When did you realize that the horseshoe theory was in fact, true?

When did you realize that the horseshoe theory was in fact, true?

Other urls found in this thread:

madmonarchist.blogspot.nl/p/myths.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

When I become a centrist who feared to hold a coherent political position.

Its close enough that its relevant. I wouldn't say its a fact.

> not question mark theory

have the horseshoe be more curved towards the center and I'd agree with you somewhat

the political compass graph is the most unbiased and as a result best way of depicting political leanings.

>Rand Paul
>Liberalism
Pick one

Horseshoe theory is correct in that both the far-left and far-right are more willing to restrict individual freedom for their aims than centrists. However, this makes no impact on the truthfulness of ideologies on the ends of the horseshoe.

Never heard of classical liberalism?

hillary clinton: somewhere outside of the question mark, her propoganda team created it to get elected

>he uses a two dimensional political classification system
>not a three dimensional hypercube

kek

>hypercube is three dimensional
do you even four dimensionality
obviously not

> three dimensional
> hypercube
Hypercubes are 4-dimensional objects.

>inoffensive centrist democracy
>father knows best state
>moralistic democracy
Is this from nationstates.net?

Yes. Glad that you remember.

Who is Piano Model here?

What's the difference between NatSoc and Corporatism? What's the difference between social democracy, democratic socialism and neo-liberalism? What's the difference between anarcho-capitalism, libertarianism and anarcho-syndicalism? Why is populist nationalism right below communism there?

this thing is like a horoscope reader

>ancap
>natural rights
>property
My keks.

>fascism is corporatism
literally pulled from USSR propaganda

>correctly recognizing that fascism is near the middle of the road

It actually is. "Corporatism" is just widely confused with "corporatocracy". The latter is control of the government by businesses, while the former is the organization of economic sectors into "corporations".

It is true, but miss understood. It's agaist extremism not promoting centrism as some golden way.

kek ancap as the best thing ever. Ancap isn't freedom. if it has capitalism IT WILL NEVER BE FREEDOM, because it will always have a central bank or someone kind of authority figure controling the money.

my attempt at a non-euclidean spectrum

thoughts?

might add more later and change some things when I am bored again, constructive criticism is welcome

That's the worst image ever.

I fucking hate Americans whenever politics comes up.

>4 dimensional hypercubes can't be projected in a 3d environment
Bet you believe that a cube can't be unfolded in a 2d shape.

Many tried to unfold the cube, most of died who are tried, you will be next. Remember the word.

You are free to choose who rules you as an individual, which bank, which corporation, etc.. Can't get more free than that.

This is so accurate it scares me.

hope ur joking

You're a slave to having to feed, clothe and house yourself, and not being guaranteed a way to earn capital so you can make your own megacorp.

If you could guarantee those things, that a person could find work that results in advancement, ancap would be okay.

Are you me?

>tfw find myself agreeing with progressives on some things
>tfw find myself also agreeing with fascists on some things
>tfw find myself agreeing with a mish mash of paleoconservatism, anarchism, and monarchism and whatever the fuck else
>tfw i realize that there are no good or evil ideologies, only the implementation of said ideologies matters

J U S T
U
S
T

OP is a faggot

>This user has ascended in intellect over most on Veeky Forums

It seems like your knowledge on each ideology is based on their fundamental and basic claims.

Don't worry the more you read about various ideologies the more streamlined and coherent your political beliefs become.

I also don't blame you for being confused because the best ideological system for politics, morals, and law isn't a single coherent ideology yet.

A lot of ideologies are challenged by their own ethics and values. Some of which resulted in death and others of which resulted in off shot movements and philosophies. That is what manages to frustrate the majority of political movements is making their ideals practical and able enough to withstand legitimate practice, versus just simply applying it in theory.

You're pretty close m8, soon enough something terrible will happen to you like one of your parents will die or something and you won't even care about ideology anymore.

>That's the worst image ever.
Boy you haven't seen nothing yet

...

Christ...
This shit is cancerous...

Libertarian or go home.

>Wanting an end to capitalist exploitation
>altruism
Reminder that Marxism is founded principally on self-interest. Karl Marx did not set out to create a moral philosophy, he described what he saw as inevitable, since the more numerous proletarian armies would defeat the bourgeoisie and take the means of production, all in their own self-interests.

Why is Calvin there, and why the fuck is he farthest right?

The top is pretty bad already but the bottom hurts my brain

It always made me cringe. Basically you are defining yourself to be right whatever your perspective. It's an model for idiots who can't tolerate arguing against anything other than a single unified opposition.

(((their))) self interest

Same

The more I learn the more undecided I become. There's seems to be good and bad for everything and there isn't a single system that can really satisfy everyone

...

>there are no good or evil ideologies, only the implementation of said ideologies
How about you read a fucking book rather then the wikipedia page for anarcho-capitalism you fucking idiot.

this is actually pretty neutral
the only thing is that the FUCKING COLORS ARE REVERSED REEEEEEE

Congratulations on becoming a sane human being

Charts like these should be banned under any moral system of political thought.

Meh, I've had a parent die, one wife die of breast cancer, and another commit suicide... And I'm still where he is.

A mobius strip would be more accurate. (I'd put political ideologies on it, but I suppose it doesn't much matter where you put em.)

>Any philosophy, taken to its ultimate extreme, is ultimately poisonous.
>Including this one.

You do realize the Gnostic/New Age shit is satanic aswell, right?

It's literally what the occult believes in.

It would be more accurate if the left said "Servants of Jesus Christ" and the right "Slaves of Satan/sin".

And the tinfoil guy a Bible-holding Christian.

>monarchy
>bad

Why do so many people not understand monarchies?

madmonarchist.blogspot.nl/p/myths.html

Also kings can be God-chosen, see David and Solomon.

When will americans stop branding libertarianism as its own ideology

Do they also think that "authoritarianism" is an ideology on its own rather than just a way of qualifying other ideologies?

The redpill comics are obviously tongue-in-cheek.

Your contribution to this thread was pollution.

>doesn't know what classical liberalism is

Wew.

>tfw infp, existentialist, communist
wew

when did you realise that the left-right dichotomy is a myth?

not just yet it seems

>moral
>political thought

desu people who build their politics off of a shitty infograph are braindeads

nice argument!!!1!eleven!!

this is so shit. wtf...REALLY MAKES U THINKHUH

>because of memes that were old when WW1 was fought literal despotism is now seen as similar to a welfare state

horseshoe is "true" because left-right makes no fucking sense

I thought horseshoe theory was always about the behaviors of said groups, though? As in, you can support a good cause and still be a huge fucking hypocrite or crazed nutjob about it, too.

I'm not sure there's a good way to implement whatever the fuck North Korea's got going on over there.

Intro to Philosophy was a fun class. Our journal exercises ended up being a great way to point out how 75% of what we studied was self-defeating.

>Populist Nationalism
>Between Socialism and Marxism

What if I'm an INTJ and believe in white nationalism and socialism instead of a hard economic right and hard social left, moral-less anarcho capitalism?

By that reasoning everyone is a slave to nature you fuck.