Hadiths

Why are Hadiths considered so important? Mohammad was supposed to be just a man, and all men are fallible. The Koran is supposed to be the Word of God, shouldn't that be the only thing that matters? Why should sayings by Mohammad carry such great weight if they aren't in the Koran?

because the direct word of god says that muhammad is a "beautiful example to humanity" and similar things, so even if it isn't the word of God, if muhammad said it or did it then it is good for you to do it.

and yes he both practices and condones child marriage and paedophilia

Does it say that he is a perfect example? I know semantics, but beautiful can still be flawed.

It is a somewhat gray area, most scholars agree that following the Sahhih (Confirmed) Hadiths is a good thing. This is because although Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) isn't worshipped or idolised, his actions and words are still highly respected - so imitating his actions and considered following the Sunnah (his way of doing things) can only be a good thing according to scholars.

Do these same scholars recognize that Muhammad lived in a time and place very different from our current time, and as such some of the practices he espoused are not morally justifiable by modern standards?

>tl;dr ITS 2016!!!

So how many innocent Jews have you decapitated?

>Jews
>Innocent

Mohammad fucked a 9 year old girl

And wanted to fuck a 1 year old girl.

Which, in the religion of pedophiles, is okay only if you marry the 1 year old.

The hadiths are great


Sahih al-Bukhari Book 6 Hadith 9:

Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:

Once Allah's Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Apostle ?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion."

It gets a bit tricky there, basically everything is more or less open to interpretation in the Hadith so different scholars an schools of thoughts deal with it differently, but anything in the Quran is considered right regardless of time.

The hadiths appeared at a time where spirituality was tied up in one's spiritual teacher and communal leader. Before the mid-8th century the idea of Sunnah didn't particularly mean Muhammad'd life and actions but the righteous justice of one's predecessors, and in the case of the caliphs which initially saw itself as an office that had come to replace prophethood itself as the one true authority in the world this meant the preceding caliphs, specifically the Umayyad family.

However, there was dissent in the form of revolts for the Alid/Abbasid houses which claimed descent from Muhammad, and from a growing class of scholar-bureaucrats who followed teachers who traced their spiritual authority to Muhammad. Both were attempts to circumvent the authoritative claims of the Umayyads by tracing their preferred spiritual leadership through blood or through sunnah to a prophet who began to grow in importance.

The Hadith are the result of the latter group, who came to be known as Sunni, to create a Sunnah for their various schools of thought through the edited collections of stories and anecdotes about Muhammad and those of the first two Muslim generations deemed worthy and righteous, and which exploded in popularity in the previous era as a wave of converts were hungry for explanation and insight into the Quran.

>"hey guys I'm a beautiful example to humanity"
>"shut up muhammad"
>"guys, look it's even written here!"
>"you totally wrote that down yourself muhammad"
>"no, god did, I swear"

lmao

So why don't more people just become Quranist?

Most of these "claims" are ridiculous, contradict the Quran and were invented by people who sought money (reporting Hadiths could get you richh at the time). They should be disregared.

Most people don't do much independent thinking, they just follow what their parents did. Besides, the Quran isn't entirely complete (for example, it tells you that you should pray 5 times a day, but doesn't explain how you should cleanse yourself before prayer or even how to perform a prayer).

The hadith are as toxic to islam as the talmud is to Jews and as their traditions are to popery.

For the same reason they came about - Mesopotamian religion is tied up in the idea of having your own rabbi and community distinct from the society at large.

The Hadith satisfies this by allowing someone to become a spiritual leader through a student-teacher chain that goes back to Muhammad himself while also providing a huge framework to come up with laws and practices that allow his followers to form a unique religious tradition.

It has the same role as the idea of imamate for Shia Muslims, Papal authority for Catholicism or church denomination for Protestantism.

>this meme

Primary Source Text

Age Limit in Age of Consent Laws in Selected Countries
1880 1920 2007
Austria 14 14 14
Belgium - 16 16
Bulgaria 13 13 14
Denmark 12 12 15
England & Wales 13 16 16
Finland - 12 16
France 13 13 15
Germany 14 14 14
Greece - 12 15
Italy - 16 14
Luxembourg 15 15 16
Norway - 16 16
Portugal 12 12 14
Romania 15 15 15
Russia 10 14 16
Scotland 12 12 16
Spain 12 12 13
Sweden 15 15 15
Switzerland various 16 16
Turkey 15 15 18
Argentina - 12 13
Brazil - 16 14
Chile 20 20 18
Ecuador - 14 14
Canada 12 14 14
Australia
New South Wales 12 16 16
Queensland 12 17 16
Victoria 12 16 16
Western Australia 12 14 16
United States
Alabama 10 16 16
Alaska - 16 16
Arizona 12 18 18
Arkansas 10 16 16
California 10 18 18
Colorado 10 18 15
Connecticut 10 16 16
District of Columbia 12 16 16
Delaware 7 16 16
Florida 10 18 18
Georgia 10 14 16
Hawaii - - 16
Idaho 10 18 18
Illinois 10 16 17
Indiana 12 16 16
Iowa 10 16 16
Kansas 10 18 16
Kentucky 12 16 16
Louisiana 12 18 17
Maine 10 16 16
Maryland 10 16 16
Massachusetts 10 16 16
Michigan 10 16 16
Minnesota 10 18 16
Mississippi 10 18 16
Missouri 12 18 17
Montana 10 18 16
Nebraska 10 18 17
Nevada 12 18 16
New Hampshire 10 16 16
New Jersey 10 16 16
New Mexico 10 16 17
New York 10 18 17
North Carolina 10 16 16
North Dakota 10 18 18
Ohio 10 16 16
Oklahoma - - 16
Oregon 10 16 18
Pennsylvania 10 16 16
Rhode Island 10 16 16
South Carolina 10 16 16
South Dakota 10 18 16
Tennessee 10 18 18
Texas 10 18 17
Utah 10 18 16
Vermont 10 16 16
Virginia 12 16 18
Washington 12 18 16
West Virginia 12 16 16
Wisconsin 10 16 18
Wyoming 10 16 16

stop trying to justify 9 year old marriage ur mad

it's already known to muslims that the real marriage age was 21

>Why are Hadiths considered so important?
Because muslims can't rape nine years old if there is no hadith.

Because although the Koran claims to be clearly written and complete, it is neither of these things so early muslims had to rely on non-Koranic material (the Hadiths) to fill in the gaps.

The actual reason is that the quran literally doesn't make sense without them. As in much of it is completely incomprehensible if you don't have a background understanding of what the fuck is going on. Hadith is that background.

e.g.
>quran: when he went to the thing he talked to her about the stuff he was thinking

What the fuck does that even mean?

Now suppose some elder Arab whispers is your ear "psst, kid, read this" and hands you a book called "the official hadith" and tells you to turn to page 945. And on page 945 it says "Muhammed went to the mosque and talked to Aisha there about how he was going to give her anal without lube that night because thinking about her virgin asshole was driving him crazy." Given that information, does the above line make more sense now?

genuine question: if Mohammed is merely a man & the messenger to God's word, why is it forbidden to depict him in image? Why is the whole caliphate ordeal a thing? Is it like how the Pope is in Catholicism?

If it's to avoid idolization or worship of him, isn't it having the opposite affect? The passionate reactions & attitude towards it seems like something normally reserved for the divine. I've read only the first half of the Qur'an, but so far it seems to strongly emphasize the dedication & love for God and only God. Why is there so much to do with Mohammed? Shouldn't all focus be towards worship & servitude of God?

Sorry if this is a bit of a complex question, just that so far in reading the Qur'an it seems like people shouldn't really put much thought at all into Mohammed & only focus on God (according to what I've read so far).

Well the reason is that religion is a mental illness.

Image making was grouped together with idolatry, and the aversion was more universal than specific for Muhammad. As the Middle East acclimated to imagery in more modern times that loosened a bit until sacred images became profane.

The Caliphate started out as a way to directly usurp the divine authority of a prophet by declaring the end of prophetic mission altogether and the beginning of a holy empire. As people came to hate the new empire and pine for superior moral leadership they split into one group that believed a more holy family should have taken over, and another group which usurped religious authority from the office and let it drift increasingly towards traditional forms of kingship.

Having the opposite effect was the point all along, as the growing acceptance of secular imagery in society led Islamists in modern times to enshrine Muhammad and other elements as inviolably sacred. This has more to do with modern nation-state politics than theology.

euphoric

...

Cause the Quran is so unclear about everything that they need a backup text to get the context, even then the Sirah literature is critically much more historical than these hadith's because they're written long after Islam and has anachronistic features

ask them then to explain all the unexplainable passages in the Quran without the hadith's they have to use eisegesis, plus it's a heresy in Islam you would be killed for it. Also no sunnah means no muslim way of life.

Here is your (you)

The Hadith were attempts at explaining these so-called unexplainable passages, and even then can't explain every single thing either. They've only become necessary because some centuries after Muhammad died it suddenly became very important to people that there should be a Muslim way of life.

And maybe there shouldn't.

it's painstaking work also reading it all, it has so many doublets, triplets, quadruplets, quintuplets of the same damn story in nearly every volume of a single hadith collection, sometimes it's the irrelevant and weird like talking about Muhammad's armpit hair, it makes 1st Chronicles genealogy a rollercoaster ride.