Explain why this place have so many population compare to other parts of the world ?

Explain why this place have so many population compare to other parts of the world ?

Rivers

India's on track to surpass them in population

No competitors, geographically isolated. Some naturally occurring resource abundance in its topographic formation. Took 3000 years for the west to reach and influence it via Communism in 1939. Historically sheltered on all sides from the Mediteranians affluence (tibet, india, mid east, siberia, nippon, americas, SEA)

True citie on a hill. Perched atop; Xionagu, Hun, Mongol, Manchu. And now Communism, falling back in on itself, finally.

Communism, Socialism, Democracy, always mark civilisation resets. Always.

like they were geared and ground into dust by foreign powers (japan russia anglo etc). communism also stopped that pattern from repeating. good and bad.

>Communism, Socialism, Democracy, always mark civilisation resets. Always.
Pls elaborate. What do you mean.

Rapid economic develop with little to no oversight.
General ambivalence and disdain for the natural world in Chinese culture.
Corrupt and morally ambiguous magistrates, bureaucrats and officials.
A populace that values money over environmental safety.
A drive to remain competitive among low wage manufacturing export economies who loosens regulations.

He's being an ebin memelord.

You eradicate natural standing hierarchies that often create the channels to growth through which the masses climb but when you reset and say we are all equal like that that avenue for new technological innovations through growing productions of scale (etc, steel industry in america early 1900s, etc) is lost. It solidifys a people but its at the mean and you gamble your lowest common denominator for your highest (Nietzsches sentiment somebody said is in line to this?? raise the average by raising the lowest??)

Its like sticking a spanner inside a combustion engine. spanner soc, comb eng human nature

we're all inherently born different with different abilities, levels of control etc as innate as ur belief in self ownership and property rights. not to politically hijack Veeky Forums through the law of human nature..

Tolstoy the fatherhead of an european eastward directionate aethiest prototerian movement was an orthodox aristocrat herelled in pacifism, no?

Socialism has diminishing returns the more open source & lines of the spread/propogation of information & knowledge are (innate that free market mechanics gave the rapidness of the rise to such prominance).

you tell me

see: similatires, and the differences after

like a big wave, crashing on the shore.

again i state because of roman boots, the west stood, whilst the east fell.

why didnt china colonise the americas, why did europe get there first (greater degrees of 'novelty', chaoticness, more open markets - greater rise of innovation, chance, choice, exploitation. now that the earth is owned it will have to go through a new evolution of the idea of how to conquest others - police states, ideological subversion/expansion, the difference as to why one fails and the other succeeds, effective use of time and resources, jurisprudence etc)

when i say first i mean last

>silent tiers for rhodesia

flow will always take the path of least resistence

first through an idea phyiscal geologically spread across the surface of this map

secondaly the changing progress of what ideas through spacestime

money is made in the margins, wealth generated, the pie enlarged

To start with its fucking massive. And unlike most of the places in the new world, or russia, its near on 5000 years of growth by the same people.

Fetus and dog meat have magical effect

>A drive to remain competitive among low wage manufacturing export economies who loosens regulations.
this can be countered by increasing regulations (america lowered its reg hard since 2000 - lobsters from the pacific since fuku etc, but for the rest of us) and exploiting new market growth (example, cannabis)

High test alpha studs.

Advanced agricultural techniques and cultural conditioning allows faster population growth and sustenance for a significantly larger population.

>You eradicate natural standing hierarchies that often create the channels to growth through which the masses climb
Yeah like in pre-revolution tsarist Russia, amiright?

Most of your post resembles a schizophrenic word salad but I think I get the gist of what you're trying to say.

Are you arguing a society with no "resets" ie revolutions that would replace the ruling class would be the most successful? Do you not think it would grow stale once those at the top have more or less secured their position?

>pic

Tsarist Russia was nothing more than an anglo-saxon vassal.

I'm saying greater degrees of personal freedom are condusive to collective advancement.

guns, drugs , self defence and self use etc.

Because it's fucking massive with no big cold spots or especially crazy weather phenomenons. Same with India.

the majority of the chinese throughout history lived on subsistence farming in a simple agrarian society

and this type of lifestyle is very stable, independent, and simple, and requires/produces alot of children

and in 1900, china, russia, and india had almost the same population size

russia abandoned agrarian system and industrialized which deflated population growth
modern china is still primarily agrarian, it was even more agrarian and subsistence for the last 300 years, with a steady

No offense but please learn to make more comprehensible posts. It really is a mess to read.

live free or die, man

Wow you really answered the question there user!

If the KMT Nationalists took over, I doubt they would ever increased in such large numbers

Also, the Manchu Qings mandated there to be huge increases in population