"Forced fellatio (i.e...

>"Forced fellatio (i.e. oral rape) is often called Egyptian rape or simply Egyptian; this goes back to the time of the Crusades when Mamluks were alleged to force their Christian captives to do this,"

I want to go back in time to see captured Crusaders being fucked in their mouths by their Muslim captors; fucked in the same mouths that shouted "Deus lo Vult!".

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrumatio
amazon.com/Cradle-Erotica-Afro-asian-Expression-Relationships/dp/1199715875
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

how does the victim not bite their dick off ?

Because they know the reprisal that will occur to them.

citation needed

Why would you want to see this op? Are you gay? Or do you just hate Christians? Or maybe you're just an edgey 16 year old?

So many questions.

Me personally? I think the act is deplorable and wouldn't want to bear witness to it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrumatio

>Why would you want to see this op?

Because it sounds pretty hot :3

That's a shitty ass fucking source. Wikipedia and the citation they use. i've read this article before years ago and I can tell that that citation is new and awful. Its more soft porn book than a book on historical facts. Fuck.

amazon.com/Cradle-Erotica-Afro-asian-Expression-Relationships/dp/1199715875

amazon.com/Cradle-Erotica-Afro-asian-Expression-Relationships/dp/1199715875

whats with gays and pedos editing wiki with their fantasy and nobody doing anything about it

>using image macros

Opinion discarded.

...

Yeah I've noticed this too. Some turbofag edited the History of Ireland article to suggest that Ireland wasn't Christian until the 14th century and that the Irish practiced Greek-style pederasty until the Great Famine, but since the Catholic Church gained power this fact has been swept under the rug.

The source was his blog.

On said blog, claimed to be a "metagender" person who worshipped Emperor Hadrian and his male lover, as well as the Egyptian and Celtic gods

What a tremendous edgelord you are.

because western infatuations with the BBC goes way back

sounds hot desu

>tfw no big smelly unwashed saracen cock to pound my virgin christian boypussy

>mamluks
>BBC

WE

Veeky Forums confirmed gay. The more you know

>unwashed

One of the few moments when circumcision makes things marginally better for you.

Saracens were more hygienic than most of Europe at the time. It would be a glorious, superior Saracen cock that you would not only enjoy but in fact beg for more.

Wikipedia has a policy against primary only sources.
Every article must quote some academic works and research, but also some news articles and blogposts.
If the Wikipedia page only cites primary sources, it will get flagged.

Why are Muslims such goddamned homos?

It's not gay because there's no love brah

Replace his with Veeky Forums

>>"Forced fellatio (i.e. oral rape) is often called Egyptian rape or simply Egyptian; this goes back to the time of the Crusades when Mamluks were alleged to force their Christian captives to do this,"

>Forced fellatio (i.e. oral rape) is often called Egyptian rape or simply Egyptian; this goes back to the time of the Crusades when Mamluks were alleged to force their Christian captives to do this.[12][page needed]

>[12][page needed]

>[12] Edwardes, Allen; Masters, Robert E. L. The cradle of erotica, New York: Julian Press, 1963.

>PAGE NEEDED

PAGE NEEDED

PAGE NEEDED

The fake bullshit some Wikifag made up by footnoting some source without a page number because it doesn't exist is FAKE AS SHIT.

If it wasn't fake there would be a page number from the book cited where you could find the actual quote.

BUT IT AIN'T THERE

PAGE NEEDED

OP DISREGARDED

>you will never be a child crusader captured by a rich, pitying sandape
>you will never forced to wear emberessing clothing
>you will never be spanked a lot for not reading the quran
>you will never become one of his maids and help him whatchover his 18 kids

Most of the kids were probably abused and died doing harsh labor...

It was a very nice try OP.

Next time you try rewrite history with your own personal left-wing agenda you should double-check your sources.

Now go wack off to gay porn.

more gay porn for the OP

fap fap fap

Fag OP exposed as deranged homosexual fetishist who wants to import rapefugees to make his erotic dreams come true.

PAY YOUR OWN PLANE TICKET TO EGYPT FAGGOT!

>Mamluks
>black
Lol fuck off, Arab sources even describe blond Mamluks

Muslims can't be white by default

triggered

WE

Reminder that 'mamluk' literally means 'owned' because they were slaves originally from Europe.

>europe

They were turkic

Upon further inspection, there were Turkic, Caucasian, and Copts. I thought that they were mostly Caucasian.

This doesn't sound true at all. THEY WOULD BITE YOUR DICK OFF!

There are blond people in the caucassus and central asia.

>asking for a source is being triggered
wew

Only the knights would, but they would much more likely just fight to the death instead of surrendering. Most crusaders also would fight to the death, just for their freedom.

Many fighters were just opportunistic looters though, especially the younger boys, who might consider surrendering for some water and slave work

Buy the book and see for yourself :^)

>muslim
>engaging in homofaggotry

hah nice try Christfag but we rekt you back then just like we are murdering you in your own countries right now ;)

>knights
>fighting to the death

yeah you're retarded they were yelding all the time as they were worth more alive than dead so the enemy could get a nice ransom

>alleged
>alleged
>alleged
>alleged
>alleged

>Only the knights would, but they would much more likely just fight to the death instead of surrendering

You've been watching too many movies. Most knights would surrender and ransom themselves rather than let themselves get killed.

>WE
>Mamluks occcupying levantine coast
>What are blonde levantines?

Its not wewuzing this time.

didnt muslims chop dicks off their slaves?

Yeah in Europe. But fighting savages in the middle of nowhere?

The savages were the european back then desu

>Muslims
>savages
Christians were the invading savages during the Crusades desu. Also who doesn't like money?

No. That only pertained to a certain class of slaves.

Depends on which slaves. I don't think they did it to a lot of mamluks considering they had their own dynasties.

>you will never be a Crusader captured in battle and forced to become the sex slave and toy of a manly and virile Mamluk
>said Mamluk master will never display you in front of his court as an exotic pet from faraway Europe, and proceed fuck you in front of his attendants and functionaries while you begin to realize you enjoy it.

t. ahmed

[spoiler]B-But my name is Jeff.[/spoiler]

I always fantasize about the childrens crusades turning into a bacha bazi harem where they are forced to kiss eachother and stuff.

He's an animefag

I think this thread needs a bump

I think op did a good job triggering both sides with this thread