ITT: characteristics of a car that immediately make you 180
>FWD
>4dr
>4 seats
>engine is mounted at the front
>engine is transverse
>automatic
>new and ripe for depreciation
>weighs more than 2000lbs
>has a ton of systems that detach you from the road like abs,traction control, """advanced""" powersteering
>higher than 30 inches off the ground
if your hooptie falls under any of these areas and there's literally no course of counterargument you can take other than being a comprising buffoon.
>I'm going to make this thread because I drive a miata
>I'm also retarded
The post.
>go to buy a new car
>only a V8 is avaliable
>miatas are MR
the only retard is you
You can't be serious
go be underage elsewhere.
>weighs more than 2000lbs
So, nearly every single car?
>mid or rear engined two seater that weighs under a ton
There are like 5 production cars ever made that fit that description and they're all old and slow as hell
>mfw the ecoboost radical achieves all of this
>this is what nu males think
sigh...
never said it had to be a production car bucko
>four seats
>never said it had to be a production car bucko
Didn't imply that you did, either. Try learning to read?
>hooptie
Actually, you did in fact imply that by quoting me, so shut your trap.
>Everyone who doesn't own the same make and model as I do is an idiot
Welp, the spirit of Veeky Forums seems alive and well
>picking a car with faults because muh snowflake mentality
jesus christ neck yourself
My car is 2100 pounds, has no driver assists, is rear wheel drive, 2 door, manual, and is front engine but has 50/50 weight distribution. Is this acceptable?
depends. what car?
fb rx7
>ecoboost
>radical
pick 1
Both, dumbass
>only special snowflakes can enjoy something that I don't
okay then
So you're a bus cuck, but only because no affordable RWD in Miami?
What possible car could fit this criteria? Even the 818 is too tall IIRC. Fuck the gt40 is too tall.
You have described an old F1 car.
Nothing is 30in or less tall
>Big gay touchscreen in dash
>Push button start
>Shit visibility
>Driver assist shit and backup camera
>Lots of buttons on the steering wheel
...
Bump
Calm down grandpa.
I think he's talking about ground clearance. Lifted trucks are not okay.
>I can't afford a new car so I get mad when I see other people driving them
>engine is longitudinal and slung out ahead of the front axle
Who ever thought this was a good idea?
...
>its an "my extremely specific niche sport is the only legitimate use for a motor vehicle" episode
What the fuck do you even drive?
>car exists
>ITT: characteristics of a car that immediately make you 180
u mean 360
there isn't really a single car that fits these
>sub 2000 lb
>NON TRANSVERSE
>NOT FRONT ENGINE
>NOT FWD
you want a longitudinal MR or RR that weighs less than 2000lbs.
so op drives an air cooled 911? even those are 2400+ lb
my civic hatch is right at 2000lb. but obviously its
>4 seats
>fwd
>50/50 weight distribution meme
exige with a V8 swap
Exige is heaver than 2000lbs. An atom v8 fits the bill
>all these autistic requirements
jesus, you guys.
the only thing i instantly walk away from is
>cvt's
It's ok, we all know you can't resist your cuck temptations to buy a turbo instead of actual power like the little faggot you are
Why is it so bad? How is it that you, an autistic NEET, knows better than countless billion dollar automakers who have been doing it for decades?
What do you think is good? Can you explain why other than some faggot telling you that 50/50 is shit because he's a salty faggot in a cuck-mobile?
So you only drive old MR2s lmao
Wow OP we should strive to emulate you
50/50 isn't ideal for performance, but marketing teams hammer it as the pinnacle of good chassis design for obvious reasons
Rear bias is god tier
50 50 is just "easy" for the driver because it's evenly balanced
>trying to defend MacPherson Strut
>trying to defend Haldex
>trying to defend the rampant orange peel
>trying to defend the shift to FWD
>trying to defend crossovers
>trying to defend 4-door coupes
>trying to defend "clean diesel"
>trying to defend a gradual shift to torsion bar rear suspension
>defending the BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer
I could go on all night
Did you seriously type this post out and think "yes, this actually makes sense" before submitting it
4 door coupés have existed for decades dumb amerishart
So has homosex but that doesn't make it okay.
Here you go
>car has two drummers
Bump
torsion bar suspension is fine. perhaps you mean torsion beam?