with huge populations, and that's already the case for most of them anyway. As far as owning guns in rural/suburban areas goes, they just want to make sure the schizophrenic social reject who will use it to shoot up a school doesn't get his hands on one.

If you follow the law, aren't part of an extremist group of racists/religious crazies or a street gang, have no arrest record and are mentally sound, and don't live somewhere like NYC, you would still have no problem getting a gun if democrat rhetoric were applied to gun licenses and purchasing.

The reason you hear from a lot of alt-right types that they want guns completely restricted is because they have a conspiracy theory that the left is going to make it harder and harder to get guns a little bit at a time until it's impossible to get them, because muh jewish/minority led authoritarian government conspiracy.

>they'd still come in illegally from mexico/south america,

Its the other way around my dude. The US is a massive arms dealer for cartels.

>Are you retarded?
(You)
> Literally like every statistic available on the subject supports that gun-bans lead to lower gun-violence.
That's the thing: I'm not interested in having greater knife related violence statistics instead, followed by a knife ban, and a surge in the acid attack violence numbers.

>kill yourself with your so beloved gun for hunting
I can't because the cannon is too long. If you knew the first thing about guns and gun laws, you'd know suicide prevention is the reason the minimum canon length is set at 18". Pretty safe to ignore the rest of your ignorant rant too

(((You)))

>i'm not interested in having greater knife related violence instead

Go kill 30 people at once with a knife, let me know how that goes. Most likely you'd manage to stab one person, probably not even fatally, before being apprehended or killed.

It's a pretty good trade off.

She's the ugliest Cuban I've ever seen. All the Cuban girls I know are kind of hairy but at least take pride in their looks. I'm betting she's actually Dominican but because they're irrelevant she adopted some Cuban heritage idea because of muh gommunism.

>I'm bad with knives so everybody else must be as well
This is what you sound like

Go try getting 30 people with a knife in a hour then faggot. Prove him wrong.

No, what it sounds like is that you play too many videogames if you think someone would be able to do as much damage as a mass shooting with a knife. Gun laws are about minimizing the ability to perform mass shootings primarily. Attempted murders of individuals will always happen, but mass shootings are avoidable.

You're delusional if you think a school knife attack will result in more than 1-3 deaths. Most likely an injury or two.

>a man with a knife is capable of being as deadly as a man with an AR-15
>Also if they ban knives people will start throwing acid on my face oh god pease i need my fully automatic grenade launcher to defend myself from my gardner
This is what you sound like

Are U guys larping or R yall serious?

cnn.com/2016/07/25/world/japan-knife-attack-deaths/index.html
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pittsburgh-school-stabbings-20-students-injured-in-knife-attack-spree-at-us-high-school-9248774.html
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2570996/At-27-dead-109-injured-gang-knife-wielding-men-attack-train-station-China.html
rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/attack-09302015174319.html

Furthermore, in Japan where guns are all but impossible to get, they do occasionally have attempts to murder indiscriminately at schools with knives.

They have a hilariously simple solution to this, the teachers have and are trained to use wooden poles with a half circle shape on the end. They basically use this to pin the knife-wielding assailant down by surrounding him with the poles. It's been proven to work.

If you're worried about gun/knife attacks against individuals, well, if someone really wants to murder they're going to find a way. It's not preventable. Our country's students being slaughtered for wanting to learn is avoidable though.

>people injured in knife attacks by huge groups of people wielding knives so for some reason we shouldn't ban guns!

Total death in those articles would be multiplied by 10 if guns were involved, and they would've been if they weren't hard to get in those countries. I don't understand your argument.

>Stabbing spree in a country with nearly no civilians with guns or means to defend themselves
>20 injured, no fatalities
>at least 10 attackers
>Various attackers
nice try, though

Also, in a knife attack you can like.. run away. I'd much rather be caught in a mass knife terror attack than one where the perpetrator has firearms. I think you'd have to be insane to disagree with my sentiment there.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting

Is this possible with a knife? No.

>Our country's students being slaughtered for wanting to learn is avoidable though.
I don't think that's what's happening and if that's the rhetoric you're pushing forward, the real underlining issue with the motives behind those tragic acts is neither going to be identified nor understood.
If anything we have to consider school-shooter as our ennemies and as such, understand their motivations to address and curb them.
I can guarantee if you sincerely think their motivation is their hat and intolerance for "students wanting to learn", then the problem is only going to manifests itself again in a different way, and it's going to be on you.

>Holy fuck they really killed all those bystanders with knives!? Imagine what they could do with boxcutters in planes...

I don't literally mean they were killed for wanting to learn. Jesus christ man, read between the lines.

I don't know/claim to know what the intentions are in every school/mass shooting. I'm saying we can avoid letting our country's children die en masse, regardless of the reasoning behind it. An individual with a knife will do far less damage than an individual with a gun attempting to indiscriminately kill at a highschool or somesuch, was my only point there.

So you didn't mean it but you still said it because you thought it had a greater emotional appeal. Ok, I get you.

Also, I don't know if you're the same guy who was arguing that banning guns would result in higher knife crime statistics, but here's the deal incase that is you.

Banning guns makes it harder to kill tons of people. Not impossible, no, but much harder. We should strive to make it as HARD AS POSSIBLE to do this shit, this will result in it happening less often. Yes, other weapons will be used, but someone is going to be a lot more intimidated by the thought of doing something that will most likely result in their own death with a knife, than with a gun.

It's possible for an unarmed person to fight someone off who is wielding a knife. It's possible to get the knife from them. It's much harder for them to make sure they've killed someone. They're much less likely to survive doing this when police arrive. They have no way to quickly kill themselves if they want a way out after the killings, it's much less likely they'll have a serious impact by attempting it.

And the most important aspect, it's much less likely that your kid will be killed one day while attending school for simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

You can't possibly be this dense, you're either refusing to accept your arguments are shit or trolling.
>omg its because school shooters are carzy!
Wow, just incredible deduction there. The point of stronger regulations is to keep crazy people from getting firearms

Your 9/11 retort is just pathetic my dude. I guess you're for open carry in airplanes as well? Why not completely deregulate all gun ownership? Who knows when the scary box cutter boogieman might strike?

No, you just apparently are mildly autistic and can only comprehend english if it's spoken in the exact literal meaning. Sorry dude, i'll speak literally for you from now on.

>Our country's students being slaughtered for wanting to learn

lol doesnt america have the worst public shool education system in the world???

i dont think anyone actually goes to school to "learn"

Attached: 1514238353381.png (168x234, 64K)

I don't think they go to get shot either

You know about the rubber band trick?

youtube.com/watch?v=m5XzQ1BS7gU

Is hyperboles the only form of expression you know of ? Jesus Christ I swear...

>maybe we should look after our classmates better and stop bullying
>FUCK THAT BAN GUNS

Depends on the area. We have decent public schools in certain areas. Usually the richer areas.

The U.S is too big/diverse for you to classify our entire school system as bad. Schools are generally run at state level. Where I went to school (public highschool in longisland NY, second wealthiest county in the U.S iirc) the education was quite good, and we had 10+ students go off to ivy league schools in my graduating class.

Im anti gun, but why the fuck is clear backpacks a shitty environment?
I've actually never thought of it because i don't live in USA, but it seems really smart.
the only downside is for women and their tampons, but they can just get a small black pack if they are embarrassed.

uhhh well maybe u shouldnt be forcing whties and mudskins together then

rly makes u think

you can run from a knife, you cant run away from a gun idiot.
if you try a mass stabbing, most likely some roid rage man is gonna crumple you with a chair

>most mass shooters are white
indeed, whites truly are the niggers of race

>you cant run away from a gun idiot.
This is how I can tell you've never fired a weapon, let alone at a moving target.
Why is it that the people who are the most afraid of guns are those who know nothing about them? Really makes you think about the nature of intolerance, doesn't it...

You're making an unfounded and ignorant assumption, and not a reasonable deduction, mr rational thinker.
apa.org/research/action/speaking-of-psychology/dispelling-myth.aspx

el goblina*

la goblina, dumbass. And no bully plz

Why tf is the white girl barefoot

cuz she's one of 'those' people

I think they have a stylist team(edited)
paid for by activist organizations
if you see them in public
like almost all of them have 70s hippie shit or just normie shit
it's supposed to invoke feelings of social reform like spring of love, or the MLK era
get gen x and boomers to feel for them
"Wow they're just like me when I was a kid!"

I know this is a fashion board but when I was in high school there was like a dozen kids who brought guns to school everyday and we all learned fine. No one was hurt. The white high school anime watcher\video game nut is the problem here quite clearly.

Is it me or they all look like psychos? Especially the right-most guy. He looks like he's going to shoot someone himself.

Xir pronouns are xer, xir, xeirs, don't be transphobic bigot calling xer "it" like xer was a thing and not a member of personkind

They all look like the type of individuals to get drunk on power.
From left to right, short blond girl will assault her uber driver, dead eyed chubby chum will rape his sister's passed out friend at some party, short dyke will commit electoral and financial fraud on her second term as president of her student union, limp shoulder puppy eyes will probably be the one who roofied the girl his chubby chum raped, and tall twink will probably poison his neighbour's dog or something.

Appropriation of punk rock characteristics to shill a political statement. Hell nah

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-02-17 at 5.54.44 PM.png (728x736, 437K)

>being pro-2A means you are an alt-right pol-tard
Wew, the absolute state of this country.

literally not at all