What the fuck was the Indo-European/Aryan secret to success...

What the fuck was the Indo-European/Aryan secret to success? What was it about this group in prehistory that enabled them to carve out timeless civilizations wherever they went?

I was reading Indoeuropean Poetry and Myth by West, he said that wheels, chariots and domesticated horses interevened very late in the (pre)history of the Indoeuropeans, so while they can explain a very explosive spread of this people, they cannot by themselves be the answer to your question.

Perhaps the caste system made sure that the warriors were professional-like enough to be more than a match for non-PIE tribes?

I don't recall ever hearing that they had exceptionally fierce warriors, outside of the advanced horse and chariot element you mentioned. The idea is good, though. If the tribe was organized enough in prehistory to have dedicated warrior castes a cut above everyone else, then they were bound to lay the bedrock for advanced civilization.

If they had the numbers as well, even better, but then there is the other question of how they managed to grow large and still stay cohesive, and that would be a cultural matter.

They were germanic

>still stay cohesive
West worked a lot on poetry and reconstructing the poets and his role.

Mythology keeps the tribal identity in place, and the poets promise (eternal) glory to their patrons and the warriors, you don't worry too much about the afterlife because of reincarnation, theosis or simply the stories and memories of the wandering poet.

I contend that the Indoeuropeans had the most advanced social structure and political system, at least when compared to the alternatives of their time that weren't in Egypt or Mesopotamia.

Dang, I really need to read that book.

Or are Germans Indo-Aryanid???

The PIE were literally Atlantians / Hyperboreans.

Genetics is often overlooked.

Nobody can beat >le chariot me, not even god.

>the caste system
get with the times grandpa dumezil isn't the patron saint of comparative mythology anymore
on the subject of IE poetry: epic poetry honestly can't tell us very much about the actual functioning of a society, just its outward trappings. The Iliad is splendid as a portrayal of bronze age warfare suffused with mythic symbolism, but you can't really get a good handle on exactly how wealthy Homeric Greece was and what stage of technological advancement did it reach. Just look at how over the place iron is portrayed, and how Bellerophon apparently knew how to write.

in addition IE poetry itself although indeed relatively very well and deeply attested does not have nearly comprehensive enough a record to reveal to us a moral foundation to PIE society: we know about the importance of undying glory but not much more than that. Watkins spent like half a book dealing with the (h1e-?)gwhen oghim formula just so he could firmly plant a branch of the dragonslaying tree on IE soil and prove that it wasn't a completely universal mytheme or whatever.

you talk more about poetry than either of the above anons.

as both of the anons above mentioned, it was the martial structure of indo-european society which led to its particular characteristics and success. indo-european culture was so martial that the military even usurped family and clan in terms of importance, this is unconstestable.

indians had a priestly society, which made them idiots. jews had a legal society, which made them smart liars. muslims had a clan society, which made them violent.

Chinese and Japanese had a legal-rationalist society, which made them smart and relatively peaceful, but not nearly as good at establishing truthfulness as ours, and which made them less ambitious.

martial success allows zero room for lies, as a single lie will destroy an entire military campaign. it's why we're the most truthful society even though we're not necessarily the smartest, and why we laud the warrior class, because they're the pillar that upholds truth telling in our society.

Genetics really is everything

yeah, culture wouldn't even exist without genes.

Autism.

This is coming from a Persian btw.

Literally milk. More access to more calories and more easily obtained.

Just saw this in another thread an it really made me think:

It was pretty much all due to weather and flora/fauna when you really think about it.

Smart people are and were everywhere, but only few of them were able to utilize their surroundings in such a way like it was possible in europe.

>Usually the fact that were multiple small states fighting one another leading to a competitive edge.
Also this

Society is a racial construct.

And genes wouldn't exist without beans

TRUE

>mfw captcha is milkshake

u kno history, philology, linguistics, genetics and all that has moved on from max müller right

the urheimat ain't free. the ash world tree of creation gotta be litterd with the blood of proto-uralics. basques, dravidians, etruscans and pelASSgians are NOT my people. they are aborigine subhumans and probably matriarchal as well. manu and yemu not apollo and odin ok. praise the skyfather.

Bronze and iron metallurgy and nomadic pastoralism. They weren't necessarily more advanced than preceding cultures except where hunter gatherers were still present but as seems to be the rule, nomadic tribes generally beat out settled peoples in warfare.
Really the most notable are the Romans, Greeks, Vedic, and Iranian civilizations. The Persian expansion was probably eased by the void left by the Sumerians.
Other Indo-European peoples before colonialism achieved a level of success similar to most other prominent cultures in the world.

back to skadi, dumbfuck

>eat somebad mushrooms
>genocide niggers

Cherrypicked comparison. Your average Iranian girl is hotter than a hunchback Teutonic hobgoblin Frau.