Current year

>current year
>still believing in sexuality

Sexuality doesn't exist, it's a spook, just admit it. All of you have masturbated to gay porn and heterosexual porn before, just admit it. And we all had that childhood friend we had sexual fantasies about.

While it's true that only heterosexual sex causes reproduction, this doesn't mean that homosexuality is unnatural. Animals participate in gay sex, and so have homo sapiens since the dawn of their existence.

If you actually believe that you are only attracted to one sex, man, your head is haunted; you have wheels in your head!

That's some cute projection there lad.

Nice projection, faggot, now go back to LARPing as a wolf or whatever it is you idiots do.

It's the truth. When you are sexually aroused by a girl's butt, only to find out later it was a man's butt, why do you feel embarrassment? Because sexuality is a social construct, not because you have a natural sexual preference.

>All of you have masturbated to gay porn and heterosexual porn before, just admit it. And we all had that childhood friend we had sexual fantasies about.
Dude, there's nothing wrong with being a fag. Just accept it and stop projecting.

please kill yourself

Or, you're just a fag that projects his fagness upon the world.

That would be true if humans were like other species and had periods of heat.

>All of you have masturbated to gay porn and heterosexual porn before, just admit it.
that's a big assumption there, lad. why do you assume everyone is bisexual because you are? have you considered how this is possible when there have been gay men who felt pressure to marry women but then struggled to have intercourse because they couldn't get hard?

>All of you have masturbated to gay porn and heterosexual porn before, just admit it.
That's one assumption too far. it's fair to say that we've all had gay thoughts at one point or another, but assuming that we've all secretly masturbated to gay porn is just retarded.
There's no reason for a lot of us to do so, because dicks just don't do anything for our boners.

>U R FAGOT I AM POWERFUL STRAIGT MAN
Go stick your dick in a mayo jar.

If you actually believe that you are born with a certain sexuality, I am sorry you are living in the 16th century, 17th century philosophers already debunked that

>Doesn't watch lesbian porn

Dick isn't attractive to anyone, it isn't even attractive to women.

Dude, boners want what boners want, and if they want something specific, that's no spook.

>>/lgbt/

My nigga, that's the best kind of porn.

If you are being told your whole life that being attracted to a certain sex is considered a 'bad' thing (even though being gay is accepted by a lot of people, the word 'gay' itself is still used as an insult), this will actually affect your sexual instinct aswell.

But everyone is born bisexual. If you'd grow up in a world where bisexuality is the norm, you would practise bisexuality.

OP is making point very badly here, but i think what he's going for is that sexuality is fluid enough that the strict categories are nonsensical. i don't think he's actually saying that every person is equally attracted to guys and girls and that we all jack off to both

yeah if you are a ten year old who is afraid of being gay for looking at dicks

>If you actually believe that you are born with a certain sexuality, I am sorry you are living in the 16th century, 17th century philosophers already debunked that
>philosophers
what the hell have philosophers proven about when sexuality develops? philosophy has its uses, but whether sexuality comes from nature, nuture, or a mixture of both is not a philosophical question. studies on twins have already shown that identical twin boys are much more likely to both be gay if one of them is than fraternal twins, which though it doesn't prove much does show that genes do affect your sexuality in part

>I only watch videos with big juicy cocks, because I like women :^)

>studies on twins have already shown that identical twin boys are much more likely to both be gay if one of them is than fraternal twins

This is because people love themselves by nature. The more someone looks like you, the higher chance you are attracted to him/her.

>i don't think he's actually saying that every person is equally attracted to guys and girls and that we all jack off to both
no, he specifically said that we all do jack off to both

Social conditioning can only affect sexuality to a certain extent. As the example mentioned by shows, people can still be physically unable to be attracted to a certain gender, even if they grow up in an environment where it is expected and encouraged to do so.

So now you're saying being gay is willingly inflicting self harm. Are you implying that homosexuality is a mental disease?

it was a metaphor mate

>people can still be physically unable to be attracted to a certain gender, even if they grow up in an environment where it is expected and encouraged to do so
Then that is a case of mental illness, an exception

>everyone who does not do as they are told has mental illness
wew lad

then there shouldn't have been such a large difference between identical and fraternal. in fact we should also find then that having more same sex siblings makes you more likely to be gay and vice versa

>Then that is a case of mental illness, an exception
so then everyone who isn't bisexual has a mental illness? that is most of the population

That wouldn't say anything. We still live in a society where the prefered 'sexuality' (doesn't exist btw) is heterosexuality. Family and surroundings also have a certain stance on 'sexuality', which will influence things aswell.

No, read the OP, everyone is bisexual except for minor exceptions

It's just that people don't know it because spooks

Well alright then, so you think that anybody who actually isn't born bisexual is just mentally ill?
Grow up and just accept that people are going to fap to what they want to, and fuck who they want, regardless of societal norms.
Sexuality is a spectrum, and it is true that most people are not born 100% one way or the other, but some people are (or are at least very close), and there's nothing wrong with them for that.

>Grow up and just accept that people are going to fap to what they want to, and fuck who they want, regardless of societal norms.

Tell that to someone living in Saudi Arabia dumbass, they will literally behead you.

And even in western society, there is still people deciding to stay in the closet, or refusing to find out their true 'sexuality', just because of societal norms.

>That wouldn't say anything
that would be needed to confirm your hypothesis which you made up to avoid admitting that genetics played a role. you've already been proven wrong on your next point with the example of gay men married to women, but you dismissed them as mentally ill. so which is it: does sexuality not exist or is having an exclusive sexuality a mental illness?

Mental illness is probably the wrong term, but it is definetly an exception to the norm.

This is why we need a seperate humanities board, for this cancer right here

your "minor exceptions" is the vast majority of the population. sure some of them are in the closet, but this cannot account for all them, especially those who have no reason to be in the closet like those who say they are gay. also acceptance of gays and bisexuals has become very mainstream in the West, meaning there is little reason to be in the closet for the majority of people

Without humanities Veeky Forums would be a /pol/ duplicate, humanities is keeping the balance here, it was a good decision to merge them.

>
Read: much more likely.

Ergo, not everyone.

Ergo, it isn't totally biological.

I never claimed it was totally biological, but you are dismissing that genetics plays a role at all

Yes this explains why there are more gay people now than 100 years ago.

When men first start becoming sexually active, they already know what the 'sexual norm' is, so the first thing they do is knowingly masturbate to women, and knowingly avoid masturbating to men. The people who start experimenting, and are at the same time brave enough to go against societal norms, these are the 'gay' men of today.

But if there was no society, there would also be no sexuality.

you have yet to prove that most claimed heterosexuals are actually bisexual

>falling for this shitty b8
lmao wew lads

It's impossible for me to prove this, this is just my personal theory and you are allowed to disagree

>But if there was no society, there would also be no sexuality.

If there was no society, there would be no humanity.

What motivates some people to follow the norm, though, and others to break the norm?

Your ideas are plausible, but you need to have some evidence other than just theorizing.

> (You)
I didn't dismiss it at all, but it seems to be a popular thing that sexuality is determined at birth, even though psychologists have been making the opposite claim for a century now.

if this is just your "personal theory" and you have no intention of trying to support it with anything other than baseless assertions then you shouldn't have posted here at all

Just like Genesis right?

Most philosophers don't support their ideas with evidence either, why should I have to. Philosophy has nothing to do with evidence, it's just ideas, although these ideas are ofcourse supported by things we have seen / read / experienced.

do you even know what philosphy is?

Yes, and my statement is correct. You probably never read philosophy before, because it isn't anything at all like reading a scientific paper or something.

>implying philosophy is useless

>implying I implied that
I did not, philopsphy is highly important

philosophy doesn't have the standards of evidence of science, but it is a bit more than just your "personal theory". your theory should be able to hold up to criticism. how many philosophers when challenged have just said "lol come on dude it's just a theory"?

Well yeah that's why I am not calling myself a philosopher. I haven't theorized enough yet to have an answer for all criticism, but I believe I am on the right path.

This shit is dumb.

What's your favorite ice cream? WHY is it your favorite? You just like it more than the others, right? It appeals to you more.

Why can't dick be the same way? It's just personal preference. Whatever appeals to you the most is just your thing. Simple as that.

I'm saging because this topic really doesn't belong on this board imo

OP is a genius

This is a point political lesbians dont shut up about. But I am not sure.

I mean, I am gay and I have never had the same level of arousal for a woman than for a man. Like, not even close. Fucking one...well, yeah, maybe I could? But it wouldnt feel like sex, more like a chore.

I wish I COULD enjoy fucking girls, but I just dont.

>same level
Where is that implied?

>OP was found like this 5 minutes later

Because I thought it was a girls butt, so I'm embarrassed I thought wrong, faggot

But you were still aroused by the men's butt, which makes you bisexual, if you want it or not

>being this much of a tr00 straight guy/dyke
speak for yourself

Dick isn't attractive to you, getting dicked or giving dick is attractive to you.

People don't masturbate to picture of dicks, this simply does not happen

You're a fucking idiot. If you get aroused by one of those trick pictures where a close up of a lamp looks like a woman's pubic area, does that make you lampsexual too, you retard??

When you get aroused by a part of someone's body, it's because your brain is completing the picture. Most men wouldn't feel aroused by the butt in your example if they knew there's a cock and balls hanging on the other side.

I like your arguments, but you are wrong

>using the smiley with the carat nose

Not an argument.

Solid point but it's a shame to point out this isn't an argument

What the fuck op. You threw out the bait and the ocean came. Who the fuck would fall for this

Bait is a spook.

>Sexuality doesn't exist
>heterosexuality exist
> homosexuality exist

ARE you insane in the brain?