Why do women have archieved less than males?

The lens works, I assure you. The lens which couches demographic and social changes in terms of ideology...is a piece of shit.

Don't think that's fair, user

Go to any socialist party meeting and you'll see tons of women

Women might be generally drawn to liberalism, but that's because media focused on women is so blatantly capitalistic

>socialism

...

> Don't think that's fair, user
This is objective fact. 90% of famous people are males.

Women seems to be pretty retarded to not be able achieve anything despite same IQ.

>Go to any socialist party meeting and you'll see tons of women

socialism is the girliest of all ideologies, no surprise.

it's all about care for the other and helping eachother but god fucking help you if you don't agree with the way things are going.

/r9k/ is leaking again

All communists are bearded men user, the fascism is girly one with muh feels and such invented by literal liberal arts failed major.

>hitler invented fascism

communists are all lanky, smelly "men" that wear glasses they don't actually need in my experience.

Do you have the original non commie version of that meme for me pls?

even if this thread happened to prove some kind female inferiority, what are you trying to achieve?

because remember, all you're really saying is a bunch of great smart males are better than a bunch of great smart females.

you re still left with neckbeards on Veeky Forums claiming to be on "team man" but couldn't even write Pride and Prejudice.

Woah dude

Women were legally considered property instead of people in most places until the recent few centuries. Oppression isn't a meme.

>Women were legally considered property instead of people in most places until the recent few centuries
ever heard of serfdom friendo
Also, women weren't considered property after the roman empire became catholic.

i wouldn't mind an utopia in which i can look up to women as much as i do to men.

how do we fix women, or rather, the way society raises women, Veeky Forums?

> couldn't even write Pride and Prejudice
I could if I really want to. :^)

Technically they have achieved more.

Consider the fact that every last person in history grew inside and was born of a woman. This alone is a most highly significant contribution.

I think that's a stupid argument because they wouldn't be born if a man didn't dump semen into that woman.

In other words, men accomplished everything a woman has if that's all they have to claim for importance.

>Dude is fantasizing about communist revolution.
Woman wins

That's still a few thousand years of catching up to do.

Also, societies for centuries made the classic mistake of putting pussy on a pedestal, so women has few incentives to achieve anything of note. The few who did usually did it because they were autistic as fuck, and usually had to be married to get their foot in the door.

>you need to be a commie to think about commies

Nah, the real MVP are microbes that evolved into the animals and shit. All humanity wouldn't exist without them.

>why do women have archieved

nice work there, champ

The investment required for successful reproduction is much higher for women than it is for men.

Men hypothetically have only to dump semen. Women need to carry the growing infant inside her for 9 months, absolutely rekt her vag and maybe die in childbirth, and then spend the next 5 years nursing and caring for the little bastard.

The whole point of that chart is that women DON'T have the same IQ as men. They have the same AVERAGE as men. And let's face it, men with average intelligence rarely accomplish very much, either.

No, but the wealth distribution pic certainly suggests that's exactly what he's doing.

>Men hypothetically have only to dump semen
yes because humans descent from fucking cats and don't tend to live in groups

>humans descent from fucking cats

(((hypothetically)))

That's abstract, what's the point

damn it to hell

Because the average man could kill the average woman with his bare hands

what the fuck are you rambling about?
that's not the question that was asked

By who?

No. Creating a society is far more complex than shitting out a spawn 9 months after intercourse

I don't know why I laughed at this

>Women have depended on men to survive.
>women dont have survival instincts
Hey Davis, where the fuck did you put McArthur?

>Women have depended on men to survive.
>women dont have survival instincts
You DO realize that those two things have nothing to do with each other, right?

Patriarchy

Where do I find the average man and the average woman?

maybe im not really being serious in this shit thread...
Also my real answer is that for the entire recorded history societies were patriarcal. the shit we know about matriarcal societies is miniscule...

It is strange that even in the modern era they don't make up 50% of the significant contributions to society

Its like they would rather worry about the least important things in life, that pic is pretty apt

In the average place

Matriarchal societies are failures

[citation needed]
which are you referring to?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Township,_Hendricks_County,_Indiana

???

All of the ones that failed to continue or make a mark on the world, ie all of them

Hull?

Women are the property of men
always have been, always will be.

>flawless logic
how rational of you...
Despite matriacry being a realtively short societal occurance globally somewhere before the late stone age
when litterally no one made a mark...

davis pls

there's no real evidence of "matriarchal" societies at all
most are due to confusion over the difference between matriarchal and matrilocal

It failed to live past the stone age, it was a failure

an all the so-called matriaqrchal societies today are either not "really" matriarchal, or completely isolated and primitive in nature.

As you can see in western Europe today there's a good reason we avoided women as influental leaders

>to live past the stone age
its not like they all litterally died you retard...
(realtive) abundance of resources made the focus of society shift away from tribal lineage (direct survival, muh bloodline...) and to provate property...
ofc...depends on what you are willing to call matriachal...

>depends on what you are willing to call matriarchal..
well a matrilinial/local society isn;t matriarchal

African Americans are Matrilocal but not matriarchal.

also its a load of rubbish anyways because it doesn't promote hierarchy unlike a paternal clan

Why would women do ANYTHING if men can do it for them instead (men were created to be women's slaves in the first place)? "Achieving" anything is just males' silly way to dick wave and whore for women's attention anyway.
Chilling through life is the way to go.

Confirmed for being a real woman

Nothing to be ashamed about, my dear slave.

Why do you separate males and females? When you watch a nature documentaries women and males are separate from each other as they do different things worthy of showing on film.

But more importantly when speaking of the species as a whole they do not differentiate between male and female.

A males accomplishments are a woman's as we share in the loot, in most cases. We would be literally nowhere if there were no woman, same as if there would be no men. Doing this is literally pointless and is just e-peen stroking. We are all humans - and whether you be free the slaves or inventing iPhones most people in most times would always rather be busting a nut inside a woman.

>using technology as a metric for success
>using anything as a metric for value
That's not how it works.

Because it has always been in their nature to live off of the hard work of men.

>commies
>accomplishment
Pucker butter boy

>human race
>not oppressed
Stay bluepilled, carbonfags

>giving birth/raising some of the most innovative and influential males of all time
>not a major acheivement

The short answer is that, given that women were forced to be baby machines for the majority of civilization, they took the roles of child rearing full time.

I assume your mother didn't do this which may explain your issues with women.

Yeah no shit it's complicated.
But the most important factor in a successful society is growing and holding up over time. That means the passing of human generations. Women raise kids. You can follow this logic.

They are subhuman mentally that base their decisions of stupid irrational emotions rather than logic and common sense. This means their idea of life is to be an egotistical parasite to every other person and what do you know thats exactly how they act.
Without the sperm those humans wouldnt even exist so raising successful men isnt no major achievement compared to the stuff men alone have done.
>forced
No no no you are baby machines thats all you are good for fucking and raising babies.

Men are curious ambitious creatures we are nothing like you human parasites at all, we achieved we did because of our own accords not to get your attention. As if the guy who discovered algebra gave a flying fuck what girls thought of him, or the guy who invented the steam engine and so on.
The real reason men insist on doing work is because we know women are lazy uncaring pieces of shit that will fuck up everything and that will get us mad and make us murder the breeding stock.

Men hold society, women destroy society everytime they get human rights like what you see today, rather than get married these wild animals insist on destroying the family unit all for cock.

the worst and the best people are men. this is what i'm talking about: . it's necessary that life as a woman is more stable because they're the ones bearing children. that leaves men at the edges of the distribution doing big shits.

Achievement is often measured in extroverted outward actions, the domain of men. The home has been the domain of women historically, and there women ruled. So we just hear less about it.

Women having more stable IQ graphs just means their intelligence diversity is shit compared to men.

You aren't much of an accomplishment if you still rely on mommy's internet and government money. Quit disgracing the male sex.

Also these

...

>Thinking Communist Thoughts
>Is sexist
Pick one and no I am not a communist it's just your image contradicts itself.

>thats all you are good for fucking and raising babies.

Ignoring the blatant /r9k/, you think that I'm a woman because of something I said. That says it all, there.

>reality tv

nice spook

Sure is /r9k/ in here.

whoa shit you sure stewed that guy by projecting your own self worthlessness on him

i wish i could be a master debater like you

oh shit its a male feminist

beware everyone

>reality TV and all of recorded history
>nice spook

>No no no
>what do you know thats exactly how they act.
I hope you're baiting and not actually this autistic. If so I pity you for whatever trauma made you that way

>all of reality
nice spook

literally half the month is spent bleeding estrogen from an open wound between their legs

Even if I was female, the point is that it's retarded to think that demographic determines a person's ideology.

Why can't you keep your retarded threads in

>vaevictis.jpg

This is more of an /r9k/ flavor desu