Can anyone here redpill me on the history of Turkroaches?

>converted to islam after arabic conquests
>adopt persian language and customs after arriving in persia
Did not even finished reading but this is wrong, it was persians not arabs that converted them. They did fought a lot against arabs before that though.

...

Not really. The Arab conquest of Transoxiana is what led the Turks to become muslim,

Conversion by sword is a meme pushed by atheist, turks did not became muslims in 700s when they were being slaughthered, their conversation happened slowly in centuries. Just as Persia did not became totally muslim after the fall of sassanian empire.

and most of the islamic evangelism done to turks were done by persian muslims

I never said they were converted by the sword. But the conquest brought Persian language, culture and Islam to the Turkic people.

converted to islam after arabic conquests is a bit far fetched, they convereted to islam because of persians. Yes persians are muslim because arabic conquest and so on, but thats a one large chain, in that same logic, Rome fell because mohammad was born. Yes there is a connection but again the connection is very long.

just semantics, I know.

The connection is hardly long. The conquest of Transoxiana is part of the Arab Conquests and brought the area under the controls of the Arab Caliphs.

Under the Umayyads Turks were mainly servants working in Persia and hence picked up Persian culture and language. Under the Abbasids they became soldiers and generals which led to them eventually conquering the Abbasids.

>>Turks come in and kill them all

Wrong. As with every single other civilization ever, only the ruling class was foreign. The people living in Turkey today are mostly the exact same people that have lived there for thousands of years

I'm saying that conversion of persians played a far greater role than conquest of transoxiana. Turks resissted islam most during umayyad aggression, and they converted most during the post umayyad era.

Though I'm not an authority or anything, I must say that I'm just parroting Ilbert Ortayli's theory, he might be right or you might be. Though I'm not knowledgeable enough to abandon an academicians theory and place my bet on you (no offense) I cant find where he stated this but If you have any sources about islamization of turks I would be glad to check them out later on.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_genocide
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_genocide

The turkified greeks-armenians-assyrians killed those who remained christian, what is your point?

...

You really think the turk nomads holocausted all the native anatolians and greeks when they conquered byzantium, you fucking moron?

I really don't understand your point, I'm not baiting.
Turks arrived around 11th century, they were a minority, in ages some locals became muslim-turkified while others maintained their original culture and remained christians. In the late 19th-20th century, genocides-exiles-agreements occured, which created a more homogenous nations. Genetically turks are very similar to armenians and greeks, the difference was cultural and religious. Enver looked far more like an armenian than like a slant eyed mongol

That just blurs the line between different groups of people and ethnicities. You may as well apply the same logic to Germany and the Polacks during the final solution.

The line is blurred, nearly a thousand years of turkic dominion, greeks-armenians converting to islam, turks converting to christianity (google karamanlides) does that.

Turks did not teleported to asia minor in 1870 and began to slaughter the native greeks-armenians. And up until late 19th-early 20th century there were plenty of Christians in asia minor, and plenty of muslims around balkans. The genocides the population exchanges did cleared the blurred lines and made it more homogenous