Hitler Thread

>Veeky Forums unironically hates Adolf Hitler
How does it feel being stupid morons?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/CommunismInGermany
archive.org/details/BewaffnetterAufstand
archive.org/details/MeinKampf_472
archive.org/details/Hitler-Adolf-Mein-Kampf
archive.org/details/GottfriedFeder_TheProgramOfTheNSDAP
archive.org/details/Feder-Gottfried-Das-Programm-der-NSDAP
archive.org/details/GottfriedFederManifestoForTheAbolitionOfInterestSlavery1919
archive.org/details/GottfriedFederTheGermanStateOnANationalAndSocialistFoundation
archive.org/details/TheTriumphOfReason-TheThinkingMansAdolfHitler
archive.org/details/ArthurBryantUnfinishedVictory1940V1
archive.org/details/WilliamJoyceTwilightOverEngland
archive.org/details/JewishDominationOfWeimarGermany1919-1932
archive.org/details/TheCaseForGermany
archive.org/details/OurFinacialMasters
archive.org/details/InsanityFair_1
archive.org/details/NationalSocialismTheBiologicalWorldview
archive.org/details/NationalSocialismVanguardOfTheFutureSelectedWritingsOfColinJordan
archive.org/details/HitlerZweitesBuchENGLISH
archive.org/details/19320715Hitlerappealtothenationae
archive.org/details/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253
research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb58.htm
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/Goebbels091038.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

try and be a little more creative next time

go back to pol

My post is both bait and my actual thoughts. I get why you guys aren't like /pol/ and suck his dick 24/7, but you guys refuse to even acknowledge the fact that Adolf Hitler took what was essentially a 3rd World nation and turned it into one of the top 5 most powerful nations on the planet.

>essentially a 3rd World nation and turned it into one of the top 5 most powerful nations on the planet.
No, Germany already had the industrial capabilities of first world country. There were just unused capabilities.

THE AVERAGE /pol/ USER KNOWS VIRTUALLY NOTHING REGARDING ADOLF HITLER, AND/OR NATIONAL SOCIALISM; THE AVERAGE /pol/ USER DOES NOT LIKE ADOLF HITLER, BECAUSE IT IGNORE HIM; IT IS NOT NATIONAL SOCIALIST, BUT NAZI.

That's like saying that Mexico could become a 1st World nation overnight if they wanted to.
The biggest thing holding Germany back was their fucked up economy, which Hitler fixed by telling the Jews (bankers) to fuck off.

>"... BECAUSE IT [IGNORES] HIM..."

THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST ECONOMIC RECOVERY CONSISTED IN RADICAL REFORM, NOT JUST IN DEPOSING JEWISH BANKERS.

>muh economy

So you are telling me that all that hitler did was stabilize the economy? That doesn't sound to me like the kind of thing a 3rd world country would need to achieve 1st world status.

Would you mind posting a few other things Hitler did to fix Germany? I'm feeling really lazy tonight.

No, but this is one of the few things that EVERYONE (leftists included) can say was a good thing.

Tell me then. How did hitler transformed a country that was on par with bolivia to an economic powerhouse that made europe it's bitch in just 6 years?

>That's like saying that Mexico could become a 1st World nation overnight if they wanted to.
No, it's like saying Japan could become a 1st world nation overnight if they wanted to.

>which Hitler fixed
"Broke it, or made it BETTER?"
"No, you broke it!"

Muh economy always preceeds "who cares about the economy anyway?"

He didn't stabilize the economy though. He jsut pulled a Greece and took massive denbts.

Except that even the economic stability was a lie. They had too loot the treasuries of all their neighbors just to fund their on-paper-only """"recovery"""". Without those injections of new reserves, they would have been toast by 1941 at the latest.

Everyone hates Hitler. He was a monster to most and a retard who screwed up to the others.

He did have his oratory skills though, no one can take that away from you Hitler.

...

...

>Hitler was evil
Check this out, libtards.

>a person, a group, an idea, or an object that "for better or for worse...has done the most to influence the events of the year".[2]

>for better or worse
Hmm, I wonder which it is
>pic related

>TIME man of the year
Woah, fucking compelling stuff there.

Now I'm a #NaziMissile

...

— REMOVING JEWS FROM POSITIONS OF POWER IN POLITICS, MEDIA, FINANCE, ETCETERA.

— NATIONALIZING ALL POLITICAL, FINANCIAL, AND CIVIC, INSTITUTIONS.

— SOCIALIZING PRODUCTION.

— PRIVATIZING DISTRIBUTION, AND MANUFACTURE.

— ISSUING LABOURBASED BONDS AS CURRENCY.

— IMPLEMENTING NATIONWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE, AND SERVICES, PROJECTS.

— MAXIMIZING FARMING CAPACITY, AND OPTIMIZING AGRICULTURAL LOGISTICS OF PRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION.


WHETHER "THE RECOVERY" ENTAILED BORROWING, OR NOT, IS IRRELEVANT; THE RELEVANT FACTOR IS NOT HOW THE INITIAL CAPITAL REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN WAS OBTAINED, BUT HOW IT WAS UTILIZED.

>3rd world nation
This is a joke right? Is this /pol/'s grasp on history? They were wounded and beaten 1st world country that was one of most powerful nations on the planet before WWI. It was in no way a 3rd world country. At best, you can argue that reckless unsustainable stimulus spending and diplomatic gambles got Germany back up on it's feet.

>but you guys refuse to even acknowledge the fact that Adolf Hitler
If he died after annexing Austria, but before invading Poland, he'd be remembered as a great man, and his antisemitism would merely be a sidenote of history. But he didn't stop at Austria, he went full retard.

Check out the cover /pol/tard

"Hitler became in 1938 the greatest threatening force that the democratic, freedom-loving world faces today."

Yes, look at how prosperous Germany looked when Hitler's reign ended.

You'll grow out of this user
I feel like you're a schoolboy who his whole life has only learnt about the evil Hitler perpetrated, then when you learn that the German economy improved you feel the need to tell people as if it's not a widely acknowledged fact already
He's responsible for the deaths of millions of people and the economic ruin that awaited Germany for years after the war

>, BUT HOW IT WAS UTILIZED.
It was utilized on losing a world war.

Koz, you're a National Socialist?

Is that why it half of Europe became Communist ni 1945?

>Adolf Ehrt - Communism in Germany
archive.org/details/CommunismInGermany
>Adolf Ehrt - Bewaffnetter Aufstand!
archive.org/details/BewaffnetterAufstand

>Adolf Hitler - Mein kampf (English)
archive.org/details/MeinKampf_472
>Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf (Deutsch)
archive.org/details/Hitler-Adolf-Mein-Kampf

>Gottfried Feder - The Program Of The NSDAP The National Socialist Workers' Party And Its General Conceptions
archive.org/details/GottfriedFeder_TheProgramOfTheNSDAP
>Gottfried Feder - Das Programm der NSDAP (Deutsch)
archive.org/details/Feder-Gottfried-Das-Programm-der-NSDAP
>Gottfried Feder - Manifesto For The Abolition Of Interest Slavery
archive.org/details/GottfriedFederManifestoForTheAbolitionOfInterestSlavery1919
>Gottfried Feder The German State On A National And Socialist Foundation
archive.org/details/GottfriedFederTheGermanStateOnANationalAndSocialistFoundation

What country are you from?

Yes.

The communist world is the democratic, freedom-loving world.

>all of these left wing leaning parasites in this thread
Kek, you guys amuse me. Please, tell me more about how '''evil''' Adolf was.

>The Triumph of Reason - The Thinking Man's Adolf Hitler by Michael Walsh
archive.org/details/TheTriumphOfReason-TheThinkingMansAdolfHitler

>Arthur Bryant - Unfinished Victory (1940)
>Prominent British historian writes a fairly objective prehistory of WWII
archive.org/details/ArthurBryantUnfinishedVictory1940V1

>William Joyce – Twilight Over England
>Twilight Over England compared the evils of Jewish-dominated capitalist Britain with the successes of National Socialist Germany.
archive.org/details/WilliamJoyceTwilightOverEngland
I REALLY RECOMMEND THIS BOOK, HIGHLIGHTS THE WHY OF THE ANGER TOWARDS THE JEWS.
>Jewish Domination Of Weimar Germany 1919-1932, Eckart-Verlag
archive.org/details/JewishDominationOfWeimarGermany1919-1932

>The Case for Germany: A Study of Modern Germany by Arthur Pillans Laurie
>a view of National-Socialist Germany by a Scottish scholar inside Hitler's Third Reich.
archive.org/details/TheCaseForGermany

United States friend.

He would infringe on my right to have a good time therefore he is evil.

Do you not what left wing means? I think you're confusing it with liberal.

>Our Finacial Masters by A. Raven Thompson
archive.org/details/OurFinacialMasters

>Insanity Fair by Reed, Douglass
>A pro-fascist view of the anchluss between Germany and Austria
archive.org/details/InsanityFair_1

>National Socialism: The biological Worldview, PH Riis-Knudsen
archive.org/details/NationalSocialismTheBiologicalWorldview

>National Socialism Vanguard Of The Future by Colin Jordan
archive.org/details/NationalSocialismVanguardOfTheFutureSelectedWritingsOfColinJordan

>Hitler Zweites Buch ENGLISH
archive.org/details/HitlerZweitesBuchENGLISH

>Hitler - Appeal to the Nation
archive.org/details/19320715Hitlerappealtothenationae

>Man & Technics - A Contribution to a Philosophy of Life by Oswald Spengler
archive.org/details/ManTechnics-AContributionToAPhilosophyOfLife193253

>Joseph Goebbels - Communism with the mask off.
research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb58.htm
>Joseph Goebbels - On the natural alliance between Democracy and Communism
jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/Goebbels091038.html

>mfw this thread is full of liberal shills

>If you don't like my retarded 1920s ideology that failed miserably you're a communist

If it helps you sleep at night.

What part of Eastern Europe was democratic in 1944?

Hitler took a shit all over Europe, and then was surprised when living in shit brought pests.

It's not like this is a hidden fact, it's just not in the 2 paragraph summaries of what you need to know about famous people in textbooks.

It's the way he was able to rise to power and accomplish his "evil" deeds. Every book on Hitler says this because it's obvious.

The school has determined it's more important that you know he's the evil guy in WWII than it is to know he made Germany great again, was a vegetarian, anti-smoking, raped his niece, and had a micropenis.

I had the audacity to call my high-school history teacher out on his bullshit when he said that the nazis made soap out of fat from jewish bodies. Needless to say, I got kicked out and sent to the principal's office.

If he would have been born at any other time in history he would have been nothing, and forgotten.

Hitler didn't shit in Europe, the Allies did when they removed him.

And it would have happened if Hitler, Codreanu, Mussolini, Horthy, and the other leaders hadn't risen up. The Bolsheviks had been sending "intellectuals" into various Eastern and Western European nations for some time in an attempt to undermine those nations and to steer them toward Boshevism.

Practically worked in Germany in 1917, which makes this postsomewhat ironic.

He did the equivalent of taking out 5 credit cards, and max them out, and when the bills were due, he would go into another country and take their gold to pay for them and repeat

The funny thing is this story is it's probably completely made up unlike jewsoaps.

>In 2006 a sample of the soap archived at the International Court of Justice in The Hague was given for analysis to Andrzej Stołyhwo, an expert in the chemistry of fats from the Gdansk University of Technology in Poland. He concluded that some of the fat in the sample tested was of human origin
>evidence does exist of small-scale soap production, possibly experimental, in the camp at Stutthof concentration camp near Danzig/Gdansk

>Hitler didn't shit in Europe, the Allies did when they removed him.
OK, so how much of Europe in 1944 was democratic. How much of it had even a notionally sovereign government anymore?

>And it would have happened if Hitler, Codreanu, Mussolini, Horthy, and the other leaders hadn't risen up
Remember how NATO managed to not lose a single nation to communism for 40 fucking years, and Hitler managed to give half of Europe to Stalin in 12.

Remember how it was Hitler, and not that allies, that actually INVITED the Soviet Union to invade Eastern Europe with his blessing.

Do you have a pic of this doc? I have a feeling that he's got a bigger nose than Pinocchio.

>Hitler was a gud boi who dindu nuffin

Poland, Czechoslovakia.

>Mussolini

Was a socialist before he dropped the movement to grab power.

>Codreanu

Reactionary and animal that murdered Nicolae Iorga, one of the most prominent figures in Romanian historiography and the Romanian intelligentsia. Copycat nazis. I like their exaltation of the Romanian peasant but that's about it. Their promotion of the church is also hateworthy.

This is what you're resorting to.
You silly edgelord.

NO.

THE DEBTS INCURRED FROM BORROWING FOR THE REQUIRED CAPITAL FOR IMPLEMENTING THE ECONOMIC PLAN WERE TO BE PAYED ONCE THE ECONOMY WAS RECONSTITUTED, WHICH WAS THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY HAD TO BORROW IN THE FIRST PLACE.

IT IS NOT DIFFICULT TO APPREHEND THE NOTION OF HOW THIS PLAN FUNCTIONED UNLESS THAT YOU ARE MENTALLY IMPAIRED.

You're fedora sensibilities betray you.
Great logic, Hitler GAVE half of Europe, and totally not because he was having to deal with being backstabbed by the Americans.
Even if you are willing to ignore that fact, that Hitler had tried to create an anti-Comintern pact with Pilduski or that Hitler had allied with numerous European nations, even then you have to acknowledge that the US and GB gave half of Europe to the Communists instead of following Patton's recommendation to push them back.

There's evidence for small scale jewsoap production. The part that's a myth is that it was a large scale industry, but there's a good reason that myth exists, the rumor was intentionally spread by Germans.

Because living in a theocratic shithole is so pleasant, just ask the average Saudi citizen.

one theocratic nation =/=every other, oh you filthy communist.

Likewise atheism wasn't illegal in National Socialist Germany, nor was Islam- actually what is funny is the LDS Church and Mormonism was.

>Great logic, Hitler GAVE half of Europe, and totally not because he was having to deal with being backstabbed by the Americans.
>Declare war on a country for no raisin.
>They actually fight back
>OMG how unfair!

Fix your keyboard buddy.

You speak of hypothetical economic plans all you wish, but the fact of the matter is that the German economy was geared towards one major thing: Waging War

What about Judaism?

>No reason
How about retaining a major German city and large swathes of German territory, then turning your head when violent acts were committed against those German populations?

>How about retaining a major German city and large swathes of German territory
OK, I'll bite. Which Major German City, and which large swathes of German territory did the U.S. occupy in 1941. I'll wait.

one theocratic nation =/=every other, oh you filthy communist.

They all function the same, essentially.

And ask Jehova's Witness' how they were persecuted.

It wasn't ethnically indigenous to Germany and it's ethnic group were a threat to the nation. What do you care atheist?

>tripfaggot
kys

>ethnically indigenous to Germany

Neither was Christianity.

We're talking Poland? Oh and the US had done everything short of a declaration of war on Germany prior to Hitler's announcement. Here, an except of his speech.

>In July 1940 Roosevelt began to take many new measures toward war, such as permitting the service of American citizens in the British air force and the training of British air force personnel in the United States. In August 1940 a joint military policy for the United States and Canada was established. In order to make the establishment of a joint American-Canadian defense committee plausible to at least the stupidest people, Roosevelt periodically invented crises and acted as if America was threatened by immediate attack. He would suddenly cancel trips and quickly return to Washington and do similar things in order to emphasize the seriousness of the situation to his followers, who really deserve pity.

>He moved still closer to war in September 1940 when he transferred fifty American naval destroyers to the British fleet, and in return took control of military bases on British possessions in North and Central America. Future generations will determine the extent to which, along with all this hatred against socialist Germany, the desire to easily and safely take control of the British empire in its hour of disintegration may have also played a role.

>After Britain was no longer able to pay cash for American deliveries he imposed the Lend-Lease Act on the American people [in March 1941]. As President, he thereby obtained the authority to furnish lend-lease military aid to countries that he, Roosevelt, decided it was in America’s vital interests to defend. After it became clear that Germany would not respond under any circumstances to his continued boorish behavior, this man took another step forward in March 1941.

>As early as December 19, 1939, an American cruiser [the Tuscaloosa ] that was inside the security zone maneuvered the [German] passenger liner Columbus into the hands of British warships. As a result, it had to be scuttled. On that same day, US military forces helped in an effort to capture the German merchant ship Arauca. On January 27, 1940, and once again contrary to international law, the US cruiser Trenton reported the movements of the German merchant ships Arauca, La Plata and Wangoni to enemy naval forces.

>On June 27, 1940, he announced a limitation on the free movement of foreign merchant ships in US ports, completely contrary to international law. In November 1940 he permitted US warships to pursue the German merchant ships Phrygia, Idarwald and Rhein until they finally had to scuttle themselves to keep from falling into enemy hands. On April 13, 1941, American ships were permitted to pass freely through the Red Sea in order to supply British armies in the Middle East.

>In the meantime, in March [1941] all German ships were confiscated by the American authorities. In the process, German Reich citizens were treated in the most degrading way, ordered to certain locations in violation of international law, put under travel restrictions, and so forth. Two German officers who had escaped from Canadian captivity [to the United States ] were shackled and returned to the Canadian authorities, likewise completely contrary to international law.

>countries sovereignty guaranteed

>lol why they declare war on us?

Over 1,500 years and a personal denomination born in Germany

>And by a man who wrote "On the Jews and Their Lies" no less

>On March 27 [1941] the same president who is [supposedly] against all aggression announced support for [General Dusan] Simovic and his clique of usurpers [in Yugoslavia], who had come to power in Belgrade after the overthrow of the legal government. Several months earlier, President Roosevelt had sent [OSS chief] Colonel Donovan, a very inferior character, to the Balkans with orders to help organize an uprising against Germany and Italy in Sofia [Bulgaria] and Belgrade. In April he [Roosevelt] promised lend-lease aid to Yugoslavia and Greece. At the end of April he recognized Yugoslav and Greek emigrants as governments in exile. And once again, in violation of international law, he froze Yugoslav and Greek assets.

>Starting in mid-April [1941] US naval patrols began expanded operations in the western Atlantic, reporting their observations to the British. On April 26, Roosevelt delivered twenty high speed patrol boats to Britain. At the same time, British naval ships were routinely being repaired in US ports. On May 12, Norwegian ships operating for Britain were armed and repaired [in the USA ], contrary to international law. On June 4, American troop transports arrived in Greenland to build air fields. And on June 9 came the first British report that a US war ship, acting on orders of President Roosevelt, had attacked a German submarine near Greenland with depth charges.

>On June 14, German assets in the United States were frozen, again in violation of international law. On June 17, on the basis of a lying pretext, President Roosevelt demanded the recall of the German consuls and the closing of the German consulates. He also demanded the shutting down of the German “Transocean” press agency, the German Library of Information [in New York] and the German Reichsbahn [national railway] office.

And Jews had been living in the German states since the Middle Ages.

>We're talking Poland?
No, you said he declared war on AMERICA for occupying large swathes of German territory.

> Oh and the US had done everything short of a declaration of war on Germany prior to Hitler's announcement.
Can't have it both ways. Was he backstabbed by the Americans, or did he invite Stalin to take the better part of Europe after starting an unwinnable war against the United States.

>On July 6 and 7 [1941], American armed forces acting on orders from Roosevelt occupied Iceland, which was in the area of German military operations. He hoped that this action would certainly, first, finally force Germany into war [against the USA] and, second, also neutralize the effectiveness of the German submarines, much as in 1915-1916. At the same time, he promised military aid to the Soviet Union. On July 10 Navy Secretary [Frank] Knox suddenly announced that the US Navy was under orders to fire against Axis warships. On September 4 the US destroyer Greer, acting on his orders, operated together with British airplanes against German submarines in the Atlantic. Five days later, a German submarine identified US destroyers as escort vessels with a British convoy.

>In a speech delivered on September 11 [1941], Roosevelt at last personally confirmed that he had given the order to fire against all Axis ships, and he repeated the order. On September 29, US patrols attacked a German submarine east of Greenland with depth charges. On October 17 the US destroyer Kearny, operating as an escort for the British, attacked a German submarine with depth charges, and on November 6 US armed forces seized the German ship Odenwald in violation of international law, took it to an American port, and imprisoned its crew.

>I will overlook as meaningless the insulting attacks and rude statements by this so-called President against me personally. That he calls me a gangster is particularly meaningless, since this term did not originate in Europe, where such characters are uncommon, but in America. And aside from that, I simply cannot feel insulted by Mr. Roosevelt because I regard him, like his predecessor Woodrow Wilson, as mentally unsound [geisteskrank].

Hitler did what Roosevelt was too much a coward to do.

I hate Hitler for his disregard of his German officers like Manstein, Von Bock, Kesselring, and Guderian

Had he listened to any of them the war would have been won and Germany would have won

As foreigners. BUT had you learned the census figures the Jewish population grew multiple times over during the Weimar Republic mostly due to "economic opportunity".

>Hitler did what Roosevelt was too much a coward to do.
Destroy Europe, and Germany.

And now, in the course of the same ranting, Hitler is great and the Americans are crap BECAUSE America wouldn't go to war against Germany.

I was talking about Poland.

He declared war on America because America had pretty much done everything short of declaring war on him, see the greentext speech itt.

Why would America go to war against Germany. Germany had no opposing political or economic interests nor was it a threat to America.

>as foreigners

Who'd been living in Germany for generations, defacto making them natives.

Then why the state of Israel?

Because right wing reactionary Jews, spooked by their own ethnicity (just like Stormfags, btw) think they're special and that everyone else is shit (as do pretty much all religions).

>
Why would America go to war against Germany. Germany had no opposing political or economic interests nor was it a threat to America.
And back again. Gee, I dunno. Maybe that was why they didn't, and it took a monumental retard like Hitler to cause a war between the U.S. and Germany, especially after Germany was already losing a war to the Soviets.

Once again those Commie roots are showing.

Germany was only losing the war to the Soviets because of America.
>AFTER Germany was already losing a war to the Soviets

>Battle of Stalingrad ended February 2nd, 1943
>Hitler declares war on the US December 11th, 1941

Goodnight user. Keep studying.

And? How are Stormfags any different than any other ethnic chauvinist?

Yeah but America hadn't been able to mobilize a big enough effort to contribute to the European front till late 1942 and 1943. Plus the lend lease act was the core reason why they were able to mount an assault against Germany in Stalingrad, which was quickly halted with Kharkov. Either way the user isn't wrong

How was Germany losing because of America? Stalingrad and Moscow were won without any significant american deliveries.

Poland never held any "German" land, Germany merely occupied Polish territories and those have been returned to them.

>Moscow Strategic Offensive Operation, begins December 5th, 1941.

Mounting a counter attack doesn't mean they were winning, they stabilized their front after losing what... 1000 miles of land and half their military

And occupying a lot of land doesn't mean you're winning. The Germans literally did not have plans to fight a war longer than 10 weeks. The Germans knew they couldn't fight a war in Russia that involved counteroffensives and the front stabilizing.

You can occupy vast swaths of territory. The Japanese covered over 2,000 miles in their advance. They still had lost the war at Midway (which wasn't even a counter offensive), and arguably at Pearl Harbor.

>mexico can be a superpower in few years
It can't. It's populated by lazy mexicans, not by industrious germans.

That's dead wrong also, read Lost Victories by Manstein, Manstein's main plan was to retreat spread the Soviet's forces out then mass German troops in mass and strike deep with panzer division into pockets, then surround and mop them up. Hitler refused because he didn't want to give the impression of a weak Germany, which goes back to why I dislike him.

It really would have been an easy German war in Britain and Russia. Hell Von Bock and Guderian would have taken Moscow in September or October had they not swung south to Kiev.

>read Lost Victories by Manstein,
A man trying to salvage the fact that he lost, with any excuse he could come up with, and when he has no excuse, lies.

>Hell Von Bock and Guderian would have taken Moscow in September or October
No, they couldn't have. These are the same people that said they would be in Moscow by the end of July. Even if they had pressed straight for Moscow, they would have faced months of urban warfare taking it. Remember Stalingrad?

Now, remember that if you don't swing south the Kiev, You are way, way further extended then they were during the Caucasus campaign.

You are trying to fight, for months, with limited supplies, and ALSO defend every single point on a 1,000 mile front, with the bulk of the your enemy forces still standing.

Virtually every modern historian holds that the turn on Kiev was the right maneuver and none of them would believe a fall of Moscow by September.

>third world country
>even when post war germany that was buttfucked by bombing and soviet bix nooding had better HDI than the colonies.

I don't hate him.
He was a good soldier and even let men like Dietrich von Saucken disrespect him and openly disobey orders.

Hitler will go down in history as someone who almost conquered Europe and Eurasia.
Deal with it.