Best in class torque

>best in class torque
How can V8's even compete?

Other urls found in this thread:

f150ecoboost.net/forum/6-f150-ecoboost-chat/14799-my-2011-just-hit-250-000-miles-2.html
foxnews.com/leisure/2013/05/15/ford-owners-sue-saying-ecoboost-engine-defective/
fordf150.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=121411
fordf150.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=120721
f150ecoboost.net/forum/31-f150-ecoboost-problems/14354-official-blown-engine-thread.html
consumeraffairs.com/automotive/gm_silverado_brakes.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

By being a class above

don't these have really bad overheating issues?

No?

Yes. Don't tow anything with them and you'll be fine.

>truck engine
>don't tow anything

???

they can't

Let's see how these pieces of shit hold up when a sizable number of them clock in 200,000+ miles

There's plenty of 200,000+ mile Ecoboost engines. Stay BTFO.

Turbo > V8s

Technology is here gramps.

By the way a Mazda 2.3 4 cylinder makes more HP and Torque than the faggy ass Ford 4.6 V8 found in old pick ups and mustangs.

This lol.
>470 lb/ft @ 2500rpm
>with 10% duty cycle

>the Silverado has to rev to 4100 RPM to make peak torque
Why are V8s such shit?

>the Silverado has to rev to 4100 RPM to make peak torque
>@ 100% duty cycle
You were saying?

That V6's are better. Learn to read.

>gayzda
>thinks its all about hp and torque
Kekold

>his V8 has to rev to 4000 rpm to make torque

>10% duty cycle is better than 100% duty cycle @ peak torque
Kek, it's not me struggling to read.

#REKT
When will enginelets learn?

My 7.5l makes peak torque at 2800rpm.

>reving higher is better
lol
>"high strength steel"
>gets broken legs in a crash

1/10
(like the duty cycle of the f-150 kek)

>makes less torque
>has to rev higher to make less torque
lmao, V8 cuckolds BTFO

>reving higher is better
Literally not what I said. You're still struggling to read?

>still struggling to read
No, but apparently you are.

>muh duty cycle
lmao, stay btfo

Fucking rofl
>assmad V6 cuck can't event load a hand carry tool box into his "truck"
Lmao. Next thing he'll post EGTs thinking a higher value is better.

>V8 cuckolds literally on suicide watch after a few posts
lmao, typical

>projecting
LMAO!
If you could understand what you were reading, you might not be so anally annihilated.

>deflecting the truth
STAY BTFO!!!

The Silverado literally cannot compete in class. BTFO!!

Prove it

>26 replies 11 images omitted
Lol lmao btfo ecoboost cuck v8 v6 damage control assmad

There summed up the thread for you. Sage

Inline 6 diesel Cummins if you want mass torque at low rpms.

Why is that anime kid so angry at v8 engines?

>spoon feeding retards
Do it yourself. Google it.
assblasted V8 cuckolds spotted

>in class

There's your answer.

It's easy to be the big fish when the pond is small.

Because they're not Ecoboost

>deflecting truth
ROFL
The projection is strong with this one.
I don't blame you though, I'd be deflecting the truth like you if I was getting BTFO this hard.

>be V6 cuck
>make outstanding claim
>can't back it up
>deflect truth as last resort
LMAO

>projecting and deflecting at the same time
You've reached an all time low.
>no! spoon feed me!
No, cuck. Do it yourself.

>stuck in an infinite loop of deflecting and projecting
LMAO!
Have fun idling for 10 minutes of every minute at peak torque rofl.
I guess duty cycle isn't relevant when your bed can only manage 10% of its claimed payload before folding like a paper cup kek

>no! spoon feed me!
Not him, but you're making the outstanding claims, it's your responsibility to "spoon feed" results.

>projecting this hard
>no evidence of duty cycle having those effects on the ecoboost f150

Why not just make an 'eco'boost V8?

>spoon feed me
Fine, cuck.

f150ecoboost.net/forum/6-f150-ecoboost-chat/14799-my-2011-just-hit-250-000-miles-2.html

>There's plenty of 200,000+ mile Ecoboost engines.
>1
BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
>implying Ford isn't too embarrassed to publish such an embarrassing duty cycle
Better stick to peak outputs and appease the bench racers LMAO

>One guy
>all freeway
>no towing ever
Hardly counts. Anyone could do that

>post evidence
>no! keep spoon feeding me!
Stay BTFO, cuck.
>"implying ford is too embarrassed"
>no evidence
BTFO!!!!
>spoon feed me!
>BTFO!!!

foxnews.com/leisure/2013/05/15/ford-owners-sue-saying-ecoboost-engine-defective/

>2013
>not knowing they update their engines yearly
>muh lemon F150s
BTFO!!!

>the high mileage truck you posted was 2011
So you can use things from the past. Bit no one else can?

>post evidence
No you haven't.
>plenty=1
LMAO

>posts an article about the ford taurus
>muh lemon vehicles
Congratulations, you found 2 lemons out of over a hundred thousand trucks sold that year. Good job.
>no! spoon feed me!
No, cuck. Do it yourself.

Its the same engine moron

I wonder if you idiots have realized that all Alphonse does is post the exact same images with varying responses that include "cuck", "BTFO", and "t.assmadgmfangirl" and all you have to do is not reply. You're arguing with a brick wall.

>infinite loop of fallacy
Kek

>muh lemons
lmao
>can't deal with the truth

fordf150.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=121411

The only thing that happens in that case is he spams furry OPs because his ecoboost EGTs got him hot under the collar LMAO

fordf150.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=120721

>muh lemons
>posts two lemons in 2013
>posts one in 2015
lmao
>ford flex
It is literally still using the 2009 Ecoboost version. It hasn't been updated besides the interior.

f150ecoboost.net/forum/31-f150-ecoboost-problems/14354-official-blown-engine-thread.html

consumeraffairs.com/automotive/gm_silverado_brakes.html


>"I've owned GM vehicles for more than 15 years and have always had great experiences until getting my 2015 Chevy Silverado. The truck started vibrating at highway speeds, around 12,000 miles. I've brought it in for service multiple time, and the dealer can feel the same vibration, but do not know where it is coming from. They had a GM engineer drive the truck and after he rode in the truck he recommended changing the ring and pinion in the rear end to no avail. The truck still vibrates the same. I've contacted Chevrolet and have basically been told to deal with it, the truck is within specs. They are trying to bribe me with a 60 mos/75000 mile bumper to bumper warranty. I asked them how does that fix the vibration problem. I was told if I do not take the warranty, they are closing the case. Extremely disappointed!"

Yeah GM sucks too.
What of it?

From your own source
>only one out if 15 years of examples is bad
Kek, already has a better track record than Ecoboost

Cherry picking lemons out of thousands sold each month is bullshit.
>didn't even read the entire list
Stay BTFO.

>huge list of blow trucks.
>cherry picking
Okee dokee.

>V8 cuckolds BTFO this hard

Holy shit, they still sell the flex?

>huge list
Relative to what? They sold over 700k trucks in 2015.
Yes, for some reason Ford hasn't updated it yet.

>its not shitty cuz they sold a lot of them
>implying they dont all have problems
Logic escapes you

>"its not shitty cuz they sold a lot of them"
Never said that, dumbass.
>implying they dont all have problems
[citation needed]

You still haven't explained how a few problems compared to the millions sold is huge. You obviously have a warped view of "huge". Nor have you citated the total amount of problems with the engine.

*cited

>Never said that, dumbass
Its exactly what you said.
Now take things out of context to continue your argument to defend your terrible engine.

>it's exactly what you said
No, I didn't. Learn to read.
>now continue to take things out of context
As long as you continue to avoid my arguments. ;^)

>be Alphonse
>get so buttflustered I struggle to read my own posts
>claim others can't read
You can't make this stuff up LMAO

>claims there's a "huge" list of blown trucks
>can't tell the exact number of blown trucks
>claims all Ecoboost's have problems
>can't cite that either
>resorts to shitposting
I see I've won.

>claims there's many examples of >200,000 mile examples
>1
You're the real winner, even after being spoonfed LMAO

>claims there's a "huge" list of blown trucks
>can't tell the exact number of blown trucks
>claims all Ecoboost's have problems
>can't cite that either
>resorts to backpeddling
Stay BTFO.

>claims there's a "huge" list of >200,000 mile examples
>can't tell the exact number of examples
>can only show 1 against literally 4 failures
>cited ITT
>resorts to backpeddling
LMAO, not even a script writer could come up with this!
>yfw 4 Ecoboosts prematurely shit the bed for every one 200k+ example ecoshit a shit

>claims there's a "huge" list of blown trucks
>can't tell the exact number of blown trucks
>claims all Ecoboost's have problems
>can't cite that either
>resorts to blatant lying
k

>claims there's a "huge" list of >200,000 mile examples
>can't tell the exact number of examples
>can only show 1 against literally 4 failures
>cited ITT
>resorts to an infinite loop of logical fallacy
LMAO, not even a comedian could come up with this act!

>can't even address my points
Mods delete this thread, nobody deserves to get fucked this hard.

>can't even address my points
Right back at ya!
>claims there's a "huge" list of >200,000 mile examples
>can't tell the exact number of examples
>can only show 1 against literally 4 failures
>cited ITT
>resorts to an infinite loop of logical fallacy
BWAHAHAHAHAH
>yfw 4 Ecoboosts prematurely shit the bed for every one 200k+ example
LMAO! You're killing me!

>literally ignoring my points
k

>literally ignoring my points
Right back at ya projectionist
>claims there's a "huge" list of >200,000 mile examples
>can't tell the exact number of examples
>can only show 1 against literally 4 failures
>cited ITT
>resorts to an infinite loop of logical fallacy
I won't be seeing my sides for the rest of the week
>post yfw Alphonse becomes so rump ravaged he actually asks the mods for help hiding his own shame

>makes a claim
>doesn't provide evidence
Stay BTFO.

>makes a claim
>doesn't provide evidence
Yeah, I've already stated you can't. But then by your logic, "providing evidence" is "spoonfeeding".
>claims there's a "huge" list of >200,000 mile examples
>can't tell the exact number of examples
>can only show 1 against literally 4 failures
>cited ITT
>resorts to an infinite loop of logical fallacy

>yfw 4 Ecoboosts prematurely shit the bed for every one 200k+ example

>by your logic it's spoonfeeding
It isn't though, you need to cite the exact number of blown trucks. Additionally, you need to prove all Ecoboost engines have problems. Not just 3.
>has no evidence to support that claim
You need to cite the exact number of Ecoboost's over 200k for that claim to be true.

>It isn't though, you need to cite the exact number of +200k mile examples
ROFL, it's fun cherry picking points.
>plenty of examples
>1
My sides have turned into a satellite.

>can't cite the exact number
>damage control
BTFO!!!

>gm fangirls this stupid

>no bedliner

What retard has a gasoline v6 in their truck and not a v8/i6 turbo diesel anyway?

t. triggered v8 cuckold

actually I prefer the i6 turbo diesels over v8 td.

daily reminder a ford v6 has NEVER EVER won le mans but a ford v8 has MULTIPLE TIMES
v8>v6

Ford still has won lemans. Nice job moving goalposts though.

if v6 is better it would be able to win le mans but it hasnt
stop damage cnotrolling

>more damage control
V4>V8

>There's plenty of 200,000+ mile Ecoboost engines.
>1
BWAHAHAHAHAH
>yfw Alphonse damage controls so hard he deletes this initial claim
Everyone will remember where they were when Alphonse got BTFO