It's over stang fags, you are lower than a fucking twingo

It's over stang fags, you are lower than a fucking twingo.

Other urls found in this thread:

euroncap.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

meanwhile in the US it gets 5 stars across the board

lame shitposting breh step it up

>wren-alt

>expecting any level of crash protection out of a foxbody
They were designed decades before crash tests were even a thing, of course it's gonna have a terrible result.

>Low stats because it's a baby grinder and doesn't have fun limiters
>Implying muscle car enthusiasts give a fuck about some Eurofag safety shit

Yes I'm mad

Burger damage control
Go jerk off to cuck porn ameritard

>w-who cares about it?

Why is this becoming the typical american reply when they aren't good at something?
And btw, the "fun limiters" only affect the last value.

where did you find those stats?

euroncap.com/

Shows you how shit the US "safety standard" is.

they are told that they are the best at everything, everyone is a winner etc. for their whole lives

Twingos have a history of being pretty safe cars for their time and size though.

What if I'm not an idiot and know how to drive?

Someone else will take the role of idiot that smashes into you head-on.

Only because we don't have Twingos in the US.

What site is this?

Is that a Volvo?

>you are lower than a fucking twingo.
That's a pretty high standard, user. I honestly can't think of a single car superior to the twingo.

this

twingo is GOAT

>Both hands on wheel
>Over reactive turning
This nigga would die in meer seconds in a fwd trying that shit.

FFS

A fucking twingo can't get going fast enough to do any damage.

But the tests are conducted at the same speed 64km/hr the twingo will do 165.

>>Both hands on wheel
I know nothing about fwd what did he mean by this?

Didn't the tests show the rear occupants wouldn't have died?

If a car with a 2 star rating means the rear passengers walk away with bruising, and overvalues electric nanny shit, then what is the point of even having a safety rating?

Making sure the driver and the front passenger doesn't die.
The rating does not evaluate any features of the car. It just looks at how the occupants of the car would fare in an accident and the Mustang crumpled like a 90s Kia.

>mustang fags have to crash in order to risk their life
>chevvy owners literally just have to put keys in the ignition
lmao, keep trying to deflect, ass mad gmfags

Why is it the end of the world if a car isn't a perfect safety cage? The safety ratings and tests are published info. You know what you're buying. You know there's no such thing as free lunch. You can't get amazing safety, power, handling, visibility, and luxury all in one package for $30k or less.

What's next

>OMG MOTORCYCLES ARE DANGEROUS
>BIKEKEKS BTFO ENJOY RISKING YOUR WORTHLESS NERD LIVES

low IQ consumers need something easy to understand like gold stars

a bunch of words just doesn't fly

>two star, goyim
>five star, goyim
>which is better?

People have been making fun of bikers for tens of years now for putting their lives on the line every day just because they are adrenaline junkies and love having a vibrator on their crotch.
Suddenly when everybody starts making fun of Mustangs for being less safe than a 1989 VW Polo, you get butthurt as fuck.

source

Ooh I can feel the heat from that burn over here.

It had nothing to do with the crash, no active lane keeping/braking control, terrible pedestrian test gave it 2 star

Bikes have certain practical advantages conferred by their size, height, and suspension travel when not gimped by moronic regulators

In the vast majority of the world, they're congestion busters that can hop a curb and park on the sidewalk