Hi Veeky Forums i am from /pol/ and since this is a /pol/ colony with smarter people than /pol/ self I will ask my...

Take your "free speech" elsewhere.

This is not /pol/ with dates, read the sticky.

First of all about your question: possibly, no because the genes could have spread to other continents easily though I'm not sure.
And yes /pol/ is like that. I don't even know why they don't close /pol/ already. There is no way you're going to get intelligent discussion on a high traffic imageboard for socially reclusive people.

Homo sapiens sapiens appeared in East Africa around 200,000 years ago. The oldest individuals found left their marks in the Omo remains 195,000 years ago.

When modern humans reached the Near East 125,000 years ago, evidence suggests they retreated back to Africa, as their settlements were replaced by Neanderthals. It is now believed that the first modern humans to spread east across Asia left Africa about 75,000 years ago across the Bab el Mandib connecting Ethiopia and Yemen.

From the Near East, some of these people went east to South Asia by 50,000 years ago, and on to Australia by 46,000 years ago at the latest, when for the first time H. sapiens reached territory never reached by H. erectus. H. sapiens reached Europe around 43,000 years ago, eventually replacing the Neanderthal population by 40,000 years ago. East Asia was reached by 30,000 years ago.

There is evidence from mitochondrial DNA that modern humans have passed through at least one genetic bottleneck, in which genome diversity was drastically reduced. Henry Harpending has proposed that humans spread from a geographically restricted area about 100,000 years ago, the passage through the geographic bottleneck and then with a dramatic growth amongst geographically dispersed populations about 50,000 years ago, beginning first in Africa and thence spreading elsewhere. Climatological and geological evidence suggests evidence for the bottleneck.

The explosion of Lake Toba created a 1,000 year cold period, as a result of the largest volcanic eruption of the Quaternary, potentially reducing human populations to a few tropical refugia. It has been estimated that as few as 15,000 humans survived.

In such circumstances genetic drift and founder effects would have been maximized leading to a rapid racial differentiation after that date.

The greater diversity amongst African genomes may be in part due to the greater prevalence of African refugia during the Toba incident.

Why welcome my fellow /pol/lack. It's been nice here in the colony since you left us many years ago. We're growing everyday. I sure miss /pol/ thought. Our home is your home, you'll always be welcome here.

Bumping for fellow /pol/lack

At least post the Veeky Forums-friendly version of that meme, OP.

Remove /pol/

Fuck off /pol/ack, we're full.

Stop bullying /pol/

You don't bully /pol/

/pol/ bullies you

>Many things have been said about me which are wrong, and which white and black persons here, who stood by me through the war, can contradict. I have been in the heat of battle when colored men, asked me to protect them. I have placed myself between them and the bullets of my men, and told them they should be kept unharmed. Go to work, be industrious, live honestly and act truly, and when you are oppressed I'll come to your relief.
what did Nathan Bedford Forrest mean by this

>Fake Ben garrison
It's amazing what the Internet persona he has and who he actually is.

Probably refuting the accusations that he was head of the Ku Klux Klan (William T. Sherman, whom Forrest had foiled the plans of countless times, did not find enough evidence to charge him with being member of the Klan, let alone it's leader).

Virtually all anecdotal "evidence" of Forrest's being Imperial Wizard was published after his death and with the blessings of his grandson, who was a member of the Second Klan.

youwereliedtoabout.com/nbf.htm

Ben Garrison's basically turning into /pol/ though because of the Trump Train.

I'm guessing Veeky Forums is America then if we aren't on the map. And that would make Canada /trash/, since their posters are truly trashy.

>/pol/ colony
Isn't Marx the majority of Veeky Forumstorians' waifu?

>/pol/ is nothing like that
I dare you to make a hillary thread and not called get called a shill or even mention in passing your middle eastern without being called a mudslime. Keep lying to yourself, "freedom of speech" isn't just what you like to hear Hans. You made the argument yourself
>disagree? hurr durr sure thing Ahmed

No. Veeky Forums just tends to get annoyed at blatant shitposting about Marx because, you know, he's a historical figure.

Is there a 'before Veeky Forums, after Veeky Forums', image?

We would have been better off.
Africa with vast resources not being wasted by niggers.

>I was going to ask a Veeky Forums question on /pol/ but since /pol/ is full of retards I'm going to ask it on Veeky Forums
You belong with the retards

There should be. It should literally be the inverse of before /pol/.

Free speech doesn't mean you have to act like a faggot 24/ 7

Fixed btw

Don't be mean to our guest, he is an inhabitant of the chans as well as our board. Treat other channers with respect, lefties.

I'll treat him with respect if he treats my board with respect. He can start by making on-topic threads.

He has to integrate into board culture and follow the rules. No /pol/ with dates

the no /pol/ with dates rule failed epically

you know im right

based uniter

This isn't about being lefty, it's about standing up for our board culture.

/pol/ are the globalists of Veeky Forums. They want to be able to go onto any board, and see the same threads, and see the same opinions regurgitated, and be able to act as if they haven't even left their home board.

Well no. As a wise man once said "You have to go back."

cringed

amen

Made one for you, senpai.

>literally an upvote

Despite all evidence to the contrary.

This.

>literally an upvote

>dude people agree with this man

Get the fuck off this board, you cock sucking stormnigger.

youtube.com/watch?v=vg0Tmydj29M
so it begins, the great war of our times

>they want to go to any board
>see the same threads
>see the same opinions regurgitated
>be able to act as if they haven't even left their home board

/pol/ is a contingent of people with different opinions, this isn't exactly the norm of what most of them do.

I will say that the fascist ones tend to do things like that but the majority doesn't.

>/pol/ being one person

No.

As I said before treat them with respect, you're all literally shitting on innocents who have done nothing to ruin this board.

kek, only relevant comment is ignored

> you're all literally shitting on innocents who have done nothing to ruin this board.
He made an offtopic thread, he's not innocent. If I start spamming my porn folder in this thread, are you going to defend me against people who shit on the innocent who have done nothing to ruin this board, or will you want to take that gross fetish shit away.

You don't even know what you are talking about, also this is anthropology not history.

Also /pol/niggers leave, bunch of retarded faggots. Not even interested in history just fixated on MUH BLACKS and MUH LEFTISTS. Go back to your containment board.

>OP asks a question
>sperg out because he started off with a sentence that triggered you
>he even complimented you by saying Veeky Forums was smarter than /pol/
autism

>no TRUE /pol/fuck would take part in this obviously destructive behavior
>MOST /pol/autists are perfectly well-meaning posters not looking to stir up shit
>/pol/ isn't one person, how could you POSSIBLY blame every /pol/nigger for the actions of a few?

Your post is a rhetorical disaster area.

His subject, I'm afraid, wasn't offtopic. Indeed, he was asking about the prehistoric origins of man and yes, you did shit on him only because he said he was from /pol/.

He is innocent as I judge him correctly to be. Your argument is invalid. As for spamming a porn folder, that belongs to /b/ or /trash/.

Human evolution is literally prehistory, it's off topic.

the only offtopic shit is the Veeky Forums meta discussion going on ITT

take that shit to /qa/ butthurt fags

>His subject, I'm afraid, wasn't offtopic

Anthropology is not history. Time period he is referring to is literally known as "Pre-History"

kek

>your post is a rhetorical disaster area

Fuck off, lad.

We have threads about prehistory all the time. The only rule is that you can't post anything past 25 years ago.

>hey guys Veeky Forums is /pol/ colony you belong to us

>btw lets talk about niggers n shiet

did /pol/ touch you as a kid

We are not a /pol colony. Please take all the far-right bullcrap you believe in with you and never comeback. You are unwelcomed.
About your question: No. A skin pigment mutation would sooner or later appear and natural selection.

You seem to forget that we don't take kindly to faggots who believe in """race realism""" who come from a board which blatantly denies historical evidence, and furthermore consist of low iq individuals who spew their ideology on every single fucking board.

They are literally the SJWS of Veeky Forums. They can't take a joke, handle the bantz, and the second you criticse their ideology, they sperg out like a 5 year old on crack, and start shitting all over the place with buzzwords, outdated information and conspiracy theory.

It's not that I don't mind right-wing politics, or left wing politics for that matter, I simply just don't like faggots who have to ruin every single thread that may have to do with egypt, world war II, or any other form of African history.

They do it on /tv/, on /int/ and on nearly every single fucking board.

They cannot keep to themselves, and they contribute nothing to those boards, or this one.

They try to """"red pill"""" us, but wind up getting BTFO by ACTUAL evidence, and when they are beat, they call your evidence bullshit, and reject it entirely.

And it's bad enough that it's spreading on Veeky Forums, but it's spreading on facebook, and almost every other social media site.

We are fed up with your autism, we are fed up with your bullshit conspiracies, we are fed up with stormniggers.

>>/pol/

Go back to your containment board and never come back.

tl:dr

nice paragraph fag

>prehistory is not history

If it's not history than how come it has the word 'history' in it?

You expect me to believe that 'pre-history' a subject pertaining to the time period devoted to before written history, or should I say past history, is not history?

What do you think history is, lad?

his·to·ry
ˈhist(ə)rē/Submit
noun
1.
the study of past events, particularly in human affairs.

I rest my case.

Why should I take him seriously when he doesn't even know where to post his questions

tl; dr, suck a fat jewish cock stormfags. You're worthless.

lol butthurt

So much this

>/pol/ likes free speech
>go on 8/pol/
>get banned for literally anything

lol butthurt

>If it's not history than how come it has the word 'history' in it?
I see! Well in that case he must also be asking a question about a member of the Conservative Party of Great Britain, because it has the word 'Tory' in it, right?

triggered?

so /pol/ spergs out before getting rekt and then pupated by reddit ?

>being this butthurt over an anime imageboard

You really made me think with how the way you just claim they deny historical evidence and didnt provide evidence yourself of this.

Really made me think.

Nice buzzwords, now go on and get mad at multiracial couples while we try to discuss history on this board, I got a feeling you would like that much more.

Well, Tories are conservatives, I don't quite understand what you're trying to tell me here, sir.

u mad

...Yes. Literally that.

Right, Tories are conservatives.

And Prehistories contains the word Tories.
And Prehistory contains the word Tory.

If it's not about a tory, than how come it has the word 'tory' in it?

who's to say this hasn't already happened ?

You cannot study past events of humans in a historical context if there are no written records you moron. That's why pre-history is speciality of anthropologists and not historians. Historians can deduce events from archaeological evidence and remains of ancient civilisations, not whether Africans would have starved to death while neanderthals were still alive.

The events OP asked "Could have niggers went extinct?" is entirely anthropology. Fuck off with this nigger shit before recorded history. It's literally PRE-history

no u

please stop shitting up the catalog with these shitty meta threads take this shit to /qa/ you fucking fags

ahhhh i do enjoy the daily dose of triggered redditors on this board

Yup

I don't think you read the meme that he provided.

They claim that the Crusaders were GUD BOI WHO DINDU NUFFIN

>Heh look at those triggered redditors

>Gets triggered over black people, television shows and video games.

>Gets triggered over any left wing policy

HA

But that's not a word, that was simply a fragment of a word you sampled out of what we were previously chatting about.

If you're going to change subtopics, I have no reason to argue with you any further.

>You cannot study past events of humans in a historical context if there are no written records

Actually you can, that's what anthropology is. It literally means, 'human study', since you're studying about humans wouldn't you also be learning about their history in the field of anthropology?

nothing wrong with crusaders killing orthodox LARPers, sandniggers and snowniggers.

*upvotes*
agreed fellow redditor

upv- i mean this

>But that's not a word, that was simply a fragment of a word
Are you saying Tory isn't a word?

Depends on how you're using it, in this case you're using it as a fragment and therefore it is not a whole word, and can't be a word.

go back to shitting up /v/ and shilling trump while at the same time talking about how everyone who disagrees with you is a shill