/wtg/ - War Thunder General

What brings you to Ohio friend?

having to resize all of my pictures down from 60MBs

these were taken back in may. I just wanted to see planes and there's no good plon museum in kentucky.

...

Did the BIGNESS of this thing put you in awe like it did me?

...

I could not get a full picture of it so I simply left it as is.

...

from the footage I've seen it looks like the New Update will take at least another two or three weeks.

The Maps and Vehicles look far from finished. Cockpits too.

just realized my image program is misjudging the size of my jpgs for this thread

no it wont
the roleld out the tasks for CBT already same with forum titles and the trailer
patch will be between monday and thursday next week

cockpits are finished they are literally only a camera inside the 3d model with instruments added and they already stated that like 20 times

so when is gaijin going to unlock the entire jap tree

Shuriken bullshit literally starts tomorrow

...

...

probs a month after 1.65 launch

...

can a yak-3 vk 107 outrun a spitshitter mk 22/24 in level flight at sea level?

forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/331379-165-rumor-round-up-and-discussion/&do=findComment&comment=6640447

is that the US air force museum in ohio? I've been there before

wasn't it like 3 months with bong tonks?

...

Su-7 when? Rocket pods when?

i dont remember desu i thought it was 1 week per tier
i always had the preorder packs so i dont know how long it was

...

Why is the spaghetti .50 cal so horrendous

>rocket pods could be the one thing to save slav CAS
>"xD u don geddem"
every time

They did a couple new tanks a week at first, then opened the floodgates when they were done with tier 3

that's a Mig-17, user

Because the ammunition/barrel is shorter and because there's only two of them.

Two M2s wouldn't be the most potent armanent either.

...

>Tigershitters so shit that I bounce their Kw36 in my T-V

You're absolutely right. My mistake.

>tfw no kraut F-84F

>test fly one of the premium griffon shitfires
>fucking maintain 20+m/s of climb all the way to here
holy fuck i thought it was a joke that teebs were handheld but what the fuck

>be burger
>climb on jap map
>get no kills
just

just Sideclimb

...

>tfw no kraut canberra

>shoot bombers on the engines and wings
>it does fuck all for me
>they just soak up cannons and machine guns like nobodies business
>I only get bombers to die when their guns finally set me on fire
why is this happening please help this is suffering

stop tailsitting you shitter

even if I'm not tailsitting the same shit always happens

take your time and make several approaches and only shoot at one wing the farther out to the tip the more it will fuck his ability to fly

>tfw no blue impulse F40 Sabre

??

TEEBS BTFO
DAT CAPTCHA

>pilot loses control
>only then does the aircraft actually fly like you want it to
>manage to beat two yaks like this
makes sense

I'd love to see the russian results

question is incredibly vague...

in what, finances? resources? human cost? infrastructure? kills?

also what they paid or what damage they did? strategic value? political influence/actions?

shit senpai, the results vary depending on what you look at

>Question is incredbly vague
are you fucking stupid? The question is straightforward, go back to Londonistan you british pesent, dont you have some royal cock and 90 year old vagina to suck and suck the shit from?

>british education

>question is incredibly vague
it's not at all. It would be the sum of all of those things
Do you happen to be a brit yourself or something?

Tbh everyone who replies USA is stupid. Everyone knows Italy did the most to keep Germany from winning.

>british

niggers assuming where I am from based off the fact I ask questions

heres a simple question: US or USSR?

did the US pay more by their industry or did the US pay more in the human cost?

which one was more important to winning the war? which one was more decisive in defeating the germans or rather, which one of these two would have let the germans win by not contributing their part against the germans?

damage control

How dense are you?
You're trying to break up a simple question.
Who contributed the most?
That's it. That's all.

...

sure, dismiss points with shit like this, can't expect people to actually read posts in this thread.

ok so what do you mean by contribution again? fucking define what that is. US wins by money USSR wins by lives lost and lives taken

...

The question is who contributed more
So you have to decide which of those categories was more important and contributed more.
That's it.
Stop trying to break the question up into categories.

>USSR wins by lives lost
Sending tundra monkeys off to die without proper materiel didn't do the slavs any good. They won by running away until it got really cold.

and england wins by the amount of women getting fucked by foreign GIs on leave

what's the point?

thats precisely what I am asking, which of those two facets of the war was more critical, did US industry save the allies or did the eastern front's sheer death toll win, and in the case of the USSR, can US support through lend lease be considered critical enough that had it not been there the soviets would have lost?

>russia probably did the most work
>not once is it the top answer

p sure that's france, m8

What? Are you just turning the question into a paragraph to act smart?
And in your first post you said the results vary depending on what you look at.
You aren't supposed to look at certain things. The question is extreme straight forward. WHO CONTRIBUTED THE MOST TO THE VICTORY

outside of cucked british men I doubt anyone gave a shit, by most accounts US and Canadian troops stationed in the UK were fairly welcomed, given they are all culturally similar and everything.

I can imagine some local papers bawwing about preserving morals, but occurrences of sex rose in most allied countries during the war

TEEBS BTFO

shit son so if it is so straight forward riddle me this then, US or soviets?

fuck man save historians decades of debates in this thread, aw man it was so easy whew, why the fuck did people waste research grants on historians anyways because thank fuck some retards on Veeky Forums can solve it faster

reminder to report and ignore teeb spitshitters

I think I'm finally getting good with the P-38L

My last problem is just rounds going right through planes and getting "hit)" instead of actual damage

>inb4 merely pretending

What? What are you even talking about senpai

>there are people who unironically can't figure out the number of countries who used Shermans in WWII vs the number who used Churchills or T-34s

>there are people who think "soldiers only" is how armies operate, supply and logistics be damned

Wait for next patch, its gonna unfuck the DMs

>implying the US didn't have the best supply and logistics of the war

the fuck are you asking then, were the soviets likely to survive without US assistance? totally capable of pushing back the germans singlehandedly no problemo senpai

more that thanks to logistics and supply granted through lend lease the war had fewer allied casualties and the war ended sooner, whether or not it is enough to say lend lease won the war however is a hotly debated topic

it must be hard being this fucking stupid

>totally capable of pushing back the germans singlehandedly no problemo senpai
At what extra cost, though? Not to mention the slavs were such enormous pansies they signed an NAP with Japan rather than fighting a two-front war like ever single other major power of the war.

This whole thing was just pointing out how teebs are delusional.
You said results vary based on what sections you look at
We said we are looking at the whole thing not sections
Then you said:?????

Didn't they invade Manchuria towards the end?

>rather than fighting a two-front war like ever single other major power of the war.

Like the single other who barely fought an entire two front war until 1944?

>the a-10 is just a jet powered hs 129/he 219
really makes you think

not an argument

I guess you didn't catch the sarcasm, also seems people believe in their heart of hearts there is a clear answer to whether it was the US or the soviets who contributed more, given the fact we pretty much have no clue if the soviets could survive without lend lease, and yet their claim to the highest number of krauts killed is their prime argument for being the mvp of ww2

was curious why teebs are being brought up in what should clearly be US/USSR debate, also because the definition of contribute encompasses both participation and financial assistance, so shit gets blurry and yes, needs clarification.

more like a Ju-87 ackshually

>US had Japan on their back foot just months after Pearl
>Commonwealth was very tied up helping British Raj and Australia

Disease and hypothermia doesn't count as a kill, desu, just a death.

Did you even fucking look at the graph????.?...?

they sent about 1million men into manchuria post double nukes, gave the area japan industrialized/modernized to mao, so in essense japan losing manchuria gave the communists china as mao had a resource rich industrialized base of operations.

should the US have gone to war with the USSR after ww2?

so this is the power of teeb autism

russians take credit anyways, gl trying to convince them otherwise.

of what, a public's opinions? who gives a fuck about them? do they learn this shit properly? hell no. those results at best reflect what they learned, which is generally shit.

UK believes they won the war, because the BoB is so fucking glorified there can you even imagine them thinking otherwise?