Give me ONE good reason you need more than 4 cylinders amerifats

>need

You don't need. In fact, you probably only need 3.

The reason I have have 8 cylinders is because that's what a *wanted*, and I get what I want in America, unlike you yuropoors who don't know what freedom is like.

The AMG45 CLA is actually AWD, so that's even more embarrassing.

>torque dip

Ariel Atom

kit car
i
t

c
a
r

These.
Technically the FFR 818 does but it's a kit car.

Canada, Australia

It's not called the "Bill of Needs".

you're right, 4 is more than enough

>waaaa that doesn't count because I don't want you to be right
You said factory, and they are factory

both are nations that enjoy V8s or ridiculous things like road trains.

Why dooes anyone need a car that can go 0-60 under 4 seconds user?

What the fuck is a road train? A semi with multiple trailers?

yes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_train

6.2Liter supercharged, cunt

Alfa Romeo 4C does it in 4.2s
Evo FQ400 does it in 3.8s

no, they wouldn't be allowed in america if they were not kit cars because they are fucking F1 cars on the road.

it would be like saying the hayabusa is only 2 cylinders so logically you'll never need more than 2 cylinders on a car.

Why does anyone need a fast computer?
Why does anyone need a nice house?
Why does anybody need fancy food when you can live off Soylent and water?

Why don't we all just live like monks while were at it?

the golfs have you surrounded, run

>manufacturer benefits from producing and selling what consumer desires
>consumer benefits from buying and consuming what manufacturer produces

>europoors don't understand this

that's all capitalism is. If both parties didn't benefit, then the trade wouldn't happen (absent govenrment intervention). It's why America is so rich

Americans, not America.
a poor nation filled with rich people.

>I have no reasonable arguments

>need

>19/24 us mpg
>0-60mph under 5 seconds
>305 hp 345 lb-ft stock
>0.91+ g skidpad on good tires
>11.9" brake rotors

>cost less than a nissan versa

also
>removable t-top roof

do europoors even have t tops

kek

My single cylinder can do that

>you don't NEED this

spoken like a true cuck.

because even with forged internals your brz will shit itself under boost past 500hp, if it even makes it that far.

Meanwhile lsx, rb26, 2jz all happily laugh at that kind of boost

>you don't need this
This is why yurocucks should not be allowed on this board. It's about what I fucking WANT, not what I fucking NEED, but that's a concept that's beyond the average yuropoor.

...

Auto companies need it because I want it.

Give me one reason you NEED a car. Ohh whats that, you cant? Of course not, because other than food, water and shelter, you dont need anything.

something's gotta power your bus

many full sized buses uses diesel inline 4 engines, under forced induction of course.

This guy gets it.

Didn't a V4 win lemans?

To be reasonable is to deny your humanity

We are a species of "because.". The reasons arise in hindsight.

>well, actually, building a bigger tent than the chief one camp over might have had some advantages
>for one, everyone else in the camp went a size up since it would still be smaller than yours, chief
>for two, we can fit more people and stuff in fewer tents. great idea, chief!
>i just wanted the biggest tent. fuck the other tribe. if they start making bigger tents, we burn them to the ground.

When people buy faster cars, eventually everyone has faster cars as yesterday's premium becomes today's status quo, and the flow of traffic improves because most cars can get up to speed faster, zipper merge more efficiently, and so on

Same fag FRS 16 year old gay lover.

Aren't you too young to be browsing this site?

Suck my ass fuckboi

>eventually everyone has faster cars as yesterday's premium becomes today's status quo
where's my quad rotor Japan-muscle car?

Killed by regulations and bean counters.

Engineering is hard and takes a while

Being fast while conforming to useless emissions and safety regs is even harder

>meanwhile, a ship burning literal sludge is producing more smog than an entire city of cat-free muscle cars

Get a load of this pleb

How exactly does an engine go 60?

Any motorcycle that does 0-60 in under 4 seconds.

The answer was right here, you faggot:
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution FQ400
0-60mph in 3.8s

>need
Irrelevant. Why do Eurofriends let themselves be pushed about by ecoturds who consider 2.0l to be "high displacement"? Even more confusing is that European manufacturers are the ones hand-building monstrous aspirated V12 and W engines, but get stuck with 1.3l and 3cyl diesel boxes.

>from the factory
Also irrelevant. The Evo and STi come with less power than a (CL)A45 AMG, but with the difference in pricing between them and the Merc dumped into tuning the two will eat it alive.

To be fair the FQ model Evos aren't stock. Mitsu just extended the warranty to cover whatever Rampage did to them.

>Even more confusing is that European manufacturers are the ones hand-building monstrous aspirated V12 and W engines, but get stuck with 1.3l and 3cyl diesel boxes.
Because socialism. Wants are irrelevant, there's no reason to own anything more than a 1l shitbox that will get you from A to B. Want something more powerful, less economical and therefore BAD AND EVIL? Have fun paying out the fucking ass.

>FQ400
NOT STOCK
O
T

S
T
O
C
K

What difference does it make whether its stock or not. Mitsubishi honoured their warranty, which means any competent manufacturer could replicate it. In fact, it will become more and more common as engines continue to decrease in size. This literally proves that yes 4 cylinder cars can and will do sub-4s 0-60 times. Doesn't make them better, but they are still capable.

Towing a 53 foot trailer with a full payload is the first situation that comes to mind where 4 cylinders just probably won't do, no matter how many turbos you hook up to it.

Soft Cunt.

>sound
>tourque

2 already. get rekt fag.

You don't; I have 2 cylinders and do 0-60mph in 2.8 seconds.

What anime is that picture from?

hayabusa

I tow.

Checkmate cuck.

Literally any modern 4cyl motorcycle

>4 stroke
>3 cylinders
Thats why

V65 sabre

only a boxer fires one at a time
flat four and inline four are less staggered

Boku no Pico.

that's right, a real man only drives cars with at least 8 cylinders

and if you worry about your payments and fuel costs you're clearly a pussy and a cuck! who needs savings when you got a 500 hp beast?

yeah maybe these speed limits and traffic jams don't let express your manliness but one day you will finally attend a track day!

Because an i6 is smoother and has more torque.

>need

yeah, i dont need a V8 car. but i can, so fuck you

>Blaming Eurofriends for Nipcuck threads
I'm a Eurofriend and I support big fun hoonable engines.
I like my e36 6cyl, if I could afford it I'd stuff an s62 in it.

How will I take my wife and 2.5 children places? You faggots know OP/I was talking about cars.

I know that, but one fact I also know is that there aren't any stock production cars with a sub 4 second 0-60 time, this is to frustrate yurofags, which is working well. I own an NA 4cyl car myself.

>they are fucking F1 cars on the road
are you fucking kidding me? it's a civic engine mounted on some tubes and you think it's a F1 car lol

Well I want a Nissan Skyline.

Oops, banned cause domestics cant compete.

because soon there wont be any

its up to me to save what i can before its too late

>this guy hasnt seen a road registered f1 car

718 Boxster S (SportChrono/PDK)
Praga R1R
Zenos E10 R
Caterham Seven CSR

>Boxster, aka only "real" car of the list: 4.5 seconds, meanwhile a Boxster S without the flat 4 does it in 4.0 seconds, BTFO

>Boxster S without the flat 4
But that's wrong.
>the rest don't count because I said so
assmad

What the fuck are you on about you busriding cocksucker?

boxster s is a 2.5 4cyl now and it's faster than the old 6cyl :^)

Towing

No shit it's going to be faster. Porsche is the last of the uncucked German automakers and they wouldn't dare disappoint with something slower than its predecessor.

you people seem upset? maybe a drive in my 5.0 V10 will cheer you up?

You don't.

>my 5.0 V10
A used diesel Phaeton?

>313 PS (230 kW; 309 bhp)@3750, 750 N·m (553 lbf·ft)@2000
>750 N·m

Enough torque to give Mjet autism.

He already has autism, maybe it'll cure it

My 'vette has 4 cylinders

Yup, they don't need so they give all the money, women and children to refugees

Probably an e60 m5 since they cost like 19K now

The get of truth, yup.

I don't need more than 4 cylinders when there's a turbo on it, but an N/A 4 cylinder engine is for economy cars only. Notable exception being the S2000.

Because my V8 will probably last a lot longer with much, much less mechanical issues due to lower RPMs over its life span. Four cylinders are too high strung and can't produce as much power as a V8 without force induction and beefed up bottom ends.

Meanwhile, in the wonderful land of "cost" I can take the same money to get 400hp out of a coke bottle and make my behemoth of an engine double its power.

Also, trucks.

>Americans constantly complain how it's not fair that the rest of the world isn't starving
>then brag about how great their country is to try to make others jealous
And you wonder why you're despised....

Lamborghini: foreign
Ferrari: foreign
Bugatti: foreign

You yell at Americans for 6 and 8 cylinders but not foreign manufacturer for 10, 12, and 16 cylinder vehicles? Wtf is with this hypocrisy and misplaced hatred for Americans?

...

Why settle for 4 when you can have 8?
Why settle for 8 when you can have 12?

With 4 cylinders there isn't always a power stroke occurring like with 5 cylinders and up. Also you picked a horrid example of a 4 cylinder engine. The torque dip in boxer engines rivals the depth of the marina trench or your mother's vagina.