Are people who say "there's no replacement for displacement" actually retarded...

That extra low end torque tho

Twin charging

Nissan GTR or Ford GT.

Don't reply to heartbreaker, he's a dumb lot jockey mad at the universe he's too poor to fix that old shitbucket of his, while also pretending that he's interesting because he moves rich cunts cars around.

Superchargers are limited to the belt not slipping and only make like 10 psi, turbos are better, you may not have quite as much low end torque but you make up for it with double the superchargers gains in the top end>rekt

At this point it's all down to how the engine is built and driver skill; are we gonna start talking about our favorite drivers in the "biz" now?

It's a lot more than most of Veeky Forums will ever achieve

Put your trip back on faggot

>o-other people are poor too so m-my situation is okay

Name a STOCK production 625+ HP naturally aspirated V8 that can pass emissions without the help of a hybrid system.

>makes more power
What makes more power than what?
>better low end torque
What has better low end torque than what?

If your "situation is okay" why would you be so upset about a user of an anime imageboard?

Any proper turbo setup will give low end torque as well.

If muh supercharged v8 is so good why is it a 11 seconds slower to accelerate from 20mph to 50mph in top gear than a twin turbo v6?

A naturally aspirated V8

I'm not upset at you, I'm just sharing information about your stupid ass.

This could all go away if you stop tripping.

Only reason would be because it's got a longer gear ratio.

Also stupid fucking post 1/10 made me reply

This. Even I, Alphonse, stopped namefagging. There's no reason to be an attention whore.
It's also slower than a 911 Turbo S. Sounds like you're just making excuses.

But it also has a lower top speed
V6 is the superior engine

You'll have to be more specific, there are thousands of naturally aspirated V8s

>I'm not upset at you
You're making up random shit about a named user on an anime imageboard in hopes that he will stop using a name because you aren't upset? Doesn't sound realistic.

3.5L EcoBoost in the F150 vs the 6.2L in the Silverado.

>You're making up random shit
Its known around here that you're a lot jockey, and you definitely post pictures sitting in rich peoples' cars, and you most certainly have a shitbucket Comet that needs paint

>Superchargers are limited to the belt not slipping
Just like turbos are limited by max RPMs
>and only make like 10 psi
No
>turbos are better
No
>you may not have quite as much low end torque
No
>but you make up for it with double the superchargers gains in the top end
No
>rekt
No

I'm not saying the opposite of what is true, but everything you just said is a load of bullshit.

Here's a naturally aspirated V8 that makes 900 ft/lbs of torque at 3000 RPM. Which TT V6 can do that?
ohiocrank.com/enginespage1.html

>Its known around here that you're a lot jockey
Is it, or did you make that up? Why would a shop that sees 10 cars a week max need a porter? What would I be doing the other 39.5 hours a week?

>shitbucket Comet that needs paint
The paint is sitting next to me right now

>modified
>2500 rpm
>can't pass emissions
Literally pleb tier.

The 3.5L EcoBoost engine delivers over 600 lbs ft of torque at 2500 rpm. All you have to do is turn up the boost and it's making more power at a lower rpm. BTFO!!!

it doesn't work

Tits

i love sucking cock

mmmmm delicious

Lurk moar faggot.

im pretty sure no turbo v6 will ever be as good as a 6.2l mercedes naturall aspirated v8

shut
thw fucking you pup
nigger

Are you alright bro you seem to have had a stroke

But doesn't that mean a turbo V8 is better than a turbo V6?

>can't pass emissions
*citation needed
>if you modify a TTV6 to also not pass emissions it can make 2/3 the power of an NA V8
Wow, displacement has totally been replaced! How many TTV6s are putting out these numbers? -
gtspeed.us/2015/03/22/this-1600hp-reher-morrison-726ci-engine-almost-killed-the-dyno/

>accidentally leak my trip
>5 summerfags still can't type it in correctly

>can't pass emissions
btfo (just like gm)

kys cuck

kek, btfo

LSX
>776 hp

youtube.com/watch?v=CfFTOUfhOu8

>10 psi

>can't pass emissions
btfo

Cruising gear made for highways vs. gear made for more acceleration

Order from best to worst (nocars will never understand this)
1.Naturally aspirated
2.Supercharged
3.Electric
4.Turbo

All flagship are naturally aspirated for a reason dumb queers.

>superchargers better than turbochargerers
lol no

>nocars will never understand this

>has no logical arguments
>i'll use ad hominems
>That'll show em!!

>greentext
>reaction.jpg to mask his irritation
>that"ll show em!!

lmao

>no argument
turbo>supercharger

stay mad

-No low rpm torque.

-Boost relies on engine rpm, so you only reach max boost at max rpm.

-Sounds shit

-at low rpm, the boost is negligible and is actually a liability for horsepower as the supercharger requires more energy than it produces.

To name a few off of the top of my head.

>educating the retard

don't plz ruins my fun

Say something to prove your point then

no

>no low rpm torque
wrong

>sounds shit
Subjective

>at low rpm boost is negligible
no

Prove me wrong

>pushrod v8s

lmao, literally a cuckstamp at this point

Send your best car sound impression to 2282380839

yes, that's why gm lost lemans