Is aversion to homosexualoty innate or learned?

Is aversion to homosexualoty innate or learned?

both

Innate
It's natural to thing faggots are disgusting scum

Aversion to 'false positives' in your mate selection systems are innate. People can then be taught to hate the people who trigger this in them.

Innate, otherwise the west wouldn't need 50+ years of sustained media indoctrination telling us it's "normal".

There's a reason basically all civilizations hated fags.

In men, it was usually associated to losing status in most civilizations, outside Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

Bumming someone else was usually fine, though.

Homosexuality is displayed in every great ape specie and is very linked to dominance-submission. Except for bonobos, but those are the hippies of the branch.

I'd say it's natural to fear displaying weakness/vulnerability.

tottaly innate, i guess
for it's not natural
such as a grown up banging a child
it's just not natural
i dont see it as disgusting tho, and you moralfags are.......boring as hell.

>Aversion to 'false positives' in your mate selection systems are innate.

If this were true then why do we still find a significant portion of the population running with its 'false positive mate selection'? How do we explain such frequent occurrences of 'situational homosexuality' in prison settings and the like. How do we account for the prevalence of casual bisexual expression in large swaths of the female pop? Etc etc etc.

>Is thinking putting poop on your dick is gross innate or learned?

Hmmm...

Actually, children will smear poo everywhere with their bare hands, unless you teach them not to.

They'll also pick their nose, eat dirt, shit where they stand, expose their genitals in public, suck their own filthy feet, etc.

That's their own brand tho, homos play in other people's poo.

They aren't getting false positives, they're attracted to members of the same sex.

A false positive is considered by your brain for sex and rejected. For some people it's easy to turn this personal displeasure into active hatred for someone else.

There's a huge difference between gay intimacy being physically unappealing and spamming Leviticus 18:22 all over the place.
And even then the former varies from individual to individual.

At least give us a warning before you go full retard.

Apes have poo fights.

So you're opposed to anal sex. Or just homosexuals having anal sex?

They also cannibalize each other.

I see more clearly what you meant now, but I would still contend that situational homosexuality and the rite-of-passage 'wifing' practices we see in places like Papua call into question the 'innateness' of false positive aversion.

I bet you dream of wrecking a woman's ass though

>He prefers anal over vaginal

So lesbians are natural, but gay men aren't?

Few tribes do. As with humans.

I prefer oral.

Talk to me.

>he has to pick sides

How old are you?

Nope, poop is nasty no matter whose butt it comes out of. It's only because of Jewish indoctrination via pornos that anal has become desirable among plebs.

They're less gross that's for sure.

It is natural. Natural just means "not artificial."

>They're less gross that's for sure.

So you are saying... people who are attracted to women are attracted to women?

WEW LAD
E
W

L
A
D

Alright, bud. Have a good night. Don't let those Jews shoot chemtrails into your window tonight.

Everything is learned as everything is mental, there is no physical world except as a type of mental world.

Will this thread have anything other than just-so stories?

Hello /lgbt/

learned

Hello /r/redpill

Enjoy your memes but anal sex has always been considered perverted and disgusting and it is only the rise of pornography that has begun to change that perception.

Are we ignoring cognitive capacity of do those words not have meaning to you?

It's innate, tribalism is innate in us and differentiating between men and non men(people who go out of their way to pursue a lifestyle that is not normal) is what tribalism always was in its most basic sense. Us and them or is vs them.

Even in societies where fags weren't punished, they weren't thought of as men. In Rome male on male action between equals was a sin and illegal, I'm Greece it was men on boy because the other came with social repercussions and a lower social status, in Indian tribes homos were seen as some sort of hermaphrodites, able to be both female and male but they didn't belong to one of those groups

fuck off fag

Even the Rome, the biggest fags in history, restrict their male on male action down to top and bottom and the bottom were usually regarded as sub-man

It's basic nature to regard fags as gross, I personally don't have the particular need to burn them down in a trench but I prefer steering clear of them

>Except for bonobos, but those are the hippies of the branch.

Bonobos are some of the biggest fags. at least the females are