Did sub saharan africans have pre colombus contact with the americas?

Did sub saharan africans have pre colombus contact with the americas?

That's the dumbest looking face i've ever seen

No. It's been proven wrong by historians. Afrocentrism is retarded. These "theories" claim dumb shit like the Olmecs collosal head were facing west in remembrance of their homeland, when really they were facing east.

Probably not.

You gotta know the trade winds pretty well and have the ability to sail upwind.

But africa is both east and west from the americas

If it took Europeans that long to colonize The new world what makes you think some stupid niggers did?

They didnt need to colonize it. Maybe they just visited it and the natives thought they was black gods and made these heads with black features

>black features
>big nose and lips are exclusive to blacks
Fuck off nigger

How do that injun have any black features? These colossal heads were obviously made by blacks or made by people who admired blacks

Not a very good example considering the completely different nose and lips.

No, literally no economic reason or enough seafaring tradition to successfully pull it off.

Probably not

Yes in 1001 AD when Leif Erikson explored america

& austral for like 100k years up to about 5k ago

Absolutely, 100% (as in there is no way in this earth save supernatural intervention that could have happened) NOT.

According to the abstract of Columbus's log made by Bartolomé de las Casas, the purpose of Columbus’s third voyage was to test both the claims of King John II of Portugal that "canoes had been found which set out from the coast of Guinea [West Africa] and sailed to the west with merchandise" as well as the claims of the native inhabitants of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola that "from the south and the southeast had come black people whose spears were made of a metal called guanín...from which it was found that of 32 parts: 18 were gold, 6 were silver, and 8 copper."

Africans once ruled the world there is no debating this no mo.

If anybody decided to visit the Americas,It would most likely would be native South East Asians/Oceanians

I might be wrong, but isn't that what Hawaii is?

Nicee

Nope. There is no archeological evidence to support that claim.

Central Americans have big noses you stupid fucks.

>These colossal heads were obviously made by blacks or made by people who admired blacks

...

...

...

This is the flag of Corsica.

Was Napoleon black?

Has the pivotal black role in the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars been covered up?

...

Isn't there actual evidence of Oceanic admixture in indigenous Chileans?

Yes, they flew their rocket pyramids there.

>rocket pyramids
Everyone knows they used EmDrives

They all look like exaggerated caricatures of people with Mesoamerican features (Them Indian eyes) proportioned in such a way to fill out a big square shaped boulder.

WHICH IS THE DIRECTIONS AFRICANS WERE FACING WHEN THEY REACHED THE AMERICAS!

CHECKMATE, ATHEISTS!

Yes, that explain the Pyramids in America.

They're native amerindian features, Tyrone. Stop trying to erase native agency and voices, and check that black privilege.

They did find a negroid skeleton in south america

Look up "luzia"

Excuse me, but noted historian John Green said that generic evidence may one day PROVE that Mansa Mussa visited the Americas, implying that there is a plethora of non-definitive evidence for Africans visiting the Americas.

Only denialist neo nazi retards still deny that the West African did visit the Americas (especially South America), it's a stright line, take a canoa and you're there in less than 2 or 3 days if the wind is strong, Africans aren't retard, unlike Neo Nazi sperglord want you to believe, so they did manage to make basic ships and yes they did visit South America on their voyages as this user said there were reports of "guanin" people visiting the Caribbeans:
I wouldn't be surprised if they did reach the Olmecs, but they sure did visit Central/South America and the Caribbeans during historical times under Mansa Musa and other kings, they were rich and interested in these kind of "deeds" and reaching the Caribbeans wouldn't have taken more than a bunch of days with a good wind and a week with shitty wind.

1491 and a study I found hinted that it might have been Australiods or whatever you call it that might have made it to South America.

No mesoamerica had contacr with sub sahara

>2-3 days reaching the America's on a simple shitty rafts
>took Europeans 2-3 months on galleys

Retarded nazi fuck leave the thread, you do not argue like this.

>What is distance

Look at a map retard

Anyway let'see it's one even two weeks, you stuff enough food in your ship and you're fucking there, it's a straight fucking line to Brazil

No that's completely wrong. Subsaharans couldn't invent a wheel yet could travel by raft to the Americas?

They didn't have HORSES you retarded fuckwit fuckboy white retard.

And you do realize that Polyneasians reached fucking Easter island and probably South American with primitive technology, they didn't have the wheel any many other stuff, you retarded fuckwit.

Polynesians were more technologically adcanced than sub-saharans. Sub-saharans couldn't even built a canoe up until the white man showed them how to.

All sub-saharans "kangdoms" we're all influenced by northern neighbors. In the case for west Africa it was Arabs, in the case for Nubia it was ancient Egyptians and in the case for great Zimbabwe it was Arab slave traders or Indian spice merchants.

Check mate.

You nazi fuck, SubSaharian were tons more advanced than Polynesians, look at their fucking sculotures, more beautiful than ancient Greek ones and as old as them ins ome cases you retarded neo nazi poltard fuckwit.


And huh theyw ere influenced you don't say?

Al civilizations have been influenced somewhat by other civilizations you retarded poltard.

you called him a nazi fuck in every single reply that you had with that guy. you must be right just because you called him a nazi cuz we all know nazis=bad/wrong

>Sub-saharans couldn't even built a canoe up until the white man showed them how to.

Please provide a source

>All sub-saharans "kangdoms" we're all influenced by northern neighbors. In the case for west Africa it was Arabs, in the case for Nubia it was ancient Egyptians and in the case for great Zimbabwe it was Arab slave traders or Indian spice merchants.

Kek, give us 10 european civilizations that werent influenced by non-europeans

>we wuz Indonesians n sheet

Pre 1700? In modernism everything influences each other. Let me take a crack at this.
>Denmark
>Austria
>Switzerland
>Ireland
>Finland
>Iceland (Technically Denmark at the time but fuk u)
>Poland
>Hungary
>Sweden
>Norway
Not counting France, HRE, & cet because of their adoption of hot ottoman fashions at the time, and not counting England, Spain, Netherlands, et cet because they were busy fingering the far east at the time. I could name more but we would get into arguments over >but muh small ethnic groups!!! >they drank tea so obviously they were Indian!

Thing is that Injuns get wiped out by diseases. On the other hand plenty of african slaves run to the wild and mix with natives or even form independent tribes.

Going with the racial traits of Native Americans, the heads could be their depiction of their ancestors, before the society began to breed with local natives