Should NEETs be allowed to vote? If they don't contribute to society, why should they partake in governance?

You should partake in governance if you are expected to follow government policy. This is everyone in the country.

Just like you should only pay taxes if the government is protecting your investment, not if you're just working.

What do you mean? Women are a valuable part of the workforce and largely perform the most important career in our society -- birth and child-rearing.

These kids look ridiculous, look at their poofy babyfaces. I would smack them so hard their heads would be spinning and they'd never recover.

If only the government hadn't set taxes and businesses had set wages and prices so it is impossible to support a family on one income...

salty salty remainfag
your're are really salty you know that?

Voting is certainly a bourgeois sham, but that doesn't make it meaningless.

Any truly socialist society must have elections to ensure fair representation and, more importantly, government accountability.

Voting for representatives is a sham.

Voting for policies is democracy.

No public is well-informed enough to determine policy

Wouldn't denying victims of structural unemployment the right to vote be kind of dickish?

Nobody is well-informed enough to make their own decisions?

T. Leftypol shill and closet paedo

If you hate NEETs so much, why don't make work mandatory and allow government to decide, where you should work if you can't decide yourself?

am i in r9k?

The real answer is that if you start limiting who can vote, then somebody has to decide what criteria to use. And that somebody will inevitably use that power to exclude groups that don't support themselves. Because of course, people who don't agree with me are mentally unsound and can't be trusted with a vote, right?

brexit pleb. go eat some fray bento's you fucking peasant

Teens for Trump are all goobers except for that one beautiful, beautiful mousy redhead /pol/ salivates over

I'd love to take her home and give her some of the ol' dialectical materialism, if you know what I mean

>fucking peasants

This isn't tumblr. Please use the appropriate vocabulary.

Didn't Trump say that if he's elected, he'll let Pence be President?

Only the landed aristocracy should be allowed to vote.

That's the group that should pay taxes. Their investment is protected by the government, and by the other citizens, so they should pay the governments and other citizens for this right.

Everyone who follows the law should vote on what the law is.

Well I'm a NEET and I don't have voting rights at the moment, doesn't really break my heart. My life just goes on.

>goobers
Back to /r/gamerghazi, SJW

Since when is the word peasant a tumblr word?

t. never been on tumblr

That's more or less what UK's electoral system was like until the late 19th century and even then it was only rich bourgeois tenants who got the vote until WWI.

Go cry over Nandos being supposedly closed you narrow minded twat.

>bourgeois
>aristocracy

Pick one.

Essentially. Eric Trump said the Vice President would have authority over "foreign and domestic policy"

>BOURGEOIS TENANTS
Up until the late 19th century only landed aristocracy could vote in the UKand it was then expanded to wealthy bourgeois tenants of said aristocracy to accommodate the changing social make-up of the wealthier classes.

>brexiter calling others narrow-minded
topkek

Oh right, sorry for misreading.

I suppose whether one thinks the bourgeois deserved the vote depends on how much of a reactionary one is. One hand there were plenty of tools in the aristocrat class at the time, but on the other the bourgeois industrialist/merchant class of the 19th century were generally a ruthless bunch of scumbags.

You can be a NEET and still contribute to society retard, like a monk or a philosopher

>monk is a NEET

Nope. Ora et LABORA retard.

Should single moms be allowed to vote? They consume more resources than they provide, raise troubled kids that consume more resources and vote selfishly to get more welfare?

Those are workers!

Sorry I don't speak spanish

Americucks need not apply

You said it, brother!

This should be done but without a religious component.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devşirme

Except for the over 70 I agree with all of this.

Good response.

Why not? Why should someone who most likely has 10-20 years of life left, vote to affect the next 70 years of someone's life?

Okay I'll conceit that I don't actually support this and I'm being edgy, but it's not entirely a bullshit argument.

>People who should be allowed to vote
People I agree with on every topic

>People who should be sent to gas chambers/gulags
People I disagree with

The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing. Only white land owners should be allowed to vote.

Seconding.

On a macro level? Nope.

people who should not be able to vote
>People with different oppinions than me

No one should be able to vote or hold public off. Until they have completed voluntary service to the nation.

The pictorial of "fuck boys"

>there are people in this thread right now that actually voted to remain within the EU

Representative Democracy is a sham! Who agrees?

I agree. Work changed my life, made me a decent person instead of a hedonist wastrel.

Nobody should lose their right to vote, fuck off edgelords.

I doubt they fuck

...

Should OP be allowed to post? If he doesn't contribute to the board, why should he partake in shitposting?

girls shouldnt be able to vote and only the eldest patriarchy within your government personhood should hold a vote.

Only I should be allowed to vote

I'd fuck them hard

Why are right-wing women such putrid whores?

/thread

I'm a homo, not a yeastie.

The question is: If NEETS dont contribute anything to society out of their own ambition and they are allowed to vote, should children be allowed to vote to? They both just generate costs for the state.

Why is there no caste system with the possibility to get "Promotion" to the next higher cast through own ambition and work?

That's basically the USSR