Why is Otto van Bismarck the most based motherfucker throughout history?

Why is Otto van Bismarck the most based motherfucker throughout history?

He was cool.

He made the classic mistake of failing to capitalize on early successes to build political institutions.

Germany couldn't operate as a state without him, and eventually they didn't have him.

>Most based
Are you even using your brain?

Just because you can't appreciate quality historical figures doesn't mean you have to be rude

Hey there im just passing through

>Caesar not quality
Honestly kill yourself. Every great leader since Caesar has based themselves off of him and Alexander

>van

>finally unite the Germanic peoples under one fag
>they disunite almost immediately after your death because some autist wanted a war

Being Bismarck is suffering.

Excuse me

...

...

Excuse me, faggot, I do believe I am the most based here.

>a
>fucking
>potato

>a
>fucking
>corsican

>Wellington
>based

Oh boy.

hmmm, don't recall the Wellington Era of Europe :^)

Also
>most famous for a battle in which his troops meant to lose

I laugh at you all. Filthy peasants. I was the one who defeated Napoleon, I was the one who ended the French aggressor, I was the one who ended up sending that dreaded Corsican to his grave in St. Helena.

And you all mock me, HAH! I was the best, and you know it too.

At Waterloo, Blucher was simply there for auxiliary support, I swear!

Mao was the basest, before he went full retard with his cultural revolution of course.

How on earth did that motherfucker defeat the KMT?

Duke of Wellington himself conceded that Napoleon was the greatest general ever.

Kai-Shek was just that much worse, and the KMT was just that much more disorganized.