Was women's suffrage a mistake?

Was women's suffrage a mistake?

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318628
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/supposed-iraqi-wmd-described-in-intelligence-dossier-resembled-inaccurate-portrayal-in-1996-holywood-a7123341.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>the revenue and expenditure keeps going hand in hand just as it did before
not according to this graph

pic unrelated

>a graph showing the effect(?) of women's suffrage is unrelated to the topic of women's suffrage
Why did you post the graph if you believe that?

>Was women's suffrage a mistake?

Yes.

Females have demonstrated time and again that they do not respect standards, and are less likely to make decisions that benefit society as a whole, if it discriminates against themselves.

Men, on the other hand, have demonstrated countless times that they will discriminate against themselves to benefit society as a whole, and this is seen in the establishment of standards required to get key jobs, like cops, firemen, soldiers, and even in academia.

Allowing women to vote is like allowing children to vote....dumb.

Yes it was

Women were the primary force behind prohibition, civil rights for savages and now gun control

Why would you give an emotional creature the right to vote in a logical debate about reason and law?

I guess it's not for the socialists.

If you are ever so slightly libertarian inclined, yes, women suffrage is one of the worst blight of recent history.

The bottom line is that women are at war with men in the west, but the men are just too fucking stupid to realize it, and too cowardly to confront them about it...

>b but guns kill bebbes and chilluns

Why?

yes women are tempermental statists and that's why they passed prohibition immediately after earning suffrage. Any sort of nanny-state no-fun-allowed regulation once followed leads to some pearl clutcher soccer mom advocate, raised the drinking age? women. smoker suppression? women etc

During the wars women joined the workforce and so became taxpayers. You pay your taxes, you get to vote.

Op's graph is just one of many proofs.
Women are collectivism: the gender.

I went to some libertarian meeting once (a few dozen people in a circle discussing some particular point with expensive food, some kind of irregular think tank). Literally one woman for 35 males. (All white too but that's another thing).
That's also why women are much more "left wing". They just can't into freedom. Even the rare lolbertarian woman (I'm looking at you Ayn Rand) comes off as odd and out of place.

>You pay your taxes, you get to vote.

Retards can work and pay taxes? Should retards vote? How about 15/16 year olds?

No, is the answer you're looking for...

You do realize that Aristophanes was a satirist, right?

>economic downturn before women can vote
>expenditures and revenues rise after women can vote
So apparently, economic downturns cause women's suffrage, which in turn causes increased spending?

>Allowing women to vote is like allowing children to vote....dumb.
A society that deprives its citizens of the right to vote based on age, race, or gender cannot be said to be democratic.

The narrative you attempt to push (Women = More socialism! More left wing!) is not generally applicable.

Women only started voting Labour when Labour abandoned any commitment to socialism (and indeed to basic human decency) in 1994 and 2003+ respectively.

Democracy is dumb

>A society that deprives its citizens of the right to vote based on age, race, or gender cannot be said to be democratic.

And?

Democracy is fucking stupid, and the U.S. proves that, as do our females, as we move further and further away from the representative republic we were founded as in the beginning.

Voting isn't a "right", it's a duty and a privilege, and should be reserved only for those MEN proven to have the capacity to make reasonable decisions.

Females have proven time and again that they make shitty decisions based on emotion, and not reason, that have fucked over society as a whole, and should therefore be removed from the decision making process.

Not that guy, but ye, that is why he wrote a play in which women had voting rights.

>Implying women are more emotional than men

Have you ever heard of testosterone?

ultimately all politics comes down to muh feels.

[citation needed] [dubious] [discuss]

Men are emotional creatures too. Most violent crime is comitted by men, and as leaders of countries since the founding of the first civilization, our desire to dominate others (fueled by testosterone) results in emotional decisions to start wars and other problematic events.

I'm not saying women are better than men, before you call me a cuck, i'm just saying that acting like men don't make emotionally fueled decisions is moronic.

Acting like one gender is ruining everything for the other is an /r9k/ tier idea.

this

Yes, and its precisely women's lower testosterone levels that cause their emotionality.

>and should be reserved only for those MEN proven to have the capacity to make reasonable decisions.
It was men who gave women the right to vote.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26318628
There you go.

Everyone makes mistakes.

But only men have to bear arms???

Why do men have to fight but not women? If women can slack out on their end why not men?

Men seems to make them the most often.

Women are the primary victims of war.

Clinton pls go

Testosterone causes men to act in the "masculine" way.

>You cause me to loose face in front of my warriors, so I kill you and rape your wife
>I delibiretely intellectually destroy a female colleague who I believe has overstepped her mark by challenging me in the office over something I said.

Shit like this user. It's all fueled by testosterone. Testosterone and oestrogen cause men and women to feel different emotions more than others but it's all the same fucking shit.

???

>muh "rational" misogyny

Testosterone works directly towards the amydala and inhibits the front cortex to take charge. You have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

Crime and war, both, are largely about obtaining resources, not "emotions". Resources that women and children benefit from alike.

>Acting like one gender is ruining everything...

One gender is indeed responsible, and that gender is men. They are responsible for failing to maintain control of their society, and allowing corrupted influences to negatively impact our culture.

Regardless, there's no fixing it now.

And it should be men that remove that "right".

>muh inconvenient truths

>>>>/tumblr/

There are millions of women more intelligent than you will ever be, with a bigger right to vote than you. How does it feel?

The biggest mistake since the French Revolution

Not him, but most women do not exploit their intelligence, and those who do are oddly silent when shit hits the fan.

You have to go back to the kitchen.

>women
>intelligent

is that scientific fact or just anectodes

No.

It's a scientific law that the kitchen is waiting for you.

Not according to your graph user

My own graph:
1974: Conservative (Right wing)
1979: Conservative
1983: Conservative
1987: Three-way-tie.
1992: Conservative
1997: Con-Lib tie
2001: Con-Lib tie
2005: Labour
2010: Liberal-Democrat (Liberals/Lib-Dems being centrist, they coalition with Conservatives resulted from the election.)
2015: Labour*

Total:
Con (4)
Con-Lib (2)
Labour (2)
Liberal-Democrat (1)
Three-way-tie (1)

*I'd be very interested to see if this was reflected at the election, as at the time Labour were polling 50/50 when in the end results they were defeated.

Unless you're getting at the awkward phrasing of when women started voting Labour. (Women didn't do so in the 1997 election following 1994's clause-4 moment, but that's when Labour started to clearly abandon the left instead of just the far-left. 2005 was the most recent election after Iraq, and the first one women actually voted Labour over everyone else in. Iraq was when Labour became definitive bastards instead of just a disappointment.)

I doubt it.

A smart chick is usually equal to the average dude.

Imagine a life where you have never been great at anything, never felt the urge to be great at anything, never felt that magnetic admiration to someone who was great at something, wanted to imitate and ultimately defeat him. Just nothing. Literally all you do in life is exist to post on Veeky Forums. Occupy space. pass the time.

You're bored, as usual, posting about your fucking dislikes and not even feeling any kind of happiness from it, just soothing your constant need to be bitter and cunty and petty toward other people. Every single thing you've done in the past year was mundane, shallow, boring. You spent the last six hours reading kinda-interesting plebbit stories about people who made interesting buildings for their populace or some stupid bullshit that you think is interesting and you may say is interesting but you're not really sure if it's really interesting. You're just fucking sitting there, gestating, fermenting, with a moist hole between your ears that guarantees you'll at some point have to get up and move around and perform physical labor to support yourself.

And then you see women, over in some corner, having fun. You've never seen this before. What are they even doing? Instead of their consciousnesses merely sitting in their thick skull and revolving around itself, they are imbuing their conscious energy and intentionality into external objects, crafts, goals, projects. All the bitterness and cuntiness you feel nonstop seems to be absent from them, as they congratulate each other for being victorious, and happily learn from someone who defeated them.These creatures are truly content to be alive. They have found purpose in a purposeless universe.

And your gaze turns back on itself, on your self, and you realise you've never had that.You can never have it. So you sit down, you post on Veeky Forums, and you fucking ruin your life, the whole fucking thing. The five seconds of attention you get will be worth destroying it.Because you're failure like OP.

Universal Suffrage, among both males and females, was a mistake. So to answer your question: Yes.

>muh inconvenient truths

The alt-right is composed of a bunch of retards who fancy themselves as being HARD MEN making the HARD CHOICES.

independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/supposed-iraqi-wmd-described-in-intelligence-dossier-resembled-inaccurate-portrayal-in-1996-holywood-a7123341.html

Oh look guys, a legbeard.

Sorta yes and sorta no. But the reasons why have nothing to do with that graph because correlation does not equal causation.

>>criticizing the alt-right by bringing up the iraq war
Full Retard.jpg.

Absolutely.

No but the United States was a mistake.

Eris on the other hand is not a mistake, and she is God. You should praise her name and the universal feminine default.

Agreed

No

*tips fedora*

Statism is dumb, let alone Fascism

How is that relevant to the post you are replying to? I said nothing positive about statism/fascism....

>>universal feminine default
lol man do people out there seriously believe this shit?

The irony

What do you think, idiot? Democracy isn't dumb, just heavily flawed. But obviously some edgelords don't like it all because of one subjective opinion on something. Lol
Kys

Yes.

Why reject Eris? All that creates inherits the chaotic feminine power. The first single celled organism, genderless, feminine, dividing by itself. Only through a chromosomal mutation could sex seperate. The default organism of any life form is the female one that bears fruit.

Women created all, and you are her creation. The drive of Eris and chaos exists in the fabric of reality, and the fabric of what you know. It is what drives you to argue with me right now. It drives you to be absurd.

You probably don't even believe in the law of fives.

I will not kill myself, there is too much to live for.

>criticizing the alt-right by bringing up the iraq war
>Full Retard.jpg.

The Iraq War is a handy shibboleth for assessing whether or not a person or group is actually to stupid to live without having to do any real reading.

okay

can you go back to LARPing/founding cults now please

Democracy is stupid because you are allowing uneducated, uniformed proles have a say in extremely complex issues that they don't understand

Can you?

>and should be reserved only for those MEN proven to have the capacity to make reasonable decisions.
How would you test for this capacity? And how would you prevent it from turning into something like the USSR, where only those in good standing with the ruling party can exercise any political power? There's literally no point in voting at all if you're going to place restrictions on who can vote.

You are about as deluded as the average bible banging dipshit.

So what? The Iraq war was a neocon project, Pat Buchanan was the closest thing to the alt-right that existed at the time and he opposed it.

>allowing uneducated, uniformed proles
Nice opinion, but the main flaw is actually that the majority will decide what direction the nation will take.
>Democracy is stupid
No, it's really not. But you're entitled to your opinion.
Like what? Fapping to your waifus some more? LUL

>You are about as deluded as the average bible banging dipshit.

How so?

>Like what? Fapping to your waifus some more? LUL

Nope.

Have any of you wondered whether your personal inclinations towards the female sex might be the driving force behind your reasoning? The ever so slight bitterness at rejection and failure to understand? Self-critique and introspection are the ways to wholesome knowledge.

You fucking idiot that's a copy of another pasta but men being the sex bitched and moaned about.

>The ever so slight bitterness at rejection and failure to understand? Self-critique and introspection are the ways to wholesome knowledge.

Nah.

>believing in a god
>no philosophical basis other than "women can make babies and uh single-celled organisms could make babies xdd that chaotic feminine energy xddd"

pretty cool religion my dude.

>Nope
Bullshit!
Are you saying that the guys itt are edgy anti-social retards? Lol

>mystical bullshit
>pop psychology
>shaming tactics

tits or gtfo

That why enfranchisement rules for who can vote and who cannot are total balls.

>Bullshit!

My waifu is irlaifu.

>pretty cool religion my dude.
>implying
>Eris
>believing
>religion
>my

Pretty cool religion my dude.

Did I honestly seem female? Man I'm good.

>How so?
Reread your own posts on this topic.

Everyone has personal biases that cloud their thinking. Everyone. It only seems to get specifically brought up whenever this topic is raised though.

My bad, I don't post on here often enough to recognize every form of copypasta that's been posted on the chan.

>Reread your own posts on this topic.

I just did.

How so?

You did desu

...

>My bad, I don't post on here often enough to recognize every form of copypasta that's been posted on the chan.

It's a pretty iconic one so I'm just surprised you never saw it ever.

Le hat may may XD

>>universal feminine default
Nonsensical statement #1

>>All that creates inherits the chaotic feminine power
Nonsensical statement #2

>>The first single celled organism, genderless, feminine, dividing by itself.
Nonsensical statement #3

I mean, I could go on here, but I honestly cannot be bothered wasting my time on somebody this stupid.

Did it start on /r9k/? I don't really visit there much or ever really. I also don't spend a massive amount of time on the chans in general really. I mostly post on /v/ and Veeky Forums typically.

>Nonsensical statement #1

There is no life in the universe, but when there was, it was chromosomally, default. X Chromosome. Men are Y.

Eve, or, Eris was the first form of life.

>Nonsensical statement #2

Life is absurd chaos and so is the universe. The universe creates, and it also creates life, for no reason that creates entropy.

There is no ordered, signified by God Eris.

>Nonsensical statement #3

You really can't tell metaphor. What are you doing on the humanities board?

not the fedoras, the main point of focus is their shirts. but the fedoras help reinforce the mockery

You seem to get this assumption from the fact that human cells are bipotential at the beginning of development, and in the absence of a 'Y' chromosome, a human embryo will develop as female. Semantically, this makes a human embryo 'chromosomally female by default', but that's as far as it goes. Non-mammals, especially asexual single-celled organisms, did not inherit this chromosomal chaos magic.

It's a shame that you didn't make any of this gaia wymyn cult nonsense up, because it's impressive how confounding and stupid it is.

>Semantically, this makes a human embryo 'chromosomally female by default', but that's as far as it goes. Non-mammals, especially asexual single-celled organisms, did not inherit this chromosomal chaos magic.

Do you understand how life works? Single celled organisms are the default, the X chromosome was the default as well.

What creates life is default.

>>It's a shame that you didn't make any of this gaia wymyn cult nonsense up, because it's impressive how confounding and stupid it is.

The point is its as confounding and stupid as your argument against it is. There is no use knowing what is outside your meaning.

The first single-celled organisms didn't have X-chromosomes, you mouthbreathing mongoloid.

I really do mean it when I say, "cool religion, my dude", because as a man with an intense femdom fetish I could see myself working subservient to a qt3.14 Eris priestess

>The first single-celled organisms didn't have X-chromosomes, you mouthbreathing mongoloid.

I never suggested they did.

You are conveying these sophisms with intentionally vague and disjointed English, pardon me for falling short of your point.

>You are conveying these sophisms with intentionally vague and disjointed English, pardon me for falling short of your point.

That which creates life is the default. Life is created for chaotic pointless absurd purposes.