Who was in the right?

Henry VII had barely any right, but he won the battle so that's all that really matters

he did have a few drops of plantaganet blood from his mother

York. When the Duke of Hereford (Henry IV) cucked Richard II off the throne, the descendant of Lionel of Antwerp should have ascended to it. The line of the Duke of York later married into this superior claim

>mother

Yes and his father was only a Welsh knight. Patrilineal descent mattered far more than matrilineal. And Richard III's father was a Plantagenet. It's not even a question, Richard was entitled to the throne

youtube.com/watch?v=xLongUBPm5Y

My husbando, obviously.

Probably Richard.

Given that Henry I was a Lancastrite who married a Yorkist, couldn't you say they both ended up winning? As stupid as that sounds.

Henry VII. Sorry for the typo.

>just like my theater play
oh wait, too early

Lannisters!

>One side kills the leader of the other side
>Oh, but hey, it's like we both won

>random fourth rate cousin barely a rank above peasant manages to win the throne after the entire family is massacred or exiled
>doesn't even call himself a member of your house
>WE WON LADS

both

Queen Elizabeth and by extension her family the house of Woodville

were with the Lancastrians when it was appropriate, moved onto the Yorkist cause when it was most logical

Jacquetta led and trained a cunning pack of swamp witches

true king probably should've been Prince Richard "Perkin" Plantagenet of York though