This is the original social justice textbook

This is the original social justice textbook

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vereniging_Martijn
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

That would be the Constitution.

The constitution deserves more respect in the political and legislative sphere, but The Bible:

>Tells the story of an oppressed slave race in the first testament and portrays the asymmetric relationship between them and their oppressors who they outsmart and escape with God's blessing
>Tells the story of God taking human form in the second testament and educating the ignorant on social justice issues

If you mean advocating for literal social justice, that is saying caring for the widows and orphans and the poor is part of being moral, and those who trample on them are wicked, then yes, social justice is a large them. If you mean "social justice" as in the modernist ideology that says transsexualism should be exalted and women should be proud of being harlots, and that if you're skin color is white, you should feel ashamed, then no, it's not a textbook of that at all, because the Bible is a core book of an ancient system of thought, whereas that system of thought is wholly modernist.

Modern tumblr social justice is literally the continuation of Christian morality.

Caring for transpeople is no different from Christ's embrace of beggars, prostitutes, and lepers.

Jesus protected a woman who actually cheated on her husband from being slut-shamed.

>Jesus protected a woman who actually cheated on her husband from being slut-shamed.
Then Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are your accusers? Has no one condemned you?” 11 “No one, Lord.” she answered. “Neither do I condemn you. Jesus declared. “Now” go and sin no more.

The "sin no more" part if what you've conveniently left out. Homosexuals, sluts, etc. want everyone to dignify their degeneracy. Big difference.

What in the New Testament says homosexual or promiscuous heterosexual sex are sinful?

Her sin was that she fucked around while being married.

There is literally nothing wrong with homosexuality, aside from "muh fee-fees are hurt!"

You're not doing anything but repeating Nietzsche, which historians today agree shouldn't be taken seriously as an historical analysis. He's a fine philosopher, but don't actually use his account as a source of truth, Nietzsche himself didn't even pretend to talk about truth in some objective way, he just related *his* truth, which is like how Aryans being Hyperborean-Atlanteans is "Evola's truth", not intended as "the truth" in some higher sense. Nietzsche framed his thought with a poetic account of history to make it some larger struggle, using him as an historian is like using Shakespeare as an historian.

Try 1 Corinthians 6:9 for starters

youtube.com/watch?v=jjPQ_jVlEnQ

The Netherlands has the same wide range of views and prejudices among it's people as any other Western country.

It's fairly typical of dumbasses like that to try and argue with a bit of national stereotyping and it's fairly typical of dumbasses like you to think that's a good point.

>The Netherlands has the same wide range of views and prejudices among it's people as any other Western country.

martijn pls

I'm not clear what the point of this post is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vereniging_Martijn

martijn is a pedophila advocacy group which was protected by the dutch gov't which is evidence that dutch views on sexuality are not representative of the west

>martijn is a pedophila advocacy group which was protected by the dutch gov't which is evidence that dutch views on sexuality are not representative of the west

In what way?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

well we know that the dutch are extremely less religious than americans and we both know religious people are more likely to have a low view of homosexuality

although i can concede that mainstream american culture has deteriorated significantly over the obama years

>2nd pic on the bottom
There is nothing wrong with loving Molly.

good goy

*Tips fedora*

No it's just a book about God that got retconned into talking about the demon baal (the lord) and his son.

Original text may have had a teacher that kinda would have been called the christ maybe, but certainly the ways of the antichrist are rising from the abyss, having his wounded image worshipped in the place of God in the temple and even call himself god, which is what jesus did.