Hey, Veeky Forums. Since we realized that there wasn't one yet, and its a form of education that's sorely lacking in modern day we're making a discord chatroom to be a general community of philosophy, and its general overlap with science, sociology, or other forms of theory. As well as to be a community in general.
We only just started up, but this is something that could be useful if if becomes big.
Chase Green
So Confucian role ethics are the right way?
Dylan Wood
No, ethics in the face of the Other is correct
Nicholas Walker
Why do edgy philosophers always try to come up with their own non standard form of ethics. It just makes everyone look retarded.
Nolan James
I don't understand. What makes something a standard form of ethics?
>It just makes everyone look retarded. What?
Angel Nguyen
If it complies with one of the three main theories in some coherent sense instead of being random gibberish said pretentiously.
David Edwards
The chat is literally gay.
Blake Price
Is that the point of philosophy? How exactly did philosophy as a discipline develop if it didn't comply to "main theories." Just because something is difficult doesn't make it gibberish. Why even study philosophy if you're going to go out of your way to only look at a few of the ideas that you think are important because someone told you they were? There's nothing wrong with disliking Levinas but appealing to "standard form of ethics" is retarded.
You should study the history of philosophy just a lil more. But only a lil. Hail Hydra and what not.
Adam Nelson
...That's not the issue. The issue isn't never making new ideas. Its the the main theories cover all the ground that can coherent exist. Everything should fall under one of those umbrellas.
Sebastian Morales
That makes no sense. If this doesn't fall under one of those that isn't true by definition.
James Cruz
The point is that it clearly DOES fall under one of those. But that pretentious assfucks ignore this when writing because they want to be unique.
Wyatt Ramirez
>making a discord for a board that is already slow as fuck No, fuck off. You're going to make this place fucking /trv/ tier.
Robert Johnson
what the fuck theres already a discord
Isaiah Phillips
are cheeseburgers normative ethics
I follow cheeseburgers anytime I see one.
Andrew Long
Why do you think every ethics should fall under the standard form? Finality? Completeness?
Jackson Nguyen
Because anything outside of them is more or less deliberately shirking a definition that probably applies to it just to be edgy.
Jacob Gonzalez
What are the three main forms then ?
Ryder Morales
Well what about reformulating the definition because the previous one couldn't answer the problem satisfactorily? Because that's what Levinas did. I'm surprised that you don't know Levinas, because he's pretty much - the - philosopher of ethics in the 20th century. He pretty much gave a new grounding for ethics, influenced by Heidegger. He's also the first philosopher that proclaims ethics as first philosophy, thereby subjugating metaphysics as a tool for ethics. Or, would you rather have "philosophers" committing the same mistake by thinking deontology in terms of what Kant did, i.e., phenomenon/noumenon distinction, etc.? I assume he means deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. But then again, if that's true, even before the standardization (which basically was made for pedagogic purposes), there were lots of other form of ethics. Sentimentalism, for example. I don't know why he's so obsessed with the three main forms, and then calling any attempts outside of themt retarded and pretentious. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Angel Morales
>Uses jargon with scoffingCunt.jpg
hate this condescending shit
Adam Cook
u mad?
Blake Phillips
Right, you stupid cunt. There's been a slack community for Veeky Forums + Veeky Forums since March, there was over an hundred people in it at one point. Fuck off with your /soc/ bullshit.
Jack Russell
I visited the Veeky Forums chat. It was pure ass.
Leo Smith
Basically not if it is about philosophy and deontology.