Reasonably, what will the world look like in 2200?

Reasonably, what will the world look like in 2200?

I'm talking borders, economy, demographics, and technology

I honestly dont think Pakistan will still be there as it is now in two hundred years.

map it´s wrong about United States of America
It will be Los Estados Unidos de America

Same for Europe. If this muslim immigration keeps up it'll probably be some sort of islamic calipate, definitely not a "european federal union"

...

1)Most Hispanic immigrants learn English before they're dead, or by the very next generation.

2) Hispanic immigrants, as a percentage of total population, are a drop in the bucket compared to our German/Italian/Irish immigrant population at the turn of the century.

3) Cultural assimilation is real even if Donald Duck says it isn't. Sorry. My high school was across the street from a mosque and most of the Muslim kids I know hated going there and were basically cellphone-glued Secular heathens like most of the American """Christians""" I know.

Why would that be the case? Spanish retention among Mexican Americans is very low, and Asian immigration is soon going to surpass Mexican immigration

He's fucking ignorant and scared.

I live in Florida, and I've been surrounded by English-speaking hispanics and Muslims all my life. Fully assimilated. My girlfriend's dad lives in lily-white New Hampshire and is shaking in his boots about Spanish immigrants that make up 4% of the total population at best.

It's Trumpian rhetoric coupled with bogus crime statistics perpetuated on /pol/

The equatorial regions won't have civilization as we know it today. Refugee issues plus global warming will mean much of that area is uninhabitable wasteland.

Sterilization will be mandatory, and sperm and eggs will be kept in catalogs so that reproduction is a process like adoption. Presumably gene therapy will be the standard to make superhuman intelligence by then.

Wars will be fought over dwindling resources, like water and rare earth metals. The "next frontier" won't be Mars but a functioning space elevator that would slowly allow us to access asteroids to address our commodity crisis.

The energy crisis will be solved through "green" technology, efficient usage, and changing habits. Urban areas will be the standard. 90% of people will live in cities or dense suburbs due to the cost of living rurally (water tables everywhere will be depleted). Goods will flow quite freely compared to today, but everyone will appear "poorer" (smaller houses, no cars, lower adjusted income, lower consumption per capita). A living wage will be in place, but there will be megacorporations that convey prestige and power to their employees. Governments will be politically powerless in the face of spacefaring companies or those that control vital resources (like water and mining companies).

The racial strife we have now will be basically a thing of the past, so long as each race stays in line and doesn't try to genocide the other. More brown-skinned people will come to white-skinned areas as refugees, but they won't be "taking jobs" as there are no low-skill jobs to take. The Western World will still be multicultural. The East will be destroyed by corruption, pollution, and environmental mismanagement - today's Russia is tomorrow's China. They will still seem "behind."

>Muslims in Florida

Where? Orlando? I know like three here in Miami

a new dark age

Earth will be drestoyed by aliens

>Reasonably, what will the world look like in 2200?

Either humanity would've destroyed itself by that point, or grown to unify under some form of global rule; not to say there still wouldn't be rebellious groups / cultures fighting for autonomy and/or independence.

When talking about global rule, I'm also not implying some new world order form of governance or anything inherintly malicious. We're already not entirely far off from the concept of global governance. Just look at the UN, EU or pacts such as NAFTA or TPP. Once you get past the myriad of acronyms and legal jargon, you start to realise that we're already heading towards global governance.

There will be only one state - global caliphate.

This sounds ripe for a global socialist revolution

The UK doesnt lose an inch but the US loses territory to shitty Mexico? Get the fuck outta here.

The world is divided between companies and there will be a lot of artificial islands where the rich live.

>or grown to unify under some form of global rule;
the empire, long divided, must unite; long united, must divide.

Unless aliens happen, i see no reason for a global gov.

The United Kingdom will have won its independence in the great Referendum of 2016, destroyed the European Union, executed commies, removed refugees, and made it back home in time for tea.

In 2200 the world map is red.
God save the Queen.

Texas is rightful mexican clay.

2nd gen kids genuinely fix themselves to anglo-american culture here in Texas. Meanwhile, I've worked with their parents. The work ethic is... different. It's a pragmatic one, but not in the Anglo-American sense of meeting a standard, moreso in just getting shit done. Nevertheless, they work hard.

The difference between a normal hispanic kid and a cholo hispanic kid is almost always going to be their socio-economic status, and there are plenty of them who make sacrifices to escape shitty cholo culture.

t. Austinite

I can only speak for my own city.

>Trumpian rhetoric
Trump is too smart for everybody including trumpkins.

"Hispanics" or "Spics" or "Mexicans" is codeword for niggers, arabs, gypsies and other human scum.

In Britain they tend to use "Eastern European", "Russian" or "Polish" in the same place and the meaning is the same as seen above.

Obviously political correctness and certain agenda makes it impossible to openly say no for the actual undesirables so they're building up their support base on peoples few liberals were taught to care about so they're using "proxy nationalities" to send the same message. As a result right wing gets ALL the working class votes while leftists run away from them calling what was once their core demographic "uneducated idiots".

It's a meme that's irreplaceable with anyone who fits the image of "those fucks my xenophobic demographic doesn't like" I always found it to be way less specific, and that vagueness is its strength because it can touch so many individual prejudices.

Everyone will be black.

>few thousands of mudslimes
>OOOOO UROPE IS DESTROYEDDDDDD RACW AR NENDKSKOAOAOSOS

Retard pol fags

Molon labe, Paco.

>few thousands
over 2 millions at the end of 2015.

And dumb because of this

Not history at all wtf.
GTFO with that speculative bs.

>few thousands
kek

Epic troll guys!

for teh lulz lmao

It is not like this muslims get more radical with each generation, and defend crazy stuff for our standards

9/11 took 19

Negros are dumb as fuck on average,so there is some truth behind the statement. If east asians/whites cease to exist humanity would collapse,as it was shown in Rhodesia. Negros dont know how to rule

> Negros dont know how to rule
Because whities always ruled over them so they got no chance to learn.

Do you think I'm dumb enough not to notice the source and the clearly photo-shopped title?

I tip my epic wins to thee. (I can tell because of the pixels, fellow maymay master)

>Because whities always ruled over them
And it worked.After white goverments collapsed they went to shit, like South Africa or Zimbabwue.

...

>History follows a simple cause and effect narrative according to my own personal(or borrowed) prejudice

Do you know how we can tell you're from /pol/? Because if you happen not to be, you'd fit right in buddy.

Los Estados Unidos de Mexico

>pol strawman
>Arguments given
>None

Well, imagine an early 19th century scholar imagining the world of early 21st. He would have hard time guessing concepts like nation states, socialism and industrialism, not to mention new technologies affecting everything.

He would be right predicting influential states battling over resources, powered by rich people oppressing the poor. That's because it's in our nature... so far.

See, tech and medicine developing at more and more higher rate eventually may lead into 1. AI and 2. Augmented Homo Sapiens. Both will lack the instincts fueling the human of today: greed and need of power. Rules, or at least suggestions, by these part will be considered beneficial into humankind.

War will become an outdated concept, or be cautiously hidden from general population.

>a cause-effect narrative is an argument in the first place
cute

Anyways I'm bored. Enjoy the smell of your own noxious farts.

>War will become an outdated concept, or be cautiously hidden from general population.

>Enjoy the smell of your own noxious farts.

>be cautiously hidden from general population.

There's plenty of wars no one gives a shit about or know only a bit. Just commit wars or support conflicts that hit that irrelvant zone and you'll be fine.

Hiding a war is hard as fuck m8. Especially on this era,when a person can inform about something with very little material things