I knew Camaro owners were retarded, but I didnt know they were stupid enough to pay $40k for a v6 muscle car

I knew Camaro owners were retarded, but I didnt know they were stupid enough to pay $40k for a v6 muscle car

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/NKGrE-CoFUs?t=25s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Askin ain't gettin.

/thread

blah blah blah

>40k for a chevy "sports car" with 280lb/ft of torque
vid related
youtu.be/NKGrE-CoFUs?t=25s

The v6 actually sounds somewhat decent too

why not compare it vs a base ecoboost?

and those results aren't one sided really
mustang wins in 1/4 mile and 0-100 and camaro wins in some areas too, but its really close

so essentially you can get the same performance, better in some scenarios for 4k cheaper with a mustang

nice one chevyshits

Read the image title, practically the same car.

Also look at the base price, once gain practically the same.

I dont understand why you are shitting on chevy when ford does the same shit with a turbo i4.

the point is the price

ecoboost can be had for 26k but the v6 chevy can't

the camaro in the op is turbo'd

Its 28k for a base v6, omg 2k is gonna brake the bank

Also who pays msrp for a car

In the end they are practically the same car with practically the same price tag, find something better to complain about

Also anybody who buys a "muscle car" without a v8 is a cuck

The listing is incorrect. Check the dealer pictures of the engine compartment to check for yourself. Not a turbo to be found

>check the dealer pics
>no link
.....

They're as fast as a V6 Honda Accord lol.

>he can't read
look at the OP pic again

>wanting me to manually type the name of the site into the url bar and search for this fucking car when you can just post a link
How about eat a penis?

go fuck yourself

>turbocharged

>spoon-feed me plz

>Turbo AND a V6
Is this a new car? I'm 90% certain there wouldn't be a turbo for the V6, even as a dealer option.

its not turbo

wrong listing

Precisely why anybody who buys one of these is a cuck