Is there, historically, a single civilization that has been successful with women in power?

Egyptians had several successful female rulers and regents

Female monarchs in general don't seem to have been any worse than male monarchs.

England, Russia, Spain, etc.

America since Obama may as well be a woman

"Spain" (castille). But Isabella knew well he needed men, like his husband or Cisneros, to help her rule.

Also every other women ruling Castille or Spain has been absolutely awful.

Got her ass raped, Palmyra was only succesful under his husband.

I'd argue that a female leader could be better, and not in a feminist way, fuck that.

Look at Victoria. The empire was at its height under her, and she did the important thing of not acting like an interfering moron. Instead of trying to do things herself like a lot of dumb kings would do, there was a motherly approach, she wanted the best for her nation and she made sure the best people were in charge of achieving that.

Maybe it depends on the people of the country, but in the UK certainly their attitudes and abilities meant a female ruler could have success. The UK in general was best ruled in a semi hands-off way.

Yes, the Minoans, the Etruscans, the Assyrians, the ancient Egyptians, the list could go on.

Do you expect to get diffente replies since your lasts threads?

Yes. Several actually.

depending on your definition of "power" you can also add Victoria and the Lizard queen

oh and Boudica

From scratch? Then no,most of the civilizations with meme female leaders had the infrastructure already set up by men.

>Boudicca
>successful

She was a successful leader before the Romans said she couldn't be a leader anymore. Then she chimped out

>Boudica
The greatest thing she ever did was provide the form that would be modeled into Civ 5 and then SFM porn.

This. Women are fucking failures unless men do all the fucking work for them. I fucking laugh at women.

Thatcher

Oh wait.

Fair, tons laughs at you after all.

The thing is, would the opinion and deeds of these powerful women really be appreciated by contemporary Western women?

I don't think so.

St. Olga

>Queen Empress Victoria

She was the Queen of England and called herself Empress of India

Didn't she spread hemophilia to nearly all the royal families of Europe and in doing so screwed over the Romanov Dynasty which led to the rise of the Soviet Union?

there would never be anything like a female ISIS.

Nah, Romanov Dynasty was pretty screwed even before Rasputin bullshit.

Male leaders also had an infrastructures made by other persons, not by themselves... what a dumb argument...

Based Thatcher

>Uk comes to mind

If you think Queen Elizabeth was in power or in control of the government, then you are ignorant.

This. The UK is a fucking democracy

see

The first Elizabeth was

This is going to be one of those loooong centuries, isn't it?

>overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.

Valerie Solanas, feminist author SCUM Manifesto

Catherine the great and Elizabeth the first.

Yes made by other men the fact is you women havent done jackshit from scratch for the entirety of human existence, without male created education systems and books you wouldnt be shit.

Nice b8 my shitposting friend, tell us about your virginity.

tfw no dido and carthage :>

Without male inventions women would be nothing. The entire system of society was conceptualized by men and women follow it thus without men women would be in the neolithic era in terms of social development and honestly they appear to be that because without men women seem to act like wild animals more than actual people I mean as long as they can get cock everything is A ok.

No, thats you, the cock-hungry one, I mean.

Are you ever talk to a girl, or just another human being? Also i hope this is b8.

...

You werent oppressed you are just mentally inferior to men when it comes to abstract and rational reasoning causing you come short when it comes to making big decisions for the tribe, men saw this and realize if they allowed you to run things everything would go to shit so kept you as their fucktoys or lovers till that sexual liberation bullshit happened. I mean while you can memorize pictures that doesnt mean you are up to par with men at all im sorry honey we never needed you in the workforce men alone can do all the serious labor while you do the housework or something like cooking, agriculture,acting, singing, or clothing making.

Too bad that i'm a man my virgin friend, tell us more about your basement.

What the hell, this is a rational reason why women lagged behind men since forever, and you call me a virgin for stating this? How strange its haram to ever not think women are perfect, its socially accepted to submit to women and be their little bitchs what irony the human has been domesticated by the subhuman.

Were all equal in status where each sex has different strengths and weaknesses. No one is more superior then the other. Without one the other wouldn't prosper just like it is with most species.

Also I hear that Russia was pretty ballin with Catherine the Great in charge

Wrong the only worth women have to human civilization is their ability to make new humans same as men though, while us men made human civilization whether through labor or creating ideas without men there would be no human civilizations at all thats a fact. We are superior to them mentally I already told you they are inferior emotional irrational weak subhumans that act human because men taught you how to behave millenia ago but on their own they act no different from bonobos in the heat.

Catherine the great is a meme, the infrastructure in Russia was carried by men not women.

>when he thinks of "Queen Elizabeth" he thinks of the current Elizabeth and not the original

This is a history board, get out.

Women haven't been able to contribute as much as men throughout history because they've been oppressed by men and forced to fulfill only certain roles in society.

If you really believe Women lack the skills to create ideas because they have different genitals than you then you're a fucking idiot. Men are the ones who fucked everything up throughout human history, including trying to reduce women to subhuman baby makers.

Women are subhuman though

Feminists and liberals alike hate her guts and claim she ruined GB

England Spain Russia and Austria have had successful female rulers.

We don't have liberals in the UK.

We just call them "loony lefties" or "the pc brigade"

What sort of actual evidence do you have for that viewpoint? Being rejected by some girls in high school that didn't want to date you doesn't count.

>gets BTFO
>ur a loser virgin lmao

Why must women be so shit at arguing?

>we dindu nuffin it wuz men's fault!!!
Truly the niggers of gender.

You do know she won't suck your dick for this right? You're too fat and "nice"

Empirical evidence.

They consistently fit the criteria for being sub-human therefore we can say the most likely are subhuman.

Of course a black swan event can happen, but we are mitigated sceptics.

Okay, let me spell this out for you guys. I'm asking what sort of scientific/historical evidence there is supporting the idea that women are mentally inferior to men.

Im assuming you don't have any otherwise instead of hurling insults you would be laying out your reasons. I guess just another couple of bitter faggots.

>no one mentions Indira gandhi

Let's she what she did

>won a war against america's important ally, tearing it to shreds literally and weakening burger influence in the subcontinent

>detonated a nuclear weapon for reasons

>made india move far more closer to the soviet union while becoming friendlier with non american western countries.

>kickstarted the siachen conflict

>started the indian emergency, then relinquished power because it was the right thing to do.

>came back after winning another election.

>helped modernize india by nationalizing key sectors like coal, and banking.

you racist piece of shit

>Boudica
>successful

I honestly can't tell if you're joking or not.

England, Elizabeth I
UK, Thatcher

Catherine the Great isnt a Meme. Russia under her rule partioned Poland, and conquered the Crimean tatars, if Putin is invading Crimea it is because of stuff that happened in Catherine's reign.

She was an alpha male with a vagine, she treated cute men as sluts, fucked them (often fuckign men much younger than her), and when she got tired of them she would retire them, give them as a gift some town and a few thousand peasant serfs, and find another fuckboy

Women can be great rulers if they have a man brain, like Catherine the Great or Margaret Thatcher. I would vote a masculine woman but not a feminine woman.

Kiev under Olga

any modern state with a female head of government honestly germany is doing pretty well economically

boudicca got fucking destroyed.

>she treated cute men as sluts,
Sources for personal research, please.

anyone would get destroyed by rome

She had no power and was taught by her husband not to abuse the influence of the monarchy.