How did the study of Indo-European languages spawn the concept of the 'Aryan master race'?

Wasn't Gobineau a massive Persiaboo?

>How did the study of Indo-European languages spawn the concept of the 'Aryan master race'?
It was spawned by need of some Germanic intelectuals trying to find a scientific (genetic) reason for succes of their nations. Study of IE languages were just means to an end.

And ethnicities aren't genetic groups.

They thought that europes superiority was founded on race. A race that was naturaly stronger and smarter and through the laws of darwinism destined to rule all the lower races.
But were is the origin of the aryan race?
Well it must be the most modern and successful nations of the 19th century, the anglo-saxons and the germanics. And as they expandet through europe and asia they racemixed with the locals and degenerated.

Iran

that anglo-"teuton" looks lika a pooftah and I'll smash his gob in I swear on me mum.

Specifically Ukraine? How certain are you?

it didnt

it was the enlightenment and pseudoscientific asshats like blumenbach and j. c. lavater

Not 100%, but it's in the general area.

> Also the fact that blue eyes originated there.

No, they didn't.

Yes, around the black sea is a better answer

Why did you say the Ukraine and not the Kazakstani chinkniggerlands?

Hello /stormfront/

>How did the study of Indo-European languages spawn the concept of the 'Aryan master race'?
>They thought
wew

>moving the goal posts
wew

now that Ukraine is a country the term doesn't apply as heavily but generally speaking the step region east of Ukraine was also considered "Ukraine" at one point

you realize he was explaining their logic to you right? he's not professing it as truth, he's saying what their reasoning was. Stop getting so triggered

>Davies described Gobineau as someone who was extremely "alienated" from the society and age he was living in, and wrote that Gobineau's frequent prophecies about the coming destruction of European civilization as there was not enough Aryan blood left to sustain Europe reflected the fact that Gobineau, who was unable to embrace his age instead wished for its destruction

Truly, an autist ahead of his time

>triggered

One would have to note that the social sciences back then were not backed by science at all and basically had the scientific rigour of an internet blog/Veeky Forums post for a disturbingly large portion of it.

They were only lightskinned compared to other people. They were darker than southern Euros today but lighter than Western European hunter gatherers.

>and dark haired and dark eyed
Explain the tocharian mummies.

The Tarim Basin mummies. Some of these mummies were almost assuredly Tocharian, but claiming that they all were is a quite big assumption. And we don't know when did they migrate, whence, and which route did they take. The linguistic evidence only offers weak similarities with Celtic and Anatolian.

For more info on the mummies just read Mair et al.'s paper, which I think has been published in the Sino-Platonic papers.

Genetic cluster analysis wants a word with you.

but that has no bearing on
>An ethnic group or ethnicity is a category of people who identify with each other based on similarities, such as common language, ancestral, social, cultural, or national experiences.[1][2]

oh my god

you people will twist and twist and twist definitions until the end of time

people aren't falling for your tricks anymore

genetic differences are real. ethnicities and cultures form around them 99.99% of the time. counterexamples include niggers who live in america, who still have 70 iq points, but idiots like you twist definitions to try and pretend that they're the same as white americans. kill yourself.

>How did germanic studies cause the allies to invent an atrocity propaganda strawman term which was never actually used even once by the actual national socialists themselves but was attributed to them nonetheless, with gullible uneducated retards like OP still believing they used the term "master race" even though they never actually did?

Gee isn't that the question of the day

They never used anglo colonial terms "black", "white" etc. either nor their studies on human differences were based on ethnicity, as it would make no sense for anybody with basic knowledge about evolution.

>you people will twist and twist and twist definitions until the end of time
lol it's literally the established definition of an ethnic group from Wikipedia.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_group

genetics does not effect what makes an ethnic group, it has no bearing on that which actually defines an ethnic group.

sure, historic germanic y-dna exists but a germanic person can have non-germanic y dna because ethnicity has it's substance elsewhere.

wow, it's almost like they're indo-european or something.

Maybe their language had some quality that made it better. Kinda like the phonecean alphabet.

>ethnicities and cultures form around them 99.99% of the time
they don't form around them , ancient peoples didn't have DNA testers, it's just that these different ethnicity emerged out of these groups as time went on. It ceases to be relevant once it no longer pertains to tangible things.

germans are such scum

>genetics does not effect what makes an ethnic group, it has no bearing on that which actually defines an ethnic group.

Nonsense there is clearly a relationship between culture and genetics at work in the concept of an ethnicity.

ethnicity have little impact on genetics.