Is there any ideology that can properly accommodate sociopaths or people who don't feel empathy?

Is there any ideology that can properly accommodate sociopaths or people who don't feel empathy?

Politics and prison culture.

Neoliberalism

Anarchy.

All of them do.

SJWs, white nationalists, black nationalists, commie party member scum, exploitative venture capitalists, Hamas, Israeli settlers and the soldiers who defend them, ISIS, Neocons, etc.

The list goes on and on.

The thing about sociopaths is that they're very good at adapting to the time and place in which they were born. Often times they become 'positive' yet extreme examples for how to get by in their respective societies.

stirnerism

Hardline Mechanism/Materialism as the civic culture, and a demonstrably super-effective police force.

Sociopaths are not sentient.

empathy is a spook mein property
t, stirner

Capitalism

This

>*schniff* why do you feel the need of shearshing for shuch a thing? Don't let yourself be reshtrained by *schniff* ideology

/thread

Anarcho capitalism

The smartest psychopaths in the world are apex predators.

low-level psychopaths prey on innocent victims.

High-level psychopaths prey on low-level psychopaths.

How do i level up?

What are your favorite books/documentaries/movies - feel free to present w/e you like regardless of way it is delivered.

there's a lot of psychopaths out there, they're nothing special. Something like 40% of normies

Sociopaths cannot function if they can't manipulate others.

Well I assumed that in an anarchy there would immediately form gangs and warlords, among whom the most forceful sociopaths would rise to power.

this socios use whatever spooks the normies around them seem to fall for

But if they took control it wouldn't be anarchy anymore, it's really the reason anarchy is unsustainable.

Crony capitalism

They don't need to form a government necessarily.

>capitalism
Fucking communists. Capitalism brings more prosperity to both the rich and the poor than any other economic model.

Anyways, egoist/individualist anarchism is the only correct answer, OP

All money-worshiping ideologies, i.e. all branches of Capitalism and Socialism.

The less abstract currency is and the more things supersede it, the harder it is for the things called Sociopaths to acquire capital and have power over humans.

One could even argue the slow removal of Monarchy was generally done by and for the Sociopath.

>egoist/individualist anarchism

No rule of law would mean certain death for most sociopaths, certainly all the violent ones.

maybe, the founder of a dynasty might have been a sociopath, but their kids will likely be neurotypicals

Libertarianism.

Quite the contrary, since they are more likely to kill non-sociopaths. Besides, how would they know you are a sociopath?

Generally speaking, most people that come into contact with the Sociopath, except women and complete autists, know what he is. The only thing keeping him alive is rule of law. Any kind of system based on negative liberty would lead to them being killed en masse.

Anarchism. No Gods no Masters. Nothing is stopping me from becoming a slaving, genocidal warlord a la Immortan Joe except for LARPing Ancom militas and similar faggots.

A system with a well regulated market.

That is, a system where you reward people for doing good things. So at least they do good things for the wrong reasons.

Unregulated markets often times have gaps where sociopaths get rewarded for doing bad things, and since they have no other inhibitions and there's a reason for them to do bad things, they do it.

"Market societies" and complex societies in general are susceptible to this. It's less about money itself, it's about abstracting away power and influence to control people you have no personal relation to.
Of course money is one of the most powerful abstractors.