So people are all mass circlejerking electric cars because they're supposedly cleaner or more efficient than normal gas...

So people are all mass circlejerking electric cars because they're supposedly cleaner or more efficient than normal gas burning cars, right? My problem with this is that the electricity still has to come from somewhere, so you're still expending energy to push the pistons and make the car move.

Why hasn't anyone done work towards making a car that doesn't need energy to move? All you would have to do is open the throttle and it would go - no need to charge up the car or pump it full of gas. A car that didn't need energy to move would be way better for the environment than pumping oil or strip mining minerals for batteries.

Electricity is not the clean energy, but a readily accessible alternative energy, while oil maybe will not gonna run out in our live time, but extraction will be harder and more expensive. Also for countries like Japan and China, also some European countries, those have to import oil to satisfy domestic needs, electricity is an better alternative choice since there are more ways to generate electricity, if more and more of their citizens turned to electric cars, oil can be saved for more strategic use.
Also, the environmental impact of generating electricity will be hugely depend on the method, country with more percentage of nuclear power plant will likely be cleaner running electric cars than countries with coal burning power

>Why hasn't anyone done work towards making a car that doesn't need energy to move?
I see you failed grade 4 science class

most electricity comes from dams. Soooo in a way its made by gravity. Thats about as clean as it gets.


also energy is required to do work...so you have to have energy to move a car on level or uphill roads.

>most electricity comes from dams
Depends on where you live. Regardless we need more nuclear power to meet rising energy demands

>he thinks electric cars have pistons

>expending energy to push the pistons and make the car move

0/10 didn't take the bait

>Also for countries like Japan and China, also some European countries

You forgot thr USA, it's 70% self relient for oil, that would be like getting 70% of the oxygen you need to live.

>most electricity comes from dams.
Where? In the USA Coal is the majority of electricity production, in northen Europe it's gas.
>most electricity comes from dams.

>My problem with this is that the electricity
>still expending energy to push the pistons and make the car move

This has got to be bait. Nobody on Veeky Forums could actually be this retarded.

>car that moves without energy
So did you fail junior-high physics, or just skip it?

Everybody on Veeky Forums is this retarded

I think he means pushing a piston somewhere in a power plant to make the electricity for the car

>and make the car move
Nah, it's bait

Except there aren't any pistons in a power plant either. Coal, gas, hydro and nuclear all use turbines.

>thing that moves without energy

KILL YOURSELF

>Flooding entire areas and running a nice river is clean

>Nobody on Veeky Forums could actually be this retarded.
The IQ delta between Veeky Forums in general and OP's post is less than you would imagine.

>In the USA Coal is the majority of electricity production
The last time the US DOE published a summary Coal and Natural Gas were tied for electricity power production. But more Nat Gas powered electric plants are scheduled to come online, while Coal plants are being decommissioned. Natural Gas for the win, unless the Trump Administration mandates coal powered airplanes.

Our education system failed you.

>nuclear
>clean

Buying radioactive waste under a mountain is not clean... And no, you can't just "keep reusing" it infinitely.

The only people looking to buy nucular wast want to make a dirty bomb.

What about fast breeder reactors friend?

>in northen Europe it's gas.
Except for a few places like Norway or Scotland where things like Hydro or Geothermal make up the majority,

"Renewable electricity generation in Scotland was 21,983 GWh in 2015, up 15.2% on 2014.This is equivalent to 57.7 per cent of Scotland's total electricity consumption in 2015"

"Norway has around 3 power plants burning natural gas, depending on how they are counted : Mongstad 280 MW CHP, Kårsto 420MW (closed) and Tjeldbergodden 150MW (unused). They are rarely used, as hydropower is usually cheaper."

Too bad nobody uses them...

what is this, fallout 1?

Nigga I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT I JUST DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR GAS

Fuck the emissions stuff, you're going to fuck everything up by producing the batteries anyway

Don't forget about the bunker oil burning ships that are needed so ship the raw materials around the world 50 times.