Thoughts?

some lady always drives one of those around where i live
its honestly one of the ugliest things ive seen

Convertibles always weight more than the equivalent coupe, and the GT-R coupe already weighs more than enough.

The new murano cross cabriolet is looking really angry.

WHY would you want to make such a pigfat heavy car.... even heavier?

>lap times are all that matters
sorry m8

gross

Looks like a giant scary person is hiding in the passenger side.

are you stupid?

it does not have an automatic, it has a dual clutch manual.

you better be shitposting

Good bait
And here, I will still bite:
>most supercars are "automatic"
>most supercars have a backup camera
>many many supercars are AWD
>GTR doesnt have 4 doors
>most supercars can make way more power and are limited

that said, it's definitely debatable whether it really is a supercar.
I think front engine doesn't disqualify it from being one though, like many people say.

100% spooked right now.

Faster in a straight line, faster around corners, faster around a track

how much more do you want?

it has a transmission that shifts automatically

it is an automatic

Looks like if Patrick from Spongebob was black and possessed

okay

the gtr's only selling point is that it is fast
and its biggest weakness is its weight

so we increase its weight and lower it's performance capabilities

but idiots would still buy a fat Nissan that can do 0-60 in 3.8s

Not a manually operated clutch, not a manual. Simple as that.

somebody took 400 pounds out of a GTR and it was slower.

Where are you getting 3.8s from?
The 2017 GTR has a 0-60 time of 2.7 seconds, what makes you think becoming a convertible would lower it by over a second?

Almost got me, nice bait.

where are you getting that someone removed 400 lbs from a gtr and it was slower?

motortrend.com/cars/nissan/gt-r/2014/2014-nissan-gt-r-japanese-spec-drive/

Nissan performance chief engineer Kazutoshi Mizuno

“For example, if we were to lighten the GT-R by 200 pounds, its 0-60 mph sprint time would fall from 2.7 seconds to around 3.3 seconds.

And its stopping distance (from 60 to zero) would stretch from 99 feet to around 115 feet,” explains Mizuno.

“The ratio we have now is the ideal one. Only this time, our modifications make it an even better car to drive!”

Matt Farah said 400, but he was wrong a bit and I believed him.

Oh, and on top of that

>Nissan engineers
>understanding Newton's first law
Pick one, and only one

Needs to be a folding hardtop for maximum pigfastness.
If they can get over two metric tons it's perfect.

>Nissan engineers
>Abiding by newton's first law
fixed

This thing abided Newton's laws just fine.

you are a moron

im glad im not the only one who saw that

Explain to me how something can accelerate faster if it is heavier.

F=m*a. F is constant (the engine does not change), so for a greater mass, acceleration will be slower.

Seems to me that Nissan engineers just failed physics class. Certainyl explains stuff like the Murano CC, and their LMP project.

and look at all the things it won
Grip you fucking mongoloid
I would say go back to high school physics class but it's more likely you haven't gotten there yet

More traction.

And that isn't even the fucking law, something can accelerate faster if it's heavier very simply:
If it's falling. (in gravity at least)

>and look at all the things it won
Pic related.

Grip? Static friction is dicated by a friction coefficient and weight. In automotive terms, this friction coefficient is determined by number of driven wheels, tire section and tire compound.

Sure, considering a non-sufficient friction coefficient, more weight would be better. However, a GT-R's friction coefficient is already ridiculously high, given it's AWD layout, wide tires (255 and 285 front and back, respecitvely), and decent rubber compound (BS Potenza's). It should have plenty of grip.

>AWD
>255/285 tires
>Decent rubber
It doesn't need traction.

>heavy objects accelerate faster than light objects in a vacuum
Please go take a physics class

Pls explain to me how Nissan engineers don't understand Newton's first law.

That's the joke m80, you said "This thing abided by Newton's laws just fine" and it didn't win shit
The joke is that the car is so fast that Nissan engineers broke the laws of physics

This doesnt feel like a car for summer beach cruises.

>It doesn't need traction
wew almost got me there

>heavy objects accelerate faster than light objects in a vacuum

>gravity
>vacuum
pick one
A true vacuum has nothing in it faggot

youtu.be/z0LzVoLiVCw

It can always use more traction. If you want to reduce weight you need more downforce.

Wot. If it's a joke it's a pretty shit one. What does Newton's first law have to do with the gtr being fast ???

The old one

>wake up
>still no hope to own a gt-r

Such is life.

M-m-muh manual driving experience!