Why are right wing dictators so much more reviled than left wing ones despite objectively being much better?

t. commies

redpill me on "t."
I understand it's usage but where does it come from?

I'ts the Finnish contraction for "from, signed, sincerely," it comes from /int/ and its enormous Finnish population.

"terveiset" is finnish for regards

danke

>Also the economy under him was more controlled than under the previous socialist government.
You are dumb of trolling.Pinochet reprivatizedmost of what Allende expropiated except the copper industry.

>Why are right wing dictators so much more reviled than left wing ones

What the fuck are you talking about ? Commie dictators are as hated as fascist dictators.

I think it may sorta kinda have something to do with this Hitler guy giving it a bad name

The most hated dictators in history are Hitler, Stalin, and Mao, that's two leftists and a radical centrist.

>radical centrist
niceme.me

>you will never throw Lenin out of a helicopter

>ywn force churchburner anarchists and communists to build the Valle de los Caidos

>Fascism
>Right wing

The U.S. is a leftist nation, Sided with Leftists in WWII. The world you live in is a product of that conflict, and years of indoctrination, and cultural decline have taught you authority and structure are evil.

>Pincochet
>More reviled
If anything, the consequence of his regime has been largely hidden by the shill American Press.

>U.S. is a leftist nation
>Majority religious population
>Obama is a conservative by European standards
>Sided with Leftists in WWII???
>Colonial Churchill a leftist????
>Colonial DeGaulle a leftist?????
>In God We Trust on currency
>Abortion steadily becoming more illegal
>Private schools
>Charter schools
>Religious schools
>Phoney Baloney Fiat currency
>Warmongering media that constantly trumpets for more foreign wars of aggression
Oh yeah, this country is totally """leftist."""

>The U.S. is a leftist nation
Fuck off idiot.

you fool. The U.S. intervention to back Russia against Germany and China against Japan caused and irreversible catastrophe in cultural leftism.

Germany, Italy, Spain and Japan were conservative nations, upholding the values of Conservatism and were defeated by a coalition of Leftist nations under the guise of communism and capitalism, that plunged the world into liberal degradation that is in its final form now.

China persists with a WWII style economy to this day, producing a ceaseless supply of consumer product, and inudstrial goods, at national scale. This must be poured out somewhere, and capitalist nations are the PERFECT counterbalance to a communist producer. We will buy ( in preposterous quantities, with fiat money) all that communist nation under national direction produces.

Communism and capitalism NEED eachother.

Fascism , national-socialsim, and conservative-ism need NO ONE. They look inside their borders, inside their own people for all they need. Conservative nations subsist of the blood and soil of their own people.

Communism and capitalism fuel their machines with the blood of their people. Where communism grinds them up, and capitalism devalues them into puppet -robot consumers, who clamor for whatever their programming has told them to want.

both communism and capitalism REQUIRE victims, where as conservativeism and national-socialism empower and REQUIRE the individual to be an active part of the whole.

>Fascism , national-socialsim, and conservative-ism need NO ONE. They look inside their borders, inside their own people for all they need
Oh yeah, because the Nazi's totally didn't take over Europe or anything like that, nope not at all.

you common core, millennial dipshits have not one IOTA of comprehension of neither the world nor reading. Your only freedom is to bleet the words of your masters like sheep.

the graveness of your error is lost on you. Go back to mapping the interior of buildings and homes on your pokemon. when "they" come to find you, at least they know where to look now.

Is this what schizophrenia looks like?

Looks like Common Core did a number on your grammar and spelling as well.

again, you stupid fool. Nazi Germany expanded into the historical borders of the German nation, and sought ONLY and SOLELY to return all Germanic blooded people to the rightful posession of Germany.

At no point what so ever was capitalist style colonialism desired by the Germans. In fact it was opposed by doctrine. there is NO NEED to exploit colored degenerates for anything, when your own nation produces all you need and more from your own ethnic lands.
Oil from the balkans,
Food from Ukraine,
water from scandinavia
and control of the suez canal and various port water ways to ensure the travel of national goods.

Just a typical troll trying to massage out cumulative annoyance with this concept. As if it's not a dimebin opinion.

>China today
>Communist

>Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, etc.
>Not capitalistic

What do you call capitalism and communism exactly?

/pol/ and /leftypol/ because he clearly doesn't interact with the world outside of a few cesspools on the internet.

>objectively better

Such shitty bait.

Pinochet isn't right-wing. He's a radical liberal, for Christ's sake. Any dictator working within a democratic or nationalist framework can never be right-wing -- no matter how hard they dress up their liberal state with traditionalist elements.

Right-wing dictators are rarely reviled. Look at how Alexander the Great, Charlemagne, and Julius Caeser are still celebrated today.

>. Any dictator working within a democratic or nationalist framework can never be right-wing -
nice special snowflake definitions you got there/

>Pinochet
>good

You fell for the meme.

Nations are a meme, my dude

Why rest your entire identity on borders formed out of historical circumstance?

Borders are a meme, but nations aren't

The land between those borders made me. I AM this land, and this land IS me. My blood comes from this land, and will return to it. There is no distinction between me and this space I walk on.

...

The concept of a nation state is merely an evolution of tribes. It's really simple; people who have your language as a mother tongue are a part of your nation, therefore areas where your mother tongue is the majority are a part of your nation.

Because the alternative is being a rootless individual who is only considered a consumer by multinational companies, rather then a citizen of a nation with a history going back centuries. To be blunt, there is more to life then money and pleasure, and while there is nothing wrong with those things in and of themselves, one should never forget that the nation state is our only defense against the religious/feudal barbarism of the past and the corporate barbarism of the present and the future.

But nationalism often challenges and ignores current borders. It has nothing or little to do with them.

Commies are almost always those who get bullied. The anarchist or communist kid is never alpha, it's always some Auschwitzmode faggot with glasses and no chin.

Why are right wing dictators so praised? The economic inequality in Pinochets time is just awful and people like him cause memes basically

Because we don't think inequality is a bad thing, bitch nigga.

Why did they invade yugoslavia if it's historical borders. Why Greece. Why Russia? Read the sticky, no uneducated pol children

You wouldn't think so if you lived in such a society and were born on the wrong side

>Yugoslavia
>historical

It literally existed for 20 years at that time

Inequality is natural and inevitable, trying to eliminate it is a fruitless effort.

The bad thing is poverty, NEVER inequality, beaner scum.

But that's false, look at the French nation -- disparate peoples united by propaganda campaigns into a "nation", so as to legitimize imperial rule from Paris

Italy is still a rough patchwork of cultures. Russia, China, and India even more-so.

Well yeah, but that's why interregional conflicts come to exist

Because Allende fucked their shit up even more

But poverty was exactly the problem under Pinochets rule? Do you know what you're talking about or are we spouting memes

Except there's like good 1000 years between the end of tribalism and the emergence of nationalism.

Yugoslavia was their ally until a coup happened and a pro allies government was installed, so they had to get rid of the blade at their back.
Greece had british naval bases.
Russia was preparing for an attack as well, but it would have come later.
Not even a naziboo but that's their perspective

Communism is a meme my fedora friend.

you are a meme

Then why do you bitch about inukvality when you just wanted to say poverty? Sub 100 IQ retard.

Tell that to communists

Or even so called liberals and their fixation on the assassination of Trump, and I say this as someone that thinks Trump is a hack.
The fact is most people dislike being contradicted or disagreed with, and it can generate massive amounts of hate and violence.

Extreme inequality is related to poverty, no need to resort to name calling really, your board is /pol/

t. /pol/ who got btfo by us commies

How's the soviet union doing these days?

And before that, it wasn't historically German, or even Germanic.

I wouldn't say that right-wing dictators are "more reviled" than Leftist dictators. Pinochet got to go back to Chile and had his funeral there, the Minister of Defense attended.

Also
>objectively being much better
lmfao

but its true in the sense that his word was law, nobody could say no to his reforms

I'm going to go do drugs with my commie friends and have sex with my gender fluid friend(both of us have dicks) while we talk about how religion is shit and white people ruined the world
You like that /pol/ shitheads?

>I just wanted to execute all the rich, kulaks, people who disagree with me, military officers, and stem fags, looks like you got a lot of growing up to do kid.

not as much as I like your future

Fuck off fascists shits you'll lose to us like you did last time

He is right. Pinochet removed commie but he crashed the economy with no survivors. Chile is only doing so well because of Pinochet's successors.

spunk.org/texts/otherpol/critique/sp001280.html

It's mohammed or hitler
history has been set in motion

Mohamed is less dangerous

True, people with no means of defending themselves will often develop a general mistrust for authority, as it tends to take advantage of them whenever it can.

Far be it from me to stop you engaging in unfulfilling degeneracy and blowing your cash on temporal and worldly stuff that won't eve fill the holes in your soul

You do realize that if Mohammed gets in power you'll be first on the chopping block alongside the faggots and the feminists right?

Likewise with Hitler.

There's only one way to win.

That reminds me of a joke I read on /pol/ a few days ago
>The resignation of one shadow minister is a tragedy
>The resignation of one shadow cabinet is a statistic

Leftism is dead

Yes inshallah we shall hang faggots from the eiffel tower

They throw them off buildings, they don't hang them

Iran can afford the cranes

Same with Hitler.

Naziism and Wahhabism are both fascist ideologies that need to be crushed.

>selectively not including most of the 80s in an attempt to paint the free market as a failure

Great source, friendo.

Also, Chile is the most economically successful nation in South America today and at the same time is the most free market.

...

>Implying Fascism and NatSoc aren't leftist ideologies
I thought Hayek dispelled this meme ages ago

don't even start this.

I've never understood horseshoe theory, is for real or a meme? The Libertarian/Authoritarian and Individualist/Collectivist axes make the most sense to me desu

Where does Fascism sit?

Sometimes I like to think of that chart as a cone that tapers down to a point at the bottom, and that point is anarchy. As much as there's anarcho-memes there's no actual way to enforce anything. So the horseshoe theory tries to explain that being extreme left or extreme right means you need extreme authoritarian control.

Chile will never venezula tier, I hope pinochet rapes you commies in hell

Authoritarian left. Limited personal freedoms put it in positive y and nationalized and heavily regulated industries put it in negative x.

Straddling the line between the blue and the red

Fascism can sit in either economical sphere, depending on who holds the power. I agree with

>regulation means left wing
No regulation mean more authoritarian, meaning more Y. If you have a codified system where only nobles born of noble blood can be land holders, that's regulation. That doesn't mean a system of aristocracy is left.

>calling out anti-communist's behavior means you support communist's behavior
Nigga plz