Will GM ever create a turbo V6 or better V8 to compete with the F150? Right now...

Will GM ever create a turbo V6 or better V8 to compete with the F150? Right now, their current V8's are inferior for hauling. Not to mention they're slower to 60, still prone to rusting and don't even have a 5 star crash safety rating.

Other urls found in this thread:

caranddriver.com/comparisons/2015-chevrolet-silverado-vs-2015-ford-f-150-2015-ram-1500-2014-toyota-tundra-comparison-test-2015-ford-f-150-vs-2015-chevrolet-silverado-1500-2015-ram-1500-2014-toyota-tundra-final-scoring-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-6
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Can you hang yourself already? I don't even care how correct or incorrect your arguments are, but your daily Ford shilling is just fucking annoying.

Why would they cuck their truck? Sounds like if you need a safe space you go with ford.

Literally everything I said is a fact. Stay mad, dumbass.

I find it entertaining that someone is so bothered by GM that they have to make 30 threads a day complaining about it.
imagine hs life lol

What? steel doesn't even rust. Typical ford shill that doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.

>"steel doesn't even rust"
>tells others they don't know what they're talking about

>steel doesn't rust

Will you ever stop dreaming about Henry Ford blowing a load in your mouth?

No, I don't think you will.

so gm will always be shit?

>it's a ford vs GM muh truck thread

...

>chevy ad

I didn't mention GM.

Who dumps shit into a bare ass truck bed?

First of all, the F150 isn't aluminum. It's aluminum alloy. Second, GM is going to aluminum in 2018. And third despite being "high strength steel" it still can't get a 5 star crash safety rating.

They already make some pretty great Turbo-Diesel I4 engines.

Duramax is breddy gud.

>Chevy modified the ford bed to make it look like shit

>implying bedliner will make it stronger than steel and a bedliner

>exact same ratings

So easy to trigger ford fanboys

You think they faked that ad too?

>exact same ratings
no
>chevy isn't biased
so easy to trigger gm fangirls ;^)

>post yfw a chevy V8 can't outhaul a ford V6

ford>gm

kek, they're slower to 60 too.

>>implying bedliner will make it stronger than steel and a bedliner

It's still a pretty stupid test. Anyone who gives a shit about their truck, regardless of material, will have a bedliner.

Not him but I think GM changed the Ford's bed to demonstrate that. In a similar ad by Ford which was tested by 3 athletes (a hockey player, a shot put dude, a baseball and the golf guy), the F150 performed well better than that showed by GM. Obviously Ford cannot launch a truck that have its bed torn by the most common things. GM was desperately trying to fame their "Chilverdado". So lame, that was.

>gm literally cannot outperform a V6 ford
When will they accept that EcoBoost engines are the future of performance?

caranddriver.com/comparisons/2015-chevrolet-silverado-vs-2015-ford-f-150-2015-ram-1500-2014-toyota-tundra-comparison-test-2015-ford-f-150-vs-2015-chevrolet-silverado-1500-2015-ram-1500-2014-toyota-tundra-final-scoring-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-6

Here nignog

>post yfw a chevy

All 2016 Ford F-150s score an overall 5-star rating.

It still tows less you stupid fuck, you literally just proved my point.
GM BTFO!!!

Not so fast, kiddo.
All 2016 Chevy Silverado 1500s Score the exact same as the Fords.

>he still can't read
>11,800 > 11,500
>more HP, more torque, more payload, cheaper

Ford fangirl BTFO

Dude wat

>literally cannot read
It was only capable of towing 9000 lbs in testing.


>towing with 4WD
lol

I thought they failed the overlap test?

>more torque
Irrelevant when you have to rev 2000 rpm's higher to get it.
>more hp
Irrelevant when you have to rev 3000 rpm's higher to get it.
>more payload
Theoretically, it still lost in real world testing.

You might want to read that again.

>max is literally listed right there
>completely ignores safety ratings because you're a dumbass nigger

>still failed to beat it in testing
Learn to read. The F150 literally won the comparison. Are you retarded?

>he UNIRONICALLY posted an article of a F150 winning the comparison

GM BTFO!!!

Nope.

>samefagging because you're so autistic you have to have the last word
Kek. Nocar nigger.

>has no argument
>he literally posted an article of ford winning a comparison
BTFO!!!

How does it feel to know if it weren't for Obama GM fangirls wouldn't have a company to stand by?

The Chevy is listed as marginal at the small overlap front test with a poor rating for the lower legs.

>gm still tows more
>engines don't blow the fuck up
You want a link where the ram wins a comparison? Like it matters, your poor black ass has never bought a cheap car, much less a new one.

I own an OBS F-150.

I'd buy a V8 Silverado before a cuckmobile EcoBoost.

>Chevy has a better V8 by far
>Chevy trucks aren't made out of beer cans
>My Chevy could pull your ford even with your mom in it.

Interesting.
I wouldn't. I live at altitude, so I'm willing to bet that the EcoBoost would beat the 6.2 handily in effective towing tests.

>ram wins
lol

The CrewCab is even worse than the extended cab.

Is that why they're going to aluminum in 2018?
Enjoy being inferior.

>b-but we got a five star crash safety rating u guise!!!

GM BTFO!!

>gm tows more
lol

The IIHS and NHSTA are completely separate organizations. The IIHS tests are much more demanding than NHSTA tests. The small front overlap test is particularly killer.

Will anyone ever top nazi engineering? Mericucks still stuck with inferior engines while posche is raping its way to 18 lemans wins

Wrong thread, buddy.