Is the C63 AMG the best performance car under 100k? The reviews say little to no flaws in this car. They say it's even comfortable like an S-Class when you want it to be.
I have saved up 100,000 and I need a performance car. I may not take it to the track but it's for daily driving. Also this car tops out like below 80K and I think I can safely pull my trigger at this, right? What do you think?
Bentley White
Also if you think there is a better daily performance car than the C63, please do say. Make sure it's under 100K.
Adrian Walker
>CTS-V >GS-F >BMW M5 >Challenger S R/T Hellcat >Chebby Camaro SS >Ferd Shelby Mustang >Z06 Corvette There are plenty of other options out there depending on if you want pure speed, confort, or a bit of both (which you presumably do). I'm personally not a fan of Mercedes after my dad's E63 AMG Wagon had multiple electrical issues and needed a transmission replacement under 30k miles.
James Long
comfort*
Tyler Roberts
I'd go for the F80 M3, it performs better on turns and is cheaper Also i kind of dislike the wet fart exhaust sound of the new amg's
Christopher Turner
I don't particularly want a coupe as I have a wife and twin babies. Alternatively I'll go for the M3 but I'll wait for more opinions on the C63 AMG.
Christian Bailey
If you spent a long time saving up 100k it would be foolish in my opinion to turn it into 60k in a year buying something like that. If money ain't a thing then sure.
Jayden Green
This is just my opinion so take it with a grain of salt, but I hate the interior of these cars. Realistically you're paying a large amount of money for a well modified and tuned C class, which means you do get the shitty, cheap interior with some cute carbon fiber bits and maybe different seats and a new steering wheel. I'm assuming you're getting the 2017 facelift version which I haven't seen yet so this might all be a moot point. That's just what kept me from seriously considering one in the past.
M cars are an option despite Veeky Forums constantly shitting on them. M3 or very lightly used M5 would probably treat you very well.
Caleb Anderson
Adding on, if you're willing to buy used you can get an M6 GC for less than $80k with around 20k miles, or a late model E63 AMG S/ CLS63 for around the same. These are all light years ahead of the C63 and still under factory warranty. I'd strongly recommend looking in to any of those cars, but the C63 is a very good car in its own right if you insist on buying new.
Jonathan Walker
Buy the AMG and invest the rest
Alexander Fisher
>Is the C63 AMG the best performance car under 100k? no.
>Alternatively I'll go for the M3 but I'll wait for more opinions on the C63 AMG. so you're a moron then?
Pic related. Best performance car under 100k. >manual transmission >415 HP 6.2L LS3 V8 >IRS >magnetic Ride control means comfy when you want it, fantastic performance when you need it. >under 50k
Grab one now before production ends.
Ethan Martin
>no V12 >under 7 litres sounds like a cuckmobile desu user
Xavier Price
skinny tires. buy a real performance car with meat in the bones and have something to show for your 100k desu dont get a tarted up 40k car for your 100k
>b but youre superficial
buy a car that looks like it costs 100k
Lucas Allen
buy a used 997.2 Turbo. better performance, better looking, better resale value, more fun, etc.
James Rivera
nice beetle.
Juan Hernandez
how do i obtain one of these?
Blake Sanders
>Mercedes It's shit
Leo Clark
it is. the hair blow dryers on it make it really fast
Christopher Lopez
buy a aston martin one-77 or a zonda
David Ward
I agree that this thing is a beast but the CTS-V is better (and much better looking)
Jason Cooper
GET THE GUILA U I L A
Lucas Price
its better because it has a supercharger? CTSV HAS A TERRIBLE TRANSMISSION have you driven that? slow shifting pos. at least the ss has a third pedal
Cameron Stewart
Shit I forgot about that. You're right actually I'd probably rather have an SS just for the manual. That or an ATS-V
Oliver Cooper
Buy a used Corolla and buy Ethereum with the rest.
In one year you'll have enough money to get a Chiron.
Alexander Bell
"no"
Christopher Peterson
>GUILA Lol how did you manage to fuck up the name so hard? Btw, i would get it over the competition no doubt.
Benjamin Green
no one asked for your opinion you cancerous tripfag
Colton Lopez
So the general opinion is to buy a Cadillac. So which should I get? ATS-V or CTS-V?
I have a question about the CTS-V. It has the same engine the Z06 uses so does that mean there will be future heat issues with the CTS-V?
And I liked the SS too.
Hudson Foster
The ATS is on Consumer Reports and Motortrends "do not buy list" for awful reliability ratings and poor interior.
The CTS is just a comfy camaro though, so get that.
John Garcia
Stop bitching, faggot.
Hunter White
>Glorious Italian Design >Fantastic sounding 3.0 Twin Turbo V6 >505hp / 0-60 3.8s > Manual transmission >Active aero, great suspension, etc. >Better performance and price
I don't what's not to like about it.
Jace Martin
i like my m5. I've driven an s-class and I used to own an XJ and I really prefer the balance of BMW
Lincoln Turner
The ATS is based on the Camaro, not the CTS. Never heard about those reliability issues either
Hunter Nelson
I can't understand why any sane person would buy one of these new, the value will plummet way more than anything else in the class. And it won't be reliable.
As a used purchase though, absolutely. Lovely looking thing.
Isaiah Watson
other way around. Camaro is based on the ATS, as is the new CTS. All of them use the Alpha chassis, but the ATS was the first one out, followed by the CTS and then the Camaro.
Jack Turner
hellcat charger or one of those new jaguars would probably be my pick if i were you
Brayden Flores
Pretty much all performance cars in this price range are dope. I say go for a test drive.
Dylan Walker
Best performance car?
Nissan GT-R
Hudson Williams
I've driven some of the newer sports sedans but my favourite has been the M3 so far
Levi Peterson
Yes
Brandon Price
>automatic only
Connor Taylor
>Paying more than 40k for a car >not being a professional driver >getting a manual
Are you fucking stupid. Modern automatic gearboxes are faster than any fucking manual there is. Also most performance cars have paddles for sequential drive.
Samuel Price
>Camaro is based on the ATS Yeah you're right, that's sort of what I meant to say. But anyway, the ATS is certainly closer to the Camaro than the CTS is. If only it had a V8.
Oliver Hall
>muh paddles I get the feeling you've never actually driven a manual. Or any car at all for that matter.
Landon Davis
one will fit
someone will do it soon
Cameron Scott
Dude, I live in europe. I have driven more manual than automatic(even my current driver is manual), but i would still get automatic if i were to splurge so much money on a new car. It's so fucking convenient it's amazing. And performance trade-off is negligible unless you intend to fucking go around a race track.
Henry Gonzalez
They include CUE in reliability issues. I can easily see it being unreliable at that point. God, CUE sucks donkey dick.
Noah Robinson
if I were you I would buy a slightly used 911 turbo or a new 911
Evan Thompson
>tfw distinct Alfa front end I remember one of my teachers in primary had a 159 in black. It was an imposing looking vehicle.
Josiah Rogers
The GT-R would be terrible with a manual you would have to remove most of the 4WD system since no computer could keep up with the ass hattery of most manual drivers
Same with the LFA in manual. You'd kill the engine in a week